Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restoring restoration: removal of the invasive plant Microstegium vimineum from a North Carolina wetland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Restoration sites are vulnerable to plant invasions due to habitat and resource alteration. We conducted an invasive plant-removal study at a wetland restoration in the North Carolina Piedmont, a site dominated by the non-native invasive, Microstegium vimineum. Paired plots (M. vimineum hand-weeded and unweeded) were established and maintained to monitor response of plant species richness and diversity. Plots increased from 4 to 15 species m−2 after three growing seasons of M. vimineum removal and 90% of the newly establishing species were native. Weeding ceased in the fourth growing season and M. vimineum rapidly re-invaded. Formerly weeded plots increased to 59% (±11% SE) M. vimineum cover, 25 of 51 plant species disappeared from the plots, and species richness decreased to an average of <8 species m−2. Our results show that we can quickly establish an abundant, diverse community with invasive removal, but that persistent effort is required to monitor and maintain the long-term viability of this community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barden LS (1987) Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C-4 grass, into a North-Carolina floodplain. Am Midl Nat 118:40–45. doi:10.2307/2425626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology, individuals, populations and communities. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge R, Franklin S (2002) Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 4:339–347. doi:10.1023/A:1023671006342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole CA (1999) Ecological theory and its role in the rehabilitation of wetlands. In: Streever WR (ed) An international perspective on wetland rehabilitation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 232–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2004) Environmental correlates of the distribution and abundance of Microstegium vimineum, in east Tennessee. Southeast Nat 3:545–562. doi:10.1656/1528-7092(2004)003[0545:ECOTDA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Meyerson LA (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restor Ecol 10:703–713. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01051.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl T (1990) Wetlands losses in the United States 1780s to 1980s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, 13 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior; Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, 112 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems (N Y, Print) 6:503–523. doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0151-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Muthuen, London

  • Fairbrothers DE, Gray JR (1972) Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:97–100. doi:10.2307/2484205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ, Spyreas G, Benedict J (2002) Life history of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an invasive grass in southern Illinois. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:207–219. doi:10.2307/3088771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefner J, Wilen B, Dahl T, Frayer W (1994) Southeast wetlands: status and trends, mid-1970s to mid-1980s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, 32 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9:761–770. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040761.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1998) Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol Monogr 68:121–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy TA, Naeem S, Howe KM, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Reich P (2002) Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–638. doi:10.1038/nature00776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB (1964) Nonmetric multidimentional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129. doi:10.1007/BF02289694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, 853 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather PM (1976) Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. Wiley, London, p 532

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD for windows: multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Wilson RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol Appl 6:77–83. doi:10.2307/2269554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Wu XY, Nairn RW, Weihe PE, Wang NM, Deal R, Boucher CE (1998) Creating and restoring wetlands—a whole-ecosystem experiment in self-design. Bioscience 48:1019–1030. doi:10.2307/1313458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse JM, Galatowitsch SM (2003) Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-reflooding. Plant Ecol 169:143–159. doi:10.1023/A:1026221302606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Wetlands Policy Forum (1988) Protecting America’s wetlands: an action agenda. Conservation Foundation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt CM, Oswalt SN, Clatterbuck WK (2007) Effects of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus on native woody species density and diversity in a productive mixed-hardwood forest in Tennessee. For Ecol Manage 242:727–732. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman DE (1995) Distribution and habitat types for Nepal Microstegium in Maryland and the district of Columbia. Castanea 60:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom EW, Van der Valk AG (2003) Plant diversity, composition, and invasion of restored and natural prairie pothole wetlands: implications for restoration. Wetlands 23:1–12. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0001:PDCAIO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2005) Plants profile; Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. In: Plants database. United States Department of Agriculture. Available via. http://www.plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?keywordquery=microstegium+vimineum&mode=sciname. Accessed 15 Jan 2005

  • USDA (2008) Plants database. United States Department of Agriculture. Available via. www.plants.usda.gov. Accessed 4 Apr 2008

  • Van der Valk AG (1998) Succession theory and restoration of wetland vegetation. In: McComb AJ, Davis J (eds) Wetlands for the future. Gleneagles Publishing Adelaide, Australia, pp 657–667

    Google Scholar 

  • WSSA (2008) Composite list of weeds. Weed Science Society of America. Available via. http://www.wssa.net/Weeds/ID/WeedNames/namesearch.php. Accessed 4 Apr 2008

  • Zedler JB, Callaway JC (1999) Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7:69–73. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:431–452. doi:10.1080/07352680490514673

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to give a special thank you to Dr. Mengchi Ho for extensive help with plant surveys and plant identification. Thanks to Karen Hall and Barbara Doll for use of the Yates Millpond site, and to Dr. Dean Urban and Dr. Nicolette Cagle for help with the NMS ordination. This research was supported by funds from the Budweiser Conservation Fellowship, the Society of Wetland Scientists Student Grants, and the Graduate School of Duke University. We appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel deB. Richter.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7.

Table 7 Targeted impacts of M. vimineum; the average difference between the weeded plots and the M. vimineum plots when M. vimineum was removed from the not weeded statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeMeester, J.E., deB. Richter, D. Restoring restoration: removal of the invasive plant Microstegium vimineum from a North Carolina wetland. Biol Invasions 12, 781–793 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9481-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9481-9

Keywords

Navigation