Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the foraging ecology of feral cats change after the eradication of foxes?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive species control has resulted in unintended consequences where the control of one species causes increased impacts of a co-occurring species. Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cats (Felis catus) co-occur throughout Australia—with control and regulation of fox’s commonplace, a greater understanding of how feral cats will respond in the absence of foxes is needed. In this study we use feral cat diet to assess potential prey switching after red fox control. Feral cat stomach contents were sampled between 1983 and 1994 on Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia when both feral cats and red foxes were abundant; and again from 2016 to 2019 when foxes were eradicated. A total of 277 feral cats were sampled between 1983–1994 and 415 from 2016 to 2019. Although we did not track feral cat diet throughout the red fox decline, diet comparisons between the two time periods suggest no substantial shift in feral cat diet with only slight increases in invertebrates and black rats observed. Invasive prey (European rabbits, black rats, and house mice) still formed the majority of feral cat diet. We further reinforce the role of seasonality, surrounding land use and sex as factors influencing cat diet. Our results suggest red fox control in the presence of cats may still achieve conservation benefits with feral cats maintaining a comparable diet, dominated by invasive species, despite fox control—though this may be context dependent. Given the abundance and frequency of invasive prey species within cat diet, we further support the idea that invasive prey control could be a viable indirect method to control the impacts of feral cats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Roger Kirkwood, Maria Belvedere and Peter Dann for access to the data from their original study. We would also like to thank the dedicated work of the Phillip Island Nature Parks vertebrate pest team: Stuart Murphy, Frank Gigliotti, Richard Faulkner, Roger Whitelaw, and Ash Reed for their provision of samples and making this project possible. This research was supported by the Holsworth Research Endowment and the Centre for Integrative Ecology at Deakin University. Phillip Island Nature Parks provided in-kind support. Samples were collected under appropriate Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning research permits no. 1007858 and 10009013.

Funding

This research was supported by the Holsworth Research Endowment and the Centre for Integrative Ecology at Deakin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Anthony Rendall, Duncan Sutherland, John White, Raylene Cooke; Formal analysis and investigation: Anthony Rendall; Writing—original draft preparation: Anthony Rendall; Writing—review and editing: Duncan Sutherland, John White, Raylene Cooke.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony R. Rendall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare not competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 268 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rendall, A.R., Sutherland, D.R., Cooke, R. et al. Does the foraging ecology of feral cats change after the eradication of foxes?. Biol Invasions 24, 1413–1426 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02718-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02718-x

Keywords

Navigation