Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological niche modeling of the invasive potential of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in African river systems: concerns and implications for the conservation of indigenous congenerics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applied ecological niche models to determine the potential invasive range of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, with a particular focus on river systems in southern Africa where it is now established and spreading. Computational tools such as niche models are useful in predicting the potential range of invasive species, but there are limitations to their application. In particular, models trained on native records may fail to predict the full extent of an invasion. This failure is often attributed to changes in either the niche of the invading species or the variables used to develop the models. In this study, we therefore evaluated the differences in the predictive power of models trained with different environmental variables, the effect of species range (native vs. introduced) on model performance and assessed whether or not there is evidence suggestive of a niche shift in Nile tilapia following its introduction. Niche models were constructed using Maxent and the degree of niche similarity was assessed using Schoener`s index. Null models were used to test for significance. Model performance and niche conservatism varied significantly with variable selection and species range. This indicates that the environmental conditions available to Nile tilapia in its native and introduced ranges are not congruent. Nile tilapia exhibited broad invasive potential over most of southern Africa that overlaps the natural range of endemic congenerics. Of particular concern are areas which are free of exotic species but are now vulnerable due to the promotion of fish introductions mainly for aquaculture and sport fishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Amoundi M, El-Sayed AFM, El-Ghobashy A (1996) Effects of thermal and thermo-haline shocks on survival and osmotic concentration of the tilapias Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis aureus × Oreochromis niloticus hybrids. J World Aquacult Soc 27:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RP, Raza A (2010) The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J Biogeogr 37:1378–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood HL, Tomaso JR, Webb K, Gatlin DM (2003) Low-temperature tolerance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: effects of environmental and dietary factors. Aquac Res 34:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balirwa JS (1998) Lake Victoria wetlands and the ecology of the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus Linne. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University

  • Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W, Downey PO, Leishman MR, Hughes L (2009) Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Divers Distrib 15:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyahya L, Caissie D, St-Hilaire A, Ouarda TBMJ, Bobée B (2007) A review of statistical water temperature models. Can Wat Resour J 32:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bills R, Marshall BE (2004) Fishes of the Four Corner area. In: Timberlake JR, Childes SL (eds) Biodiversity of the Four Corners area: technical reviews volume two., Occasional publications in Biodiversity no 15Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Bulawayo/Zambezi Society, Harare, pp 353–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann O, Guisan A (2008) Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol Lett 4:585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broennimann O, Treier UA, Muller-Scharer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, Guisan A (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10:701–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambray J, Swartz E (2007) Oreochromis mossambicus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. http://iucnredlist.org. Accessed 9 February 2010

  • Canonico GC, Arthington A, McCrary JK, Thieme ML (2005) The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 15:463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charo-Karisa H, Rezk MA, Bovenhuis H, Komen H (2005) Heritability of cold tolerance in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, juveniles. Aquaculture 249:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Wiley EO, McNyset KM (2007) Ecological niche modeling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America. Biol Invasions 9:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chifamba PC (1998) Status of Oreochromis niloticus in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe, following escape from fish farms. In: Cowx IG (ed) Stocking and Introduction of Fish. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Pierce BA (2003) Rapid evolution of an established feral population (Oreochromis spp.): the need to incorporate invasion science into regulatory structures. Biol Invasions 5:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato ME, Esterhuyse MM, van der Waal BWC, Brink D, Volckaert AM (2007) Hybridisation and phylogeography of the Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus in southern Africa evidenced by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA genotyping. Conserv Genet 8:475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daget J, Gosse JP, Teugels GG, Thys van den Audenaerde DFE (1991) Check-list of the freshwater fishes of Africa (CLOFFA). ISNB, Brussels; MRAC, Tervuren; and ORSTOM, Paris. vol 4

  • DeVaney SC, McNyset KM, Williams JB, Peterson AT, Wiley EO (2009) A tale of four ‘‘carp’’: invasion potential and ecological niche modeling. PLoS ONE 4:e5451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 35:001–020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin JF, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MC, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ (2008) Data sets matter, but so do evolution and ecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:562–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getabu A (1994) A comparative study on feeding habits of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus) in Nyanza Gulf, Lake Victoria and sewage ponds. In: Okemwa E, Wakwabi E, Getabu A (eds) Recent trends of research on Lake Victoria fisheries. ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi, pp 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igushi K, Matsuura K, McNyset KM, Peterson AT, Scachetti-Pereira R, Powers K, Vieglais D, Wiley EO, Yodo T (2004) Predicting invasion of basses in Japan. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness J, Dooley J, Aguilar-Manjarrez J, Riva C (2007) African water resource database. GIS-based tools for inland aquatic resource management. 2. Technical manual and workbook. CIFA Technical Paper. No. 33, Part 2. FAO, Rome, 308 p

