Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting and mapping the risk of introduction of marine non-indigenous species into Great Britain and Ireland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-indigenous species (NIS) can have adverse environmental, economic and social impacts. Their management is now incorporated into key legislation, including the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the EU Regulation on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Prevention of NIS introductions and the early detection of NIS following their introduction are recognised as the most effective approaches for reducing the potential impacts of NIS. This is true for most aquatic environments but especially so for the marine environment, where control and/or eradication are often not achievable. By assessing introduction vector activity, it is possible to identify coastal areas and specific locations where marine NIS may be more likely to be introduced. This study uses data relating to the activity of key introduction vectors; shipping, recreational boating and live animal aquaculture import, to estimate the relative risk of introduction of NIS around coastal regions of Great Britain and Ireland. Spatial analysis was used to create “heat” maps indicating coastal areas of increased relative risk of introduction of NIS by these vectors. The results of the present study will be crucial for the implementation of targeted vector management plans, supporting preventive strategies, and will facilitate a risk analyses of NIS threats to inform monitoring and surveillance programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta H, Forrest BM (2009) The spread of marine non-indigenous species via recreational boating: a conceptual model for risk assessment based on fault tree analysis. Ecol Modell 220(13–14):1586–1598. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkenford (2014) Watersports Participation Survey. Full Report

  • Ashton GV, Boos K, Shucksmith R, Cook EJ (2006) Risk assessment of hull fouling as a vector for marine non-natives in Scotland. Aquat Invasions 1(4):214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacela-Spychalska K (2016) Attachment ability of two invasive amphipod species may promote their spread by overland transport. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26(1):196–201. doi:10.1002/aqc.2565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RHA, Black R, Copp GH, Haysom KA, Hulme PE, Thomas MB, Brown A, Brown M, Cannon RJC, Ellis J, Ellis M, Ferris R, Glaves P, Gozlan RE, Holt J, Howe L, Knight JD, MacLeod A, Moore NP, Mumford JD, Murphy ST, Parrott D, Sansford CE, Smith GC, St-Hilaire S, Ward NL (2008) The UK risk assessment scheme for all non-native species. In: Rabitsch W, Essl F, Klingenstein F (eds) Biological invasions – from ecology to conservation, vol 7. pp 46–57

  • Bishop J (2012) Carpet Sea-squirt, Didemnum vexillum GBNNSS factsheet. http://www.nonnativespecies.org/factsheet/downloadFactsheet.cfm?speciesId=1209

  • Carlton JT (2001) The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the World’s oceans. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT, De Voe M (1992) Marine species introductions by ships’ ballast water: an overview. In: Proceedings of the conference and workshop on introductions and transfers of marine species: achieving a balance between economic development and resource protection. pp 23–25, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina

  • Clarke Murray C, Pakhomov EA, Therriault TW (2011) Recreational boating: a large unregulated vector transporting marine invasive species. Divers Distrib 17(6):1161–1172. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00798.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Fox MG (2007) Growth and life history traits of introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in Europe, and the relevance to invasiveness potential. In: Gherardi F (ed) Freshwater bioinvaders: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–306. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Templeton M, Gozlan RE (2007) Propagule pressure and the invasion risks of non-native freshwater fishes: a case study in England. J Fish Biol 71:148–159. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01680.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Villizi L, Gozlan RE (2010) Fish movements: the introduction pathway for topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva and other non-native fishes in the UK. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 20:269–273. doi:10.1002/aqc.1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling JA, Herborg LM, Davidson IC (2012) Intracoastal shipping drives patterns of regional population expansion by an invasive marine invertebrate. Ecol Evol 2(10):2552–2561. doi:10.1002/ece3.362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies GD, Gozlan RE, Robert Britton J (2013) Can accidental introductions of non-native species be prevented by fish stocking audits? Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 23(3):366–373. doi:10.1002/aqc.2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBNNSS (2011) GB non-native organism risk assessment of didemnum species. GB Non-Native Species Secr. www.nonnativespecies.org//index.cfm?sectionid=51. Accessed 24 July 2015

