Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards the use of ecological heterogeneity to design reserve networks: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel approach for using ecological heterogeneity in reserve design. We measured five ecological heterogeneity indices (EHI) and we used a database of six biological groups (woody plants, orchids, orthopterans, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna and passerine birds) across 30 sites in a Mediterranean reserve (Greece). We found that all the five EHI were significantly related to the overall species richness and to the species richness of woody plants and birds. Two indices, measuring vertical vegetation complexity (1/D) and horizontal heterogeneity of landcover types (SIDI) in terms of Simpson’s index, predicted well overall species richness and had significantly higher values inside the complementary reserve networks designed after five of the six biological groups. We compared five methods of forming reserve networks. The method of ecological heterogeneity (selecting those sites with the greatest 1/D and then SIDI) was less efficient (non-significantly) than the species-based methods (scoring and complementary networks) but significantly more efficient than the random method (randomly selected network). We also found that the method of complementary ecological heterogeneity (selecting those sites where each EHI had its maximum value) was not that efficient, as it did not differ significantly from the random method. These results underline the potential of the ecological heterogeneity method as an alternative tool in reserve design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo MB, Humphries CJ, Densham PJ, Lampinen R, Hagemeijer WJM, Mitchell-Jones AJ, Gasc JP (2001) Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? Ecography 24:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arponen A, Heikkinen RK, Thomas CD, Moilanen A (2005) The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: representation, species weighting, and benefit functions. Conserv Biol 19:2009–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arponen A, Kondelin H, Moilanen A (2007) Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach. Conserv Biol 21:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atauri JA, De Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Ecology: economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Aronson J (1999) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohning-Gaese K (1997) Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 24:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan S, Schnell GD (2005) Relationship between bird abundances and landscape characteristics: the influence of scale. Environ Monit Assess 105:209–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brokaw N, Lent R (1999) Vertical structure. In: Hunter M (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza M, Moilanen A (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 16:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza M, Arponen A, van Teeffelen A (2008) Top predators: hot or not? A call for systematic assessment of biodiversity surrogates. J Appl Ecol 45:976–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprio E, Ellena I, Rolando A (2009) Assessing habitat/landscape predictors of bird diversity in managed deciduous forests: a seasonal and guild-based approach. Biodivers Conserv 18:1287–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro T, Engilis A Jr, Fitzherbert E, Gardner T (2004) Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Anim Conserv 7:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Rouget M, Lombard AT (2003) Conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 112:191–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ND, Perry LM, Bryan BA, Ostendorf B (2007) CREDOS: a conservation reserve evaluation and design optimisation system. Environ Modell Softw 22:449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Cons 128:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafis S, Papastergiadou E, Lazaridou T, Tsiafouli M (2001) Technical guide for identification, description and mapping of habitat types of Greece. Greek Wetland and Biotope Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Interpretation manual of European Union Habitats (EUR25) nature and biodiversity. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP, Walker PA (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biod Conserv 5:399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A (1997) Landscape structure and breeding bird distribution in a sub-Mediterranean agro-ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 12:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T, Behrens M, Loritz H (2008) Orthopteran communities in the conifer-broadleaved woodland zone of the Russian Far East. Eur J Entomol 105:673–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin AB, Noon BR, George TL (2002) What is habitat fragmentation? Stud in Av Biol 25:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand J, Cushman SA (2003) A multi-scale analysis of species-environment relationships: breeding birds in a pitch pine-scrub oak (Pinus rigida-Quercus iilicifolia) community. Biol Conserv 112:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grand J, Cummings M, Rebelo TG, Ricketts TH, Neel MC (2007) Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks. Ecol Lett 10:364–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess GR, Bartel RA, Leidner AK, Rosenfeld KM, Rubino MJ, Snider SB, Ricketts TH (2006) Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region. Biol Conserv 132:448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Hermy M, Coppin P (1999) Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation. Biol Conserv 87:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard PC, Viskanic P, Davenport TRB, Kigenyi FW, Baltzer M, Dickinson CJ, Lwanga JS, Matthews RA, Balmford A (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394:275–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity, the coexistence of species in changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis Y, Chiras G, Kardakari N (2008) Comparison of reptile communities in three types of thermophilous Mediterranean forest in southern Greece. J Nat Hist 42:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R, Allouche O (2007) Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory. Am Nat 170:443–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kallimanis AS, Halley JM, Vokou D, Sgardelis SP (2008) The scale of analysis determines the spatial pattern of woody species diversity in the Mediterranean environment. Plant Ecol 196:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Sekercioglu