  • Jimenez-Valverde A (2012) Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discriminating measure in species distribution modeling. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Valverde A, Peterson AT, Soberon J, Overton JM, Aragón P (2011) Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments. Biol Invasions 13:2785–2797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney M, Porter W (2009) Mechanistic niche modeling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecol Lett 12:334–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo ML, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2007) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2007) Invasion ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe-McConnell RH (2000) The role of tilapias in ecosystems. In: Beveridge MCM, McAndrew BJ (eds) Tilapias: biology and exploitation. Kluwer, Dorderecht, pp 129–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mau-Crimmins T, Schussman HR, Geiger H (2006) Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native-range data? Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis ehmanniana) in the south-western United States. Ecol Model 19:736–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNyset KM (2005) Use of ecological niche modeling to predict distributions of freshwater fish species in Kansas. Ecol Freshw Fish 14:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njiru M, Okeyo-Owuor JB, Muchiri M, Cowx IG (2004) Shifts in the food of the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in Lake Victoria. Kenya Afr J Ecol 42:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. TREE 23:149–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2011) Ecological niche conservatism. A time structured review of evidence. J Biogeogr 38:817–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Nakazawa Y (2008) Environmental data sets in ecological niche modeling: an example of with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsisrichteri. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippart JCL, Ruwet JCL (1982) Ecology and distribution of tilapias. In: Pullin RSV, Lowe-McConnell RH (eds) The biology and culture of tilapias. International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICRAM) conference proceedings, vol 7, pp 15–60

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rödder D, Engler JO (2011) Quantitative metrics of overlaps in Grinnellian niches: advances and possible drawbacks. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:915–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rödder D, Lötters S (2009) Niche shift versus niche conservatism? Climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:674–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rödder D, Lötters S (2010) Explanative power of variables used in species distribution modeling: an issue of general model transferability or niche shift in the invasive green frog (Eleutherodactylus planirostris). Naturwissenschaften 97:781–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rödder D, Schmidtlein S, Veith M, Lötters S (2009) Alien invasive slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: a matter of niche shift or of predictors studied? PLoS ONE 4:e7843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross LG (2000) Environmental physiology and energetics. In: Beveridge MCM, McAndrew BJ (eds) Tilapias: biology and exploitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 89–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton PH (1994) Diversity and distribution of freshwater fishes in East and Southern Africa. In: Tuegels et al (ed) Biological diversity in African fresh and brackish water fishes. Annale Musée Royale de l’Afrique Centrale, Sciences Zoologique, vol 275, pp 95–131

  • Swets KA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas E (1983) Tilapiine fishes of the genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia. British Natural History Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweddle D (2010) Overview of the Zambezi River System: its History, fish fauna, fisheries and conservation. Aquat Ecosyst Health 13:224–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Wal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE (2009) Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Model 220:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren DL, Seifert SN (2011) Environmental niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol Appl 21:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2010) ENMtools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33:607–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber BL, Yates CJ, Le Maitre DC, Scott JK, Kriticos DJ, Ota N, McNeill A, Le Roux JJ, Midgley GF (2011) Modeling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models. Divers Distrib 17:978–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme RL (1988) International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fisheries technical paper, FAO, Rome

  • Weyl OLF (2008) Rapid invasion of a subtropical lake fishery in central Mozambique by Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 18:839–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB, Cornell HV, Damschen EI, Davies TJ, Grytnes JA, Harrison SP, Hawkins BA, Holt RD, McCain CM, Stephens PR (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett 13:1310–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RM, van Wilgen BW, Hill MP, Schulthess F, Tweddle D, Chabi-Olay A, Zimmermann HG (2007) The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Global Invasive Species Programme. CSIR/NRE/RBSD/ER/2007/0044/C

  • Zambrano L, Martínez-Meyer E, Menezes N, Peterson TA (2006) Invasive potential of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in American freshwater systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1903–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zengeya TA, Marshall BE (2007) Trophic interrelationships amongst cichlid fishes in a tropical African reservoir (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). Hydrobiologia 592:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zengeya TA, Robertson MP, Booth AJ, Chimimba CT (2012) A qualitative ecological risk assessment of the invasive Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus in a sub-tropical African river system (Limpopo River, South Africa). Mar Freshwat Ecosyst, Aquat Conserv. doi:10.1002/AQS.2258

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the South African Working for Water (WfW) Programme through the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (CIB), University of Pretoria, South Africa. We thank FishBase (http://www.fishbase.org) and Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; http://www.gbif.org) for access to their databases. We are grateful to Dan Warren from the University of Texas at Austin who provided a Perl script for large data sets and whose comments helped to improve an earlier version of this manuscript. We are also grateful to John Minshull, former Curator of Ichthyology at the Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, Shaft Nengu of the Department of Wildlife and National Parks in Botswana, Andrew Fenwick the Editor of African Fisherman Magazine, Maxwell Barson of the University of Zimbabwe, and Michelle Losseau, a Belgian field biologist currently based in Mozambique, for providing Nile tilapia occurrence data in their respective countries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsungai A. Zengeya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zengeya, T.A., Robertson, M.P., Booth, A.J. et al. Ecological niche modeling of the invasive potential of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in African river systems: concerns and implications for the conservation of indigenous congenerics. Biol Invasions 15, 1507–1521 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0386-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0386-7

Keywords

Navigation