  • Gollasch S, Haydar D, Minchin D, Wolff WJ, Reise K (2009) Introduced aquatic species of the North Sea coasts and adjacent brackish waters. In: Rilov G, Crooks J (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozlan RE (2008) Introduction of non-native freshwater fish: is it all bad? Fish Fish 9(1):106–115. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00267.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozlan RE, Andreou D, Asaeda T, Beyer K, Bouhadad R, Burnard D et al (2010) Pan-continental invasion of Pseudorasbora parva: towards a better understanding of freshwater fish invasions. Fish Fish 11(4):315–340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00361.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith K, Mowat S, Rohan H (2009) First records in Great Britain of the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum Kott 2002. Aquact Invasions 4(4):581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22(3):534–543. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46(1):10–18. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, Minchin D et al (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45(2):403–414. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Maritime Organization (1974) International convention for the safety of life at seas (SOLAS)

  • International Maritime Organization (2009) Ballast water management convention and the guidelines for its implementation

  • Johnson L, Ricciardi A, Carlton J (2001) Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecol Appl. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1789:ODOAIS]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Belchior C, Cardoso AC (2013) Invading European Seas: assessing pathways of introduction of marine aliens. Ocean Coast Manag 76:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller RP, Drake JM, Drew MB, Lodge DM (2011) Linking environmental conditions and ship movements to estimate invasive species transport across the global shipping network. Divers Distrib 17(1):93–102. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00696.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert G (2009) Adventures of a sea squirt sleuth: unraveling the idendity of Didemnum vexillum, a global ascidian invader. Aquat Invasions 4(1):5–28. doi:10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20(5):223–228. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor RL, Williams SL, Strong DR (2001) Ecology—aquaculture—a gateway for exotic species. Science 294(5547):1655–1656. doi:10.1126/science.1064875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke CR, Thomas R, Porter RD, Hellmann JJ, Dukes JS, Lodge DM, Chavarria G (2008) Current practices and future opportunities for policy on climate change and invasive species. Conserv Biol 22(3):585–592. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00956.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2005) Handbook of the convention on biological diversity including its cartagena protocol on biosafety, 3rd edn. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith RJ, Shelmerdine RL (2015) A risk based approach to non-native species management and biosecurity planning. Mar Policy 59:32–43. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simkanin C, Davidson I, Falkner M, Sytsma M, Ruiz G (2009) Intra-coastal ballast water flux and the potential for secondary spread of non-native species on the US West Coast. Mar Pollut Bull 58(3):366–374. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.10.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AL, Hewitt N, Klenk N, Bazely DR, Yan N, Wood S, Henriques I, MacLellan JI, Lipsig-Mummé C (2012) Effects of climate change on the distribution of invasive alien species in Canada: a knowledge synthesis of range change projections in a warming world. Environ Rev 20(1):1–16. doi:10.1139/a11-020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma M, Pennington T (2016) Vectors for spread of invasive freshwater vascular plants with a North American analysis. In: Canning-Clode J (ed) Biological invasions in changing ecosystems. vectors, ecological impacts, management and predictions. De Gruyter Press, Berlin, pp 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrush MA, Peeler EJ (2013) A model to approximate lake temperature from gridded daily air temperature records and its application in risk assessment for the establishment of fish diseases in the UK. Transbound Emerg Dis 60(5):460–471. doi:10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01368.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UKTAG (2015) Revised classification of aquatic alien species according to their level of impact. United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive. www.wfduk.org/tagged/alien-Species. Accessed 24 July 2015

  • Werschkun B, Banerji S, Basurko OC, David M, Fuhr F, Gollasch S et al (2014) Emerging risks from ballast water treatment: the run-up to the international Ballast water management convention. Chemosphere 112:256–266. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (2001) Invasive Alien Species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CAB Int, Oxon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zięba G, Copp G, Davies G, Stebbing P (2010) Recent releases and dispersal of non-native fishes in England and Wales, with emphasis on sunbleak Leucaspius delineatus (Heckel, 1843). Aquat Invasions 5(2):155–161. doi:10.3391/ai.2010.5.2.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript and Natural Resources Wales (NRW) and the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) who funded this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah J. Tidbury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tidbury, H.J., Taylor, N.G.H., Copp, G.H. et al. Predicting and mapping the risk of introduction of marine non-indigenous species into Great Britain and Ireland. Biol Invasions 18, 3277–3292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1219-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1219-x

Keywords

Navigation