Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is the global conservation status assessment of a threatened taxon a utopia?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The signatory countries of the Convention on Biological Diversity agreed to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. How will we know, however, if we have achieved this goal? Eight groups of hindrances in evaluating the global conservation status of threatened taxon are identified: (1) the extreme heterogeneity and (2) restricted availability of relevant data; (3) the uncertainty in species number and taxonomic division of the given taxon (Linnean shortfall); (4) the fragmentary distribution knowledge (Wallacean shortfall); (5) the incomplete or incorrect red-listing across the whole distribution area; (6) the lack of homogeneous and exhaustive population trend data; (7) the threat knowledge shortfall; (8) the incomplete general biological knowledge on a given taxon. The Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls lay the foundation of all other hindrances. So long as this dramatic shortfall situation does not change, the adequate assessment of the global status for overwhelming majority of extant taxa will remain a utopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bini LM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Ranger TFLVB, Bastos RP, Plaza Pinto M (2006) Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot. Divers Distrib 12:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T, Kennedy E (2004) Biodiversity barometers. Nature 431:1046–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Lomolino MV (1998) Biogeography. Sinauer Press, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Keith AD, Walshe TV (1999) Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis for threatened Australian plant species. Risk Anal 19:585–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun SM, Shutes SM, Akçakaya HR, Baillie JEM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2004) Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds. PLoS Biol 2:2294–2304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM, Rodriguez JP (2001) The application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels. Conserv Biol 15:1206–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DM (2005) Designatable units for status assessment of endangered species. Conserv Biol 19:1813–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins M (2003) Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302:1175–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller V, Zbinden N, Schmid H, Volet B (2005) A case study in applying the IUCN regional guidelines for national Red Lists and justifications for their modification. Conserv Biol 19:1827–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Heaney LR (eds) (2004) Frontiers of biogeography: new directions in the geography of nature. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris E (2007) The species and the specious. Nature 446:250–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Master LL (1991) Assessing threats and seting priorities for conservation. Conserv Biol 5:559–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean IFG, Wight AD, Williams G (1999) The role of legislation in conserving Europe’s threatened species. Conserv Biol 13:966–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J-M, Angelstam P (2004) Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv Biol 18:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL (2006) Are global conservation efforts successful? Science 313:1051–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd CR, Burgman MA (1998) Assessment of threat and conservation priorities under realistic levels of uncertainty and reliability. Conserv Biol 12:966–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and project. Divers Distrib 11:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1992) The diversity of life. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregor Kozlowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozlowski, G. Is the global conservation status assessment of a threatened taxon a utopia?. Biodivers Conserv 17, 445–448 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9278-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9278-z

Keywords

Navigation