CH (2006) Diversity, ecological structure, and conservation of the landbird community of Dadia reserve, Greece. Divers Distrib 12:620–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Lebrun Ph, Devillers P, Papaioannou H (2000) Les orchidées de la réserve de Dadia (Grece), leurs habitats et leur conservation. Les Naturalistes Belges 81:269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Vokou D, Lebrun Ph (2004a) Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 120:475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Vokou D, Lebrun Ph (2004b) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Grill A, Lebrun Ph (2004c) Conservation management for the Orthoptera in the Dadia reserve, Greece. Biol Cons 115:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Foufopoulos J, Ioannidis Y, Papaioannou H, Poirazidis K, Lebrun Ph (2007) Diversity, ecological structure and conservation of herpetofauna in a Mediterranean area (Dadia National Park, Greece). Amphibia-Reptilia 28:517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Dimopoulos P, Papaioannou H, Poirazidis K (2009) Ecological management of a Mediterranean mountainous reserve (Pindos National Park, Greece) using the bird community as an indicator. J Nat Conserv 17:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korakis G, Gerasimidis A, Poirazidis K, Kati V (2006) Floristic records from Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park, NE Greece. Flora Mediterranea 16:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler AW (1988) A physiognomic and structural analysis of vegetation. In: Küchler AW, Zonneveld IS (eds) Vegetation mapping, handbook of vegetation science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Jetz W (2008) Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change. P R Soc B-Biol Sci 275:1261–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Franklin J (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard A (1995) The problem with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? S Afr J Zool 30:145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meir E, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2004) Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol Lett 7:615–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A (2007) Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biol Conserv 134:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montigny MK, MacLean DA (2005) Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an intensively managed industrial forest. Biol Conserv 125:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Zechmeister HG, Plutzar C, Sauberer N, Wrbka T, Grabherr G (2002) Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 17:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Schaminée JHJ, Rodwell JS (2000) Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci 11:769–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Tree 21:681–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson E, Westphal MI, Frank K, Rochester ΑW, Pressey LR, Lindenmayer BD, Possingham PH (2006) A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Ecol Lett 9:1049–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Possingham HP, Day JR (1997) Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol Conserv 80:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, Cowling RM, Wilson KA (2007) Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 22:583–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) Statistical analysis Software user’s guide: statistics Ver. 5. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler S, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T (2008) Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecol Indic 8:502–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Torras O, Gil-Tena A, Saura S (2008) How does forest landscape structure explain tree species richness in a Mediterranean context? Biodivers Conserv 17:1227–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiftsis S, Tsiripidis I, Karagiannakidou V, Alifragis D (2008) Niche analysis and conservation of the orchids of East Macedonia (NE Greece). Acta Oecol 33:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel E (2005) Vegetation ecology—an overview. In: Van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels KJ, Freitag S, van Jaarsveld AS (1999) The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at local scale. Biol Conserv 89:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Faith D, Manne L, Sechrest W, Preston C (2006) Complementarity analysis: mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 128:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaura Y, Kawahara T, Iida S, Ozaki K (2008) Relative importance of the area and shape of patches to the diversity of multiple taxa. Conserv Biol 22:1513–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research of K.P. was financed by the Greek project “PYTHAGORAS II: KE 1329-1”. We are grateful to L. Borda de Agua, J. Prendergast, K. Van Houtan and two anonymous referees for helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Ioannina, Seferi 2, 30100, Agrinio, Greece

    Vassiliki Kati & Panayotis Dimopoulos

  2. World Wide Fund Greece, Dadia Project, 68400, Dadia, Soufli, Greece

    Kostas Poirazidis

  3. Centre de Recherche de la Nature, des Forêts et du Bois, Ministère de la Région Wallonne, Avenue Maréchal Juin, 23, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium

    Marc Dufrêne

  4. Department of Biological Applications and Technologies, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

    John M. Halley

  5. Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 68200, Orestiada, Greece

    Giorgos Korakis

  6. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria

    Stefan Schindler

Authors
  1. Vassiliki Kati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kostas Poirazidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Dufrêne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John M. Halley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giorgos Korakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stefan Schindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Panayotis Dimopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassiliki Kati.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 458 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kati, V., Poirazidis, K., Dufrêne, M. et al. Towards the use of ecological heterogeneity to design reserve networks: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Biodivers Conserv 19, 1585–1597 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9788-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9788-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation