Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spread of an invasive grass in closed-canopy deciduous forests across local and regional environmental gradients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spread of Microstegium vimineum, an invasive exotic grass, in closed-canopy forests of West Virginia, U.S. was evaluated across a local (roadside to forest interior) and regional (across two geographic provinces) environmental gradient. Seed dispersal distances from roadside populations into forest interiors based on seed rain and soil seed bank data were determined. Colonization and extinction of M. vimineum patches were followed over three years (2005–2007), and spread rate was estimated using a reaction-diffusion model. Direct seed dispersal from the roadside populations occurred primarily adjacent to the maternal plants, indicating that the disjunct M. vimineum patches within the forest interiors occurred via secondary seed dispersal over longer distances. Patches of M. vimineum were found as far as 45 m into the forest interior, but M. vimineum seed in the seed bank were only found within 10 m of the roadside population. Colonization rates of the forest interiors were significantly higher for the more mesic sites than the more xeric sites. The same trend was noted for the spread rate. Radial spread rates ranged between 0.16 and 0.50 m year−1 and forest interiors were estimated to become saturated with M. vimineum in anywhere between 10 (more mesic sites) and 59 (more xeric sites) years. These results support the possibility of accelerating spread rates in forest interiors caused by more long-distance dispersal events, but slowed by a reduction in M. vimineum fitness in shaded or relatively dry environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ITIS:

Integrated Taxonomic Information System

MNF:

Monongahela National Forest

PAR:

Photosynthetically active radiation

R–V:

Ridge and Valley Province

References

  • Allen LJS, Allen EJ, Kunst CRG, Sosebee RE (1991) A diffusion model for dispersal of Opuntia imbricata (cholla) on rangeland. J Ecol 79:1123–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barden LS (1987) Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplain. Am Midl Nat 118:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (1998) Seed dispersal and seedling establishment in grass populations. In: Cheplick GP (ed) Population biology of grasses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 84–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (2005) Biomass partitioning and reproductive allocation in the invasive, cleistogamous grass Microstegium vimineum: influence of the light environment. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christen D, Matlack G (2006) The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Conserv Biol 20(2):385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge K, Franklin SB (2002) Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 4:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Lewis M, Horvath L (2001) Invasion by extremes: population spread with variation in dispersal and reproduction. Am Nat 157:537–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson RB (1964) Tumolt on the mountains—Lumbering in West Virginia—1770–1920. McClain Printing Company, Parsons, WV, 402 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2004) Environmental correlates of the distribution and abundance of Microstegium vimineum, in East Tennessee. Southeast Nat 3:545–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2005) Light limitation creates patchy distribution of an invasive grass in eastern deciduous forests. Biol Invasions 7:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B (1999) Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. TREE 14:405–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eschtruth AK, Battles JJ (2008) Acceleration of exotic plant invasion in a forested ecosystem by a generalist herbivore. Conserv Biol 23(2):388–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrothers DE, Gray JR (1972) Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Graminaceae) in the United States. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugen 7:355–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Frappier B, Lee TD, Olson KF, Eckert RT (2003) Small-scale invasion pattern, spread rate, and lag-phase behavior of Rhamnus frangula L. For Ecol Manage 186:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert B, Lechowicz MJ (2005) Invasibility and abiotic gradients: the positive correlation between native and exotic plant diversity. Ecology 86(7):1848–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1993) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, 2nd edn. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, 910 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom MJ (1998) Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horton JJ, Neufeld HS (1998) Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner CD (2003) Vulnerability of oak-dominated forests in West Virginia to invasive exotic plants: temporal and spatial patterns of nine exotic species using herbarium records and land classification data. Castanea 68:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner CD (2009, this issue) Establishment of an invasive grass in closed-canopy deciduous forests across local and regional environmental gradients. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9609-y

  • Hulme PE (2003) Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war? Oryx 37:178–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). Retrieved from http://www.itis.gov/ on 2 December 2008

  • Kot M, Lewis MA, van den Driessche P (1996) Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77:2027–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kot M, Medlock J, Reluga T, Walton DB (2004) Stochasticity, invasions, and branching random walks. Theor Popul Biol 66:175–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1998) Demographic stochasticity and Allee effect on a scale with isotropic noise. Oikos 83:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latore J, Gould P, Mortimer AM (1998) Spatial dynamics and critical patch size of annual plant populations. J Theor Biol 190:277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA, Kareiva P (1993) Allee dynamics and the spread of invading organisms. Theor Popul Biol 43:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale WM (1993) Rates of spread of an invading species—Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. J Ecol 81:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall AS, Boucher J, Turkington R, Bradfield GE (2006) Patterns of plant invasion along an environmental stress gradient. J Veg Sci 17:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7(3):142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters RA, Sheley RL (2001) Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J Rangeland Manage 54:502–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1994) Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75(5):1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody ME, Mack RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25:1009–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert MG, Caswell H (2000) Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81:1613–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert MG, Parker IM (2004) Projecting rates of spread for invasive species. Risk Anal 24:817–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA National Climate Center Data (NCDC). Retrieved from http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwDI~SelectStation~USA~WV on 3 December 2008

  • Redman DE (1995) Distribution and habitat types for Nepal Microstegium [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) Camus] in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Castanea 60:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77(6):1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E, Engen S (2004) Stochastic population theory faces reality in the laboratory. Trends Ecol Evol 19:351–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8(94):1170–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Takeda Y (1995) Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. Am Nat 146:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (1990) Introduction to plant population ecology, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, 229 pp

  • Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM, Hastings A (2004) Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density-structured model for Spartina alternifolia. J Appl Ecol 41:1049–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster CR, Rock JH, Froese RE, Jenkins MA (2008) Drought-herbivory interaction disrupts competitive displacement of native plants by Microstegium vimineum, 10-year results. Oecologia 157:497–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 23(3):136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter K, Schmitt MR, Edwards GE (1982) Microstegium vimineum, a shade adapted C4 grass. Plant Sci Lett 24:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The USDA Forest Service funded this research. Sincere thanks go to H. Smith, M. McKissik, W. Laubscher, G. Short, J. Quinn, and L. Strickler for their help in data collection. We also thank P. Tobin, J. Stanovick, D. Simberloff, and two anonymous reviewers for their editorial comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA

    Cynthia D. Huebner

Authors
  1. Cynthia D. Huebner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia D. Huebner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huebner, C.D. Spread of an invasive grass in closed-canopy deciduous forests across local and regional environmental gradients. Biol Invasions 12, 2081–2089 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9610-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9610-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation