Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a comparison of foliar insect herbivory of the exotic Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and the native sugar maple (A. saccharum L.)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Norway maple (Acer platanoides) is a Eurasian introduced tree species which has invaded the North American range of its native congener, sugar maple (A. saccharum). One hypothesis used to explain the success of an invasive species is the enemy release hypothesis (ERH), which states that invasive species are often particularly successful in their new range because they lack the enemies of their native range. In this study, we hypothesized that Norway maple would have less insect damage than sugar maple due to such enemy release. Autumn 2005 and summer 2006 leaves of Norway and sugar maple were collected from six sites in New Jersey and Pennsylvania to compare percent leaf area loss, gall damage, fungal damage, and specific leaf area (cm2/g). Although both species had low overall mean levels of leaf damage (0.4–2.5%), in both years/seasons Norway maple had significantly less leaf damage than sugar maple. Insects were also collected to compare insect assemblies present on each tree species. The numbers of insect taxa and individuals found on each species were nearly equivalent. Overall, the results of this study are consistent with the enemy release hypothesis for Norway maple. In addition, sugar maples when surrounded by Norway maples tended to show reduced herbivory. This suggests that the spread of Norway maple in North America, by reducing amounts of insect herbivory, may have further ecosystem-wide impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JM, Fung W, Sullivan R, Cipollini D, TRAIN members (2008). Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) has three times as much herbivory in its native range in Europe as in its introduced range in North America. Biol Invasions (in press)

  • Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM (2003) Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol Lett 6:712–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos JN (2005) Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979–2989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldea M, Hamilton JG, Resti JP, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, DeLucia EH (2005) Indirect effects of insect herbivory on leaf gas exchange in soybean. Plant Cell Environ 28:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR, O’Dowd DJ (1976) Plant defense guilds. Science 93:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley S, Whittaker JB, Malloch AJC (1980) Field experiments on the effects of grazing by a Chrysomelid beetle (Gastrophysa viridula) on seed production and quality in Rumex obtusifolius and Rumex crispus. J Ecol 68:671–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borror DJ, White RE (1970) Peterson field guides: insects. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Lawton JH, Grubb PJ (1991) Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 333(1267):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory, the dynamics of animal–plant interactions. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Ickes K (2004) Natural enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of the invasive tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85:471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz H, Wirth LR, Buschmann H (2004) Variation in herbivore damage to invasive and native woody plant species in open forest vegetation on Mahe, Seychelles. Biol Invasions 6:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Chapman and Hall, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalten J, Price PW (1997) Can plants gain protection from herbivory by association with unpalatable neighbors? A field experiment in a willow-sawfly system. Oikos 78(2):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntly N (1991) Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22:477–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH (1991) Plant chemistry and insect species richness of British umbellifers. J Anim Ecol 60:767–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongejans E, Sheppard AW, Shea K (2006) What controls the population dynamics of the invasive thistle Carduus nutans in its native range? J Appl Ecol 43(5):877–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloeppel BD, Abrams MD (1995) Ecophysiological attributes of the native Acer saccharum and the exotic Acer platanoides in urban oak forests in Pennsylvania, USA. Tree Physiol 15:739–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson CL (1998) The impact of two gall-forming arthropods on the photosynthetic rates of their hosts. Oecologia 115:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TT, Lechowicz MJ (1998) Diverse responses of maple seedlings to forest light regimes. Ann Bot 82:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Stiling P, Pemberton RW (2007) Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congeners. Biol Invasions 9:773–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes DB, Berger RD (2001) The effects of rust and anthracnose on the photosynthetic competence of diseased bean leaves. Phytopathology 91:212–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowman MD, Heatwole H (1992) Spatial and temporal variability in defoliation of Australian eucalypts. Ecology 73(1):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH (1999) Norway maple (Acer platanoides) invasion of a natural forest stand: understory consequence and regeneration pattern. Biol Invasions 1:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiners SJ (2005) Seed and seedling ecology of Acer saccharum and Acer platanoides: a contrast between native and exotic congeners. North East Nat 12:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiners SJ, Handel SN, Pickett STA (2000) Tree seedling establishment under insect herbivory: edge effects and interannual variation. Plant Ecol 151:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive species and fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (1990) History and range of Norway maple. J Arboriculture 16:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykanen H, Koricheva J (2004) Damage-induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Oikos 104:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2004) Soil biota facilitate exotic Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol Appl 14:1737–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AH, Lindquist OH (1982) Insects of eastern hardwood trees. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Hull, Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Kaunzinger CK (1993) Biological invasion of the Drew University (New Jersey) Forest Preserve by Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). Bull Torey Bot Club 120:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Dwyer M, Kaunzinger CK, Wyckoff PH (2000) The myth of the resilient forest: case study of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Rhodora 102:332–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Pendergast TH, Dwyer ME (2001) Response of native and exotic maple seedling banks to removal of the exotic, invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). J Torrey Bot Soc 128:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker JB, Warrington S (1985) An experimental field study of different levels of insect herbivory induced by Formica rufa predation on Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) III. Effects on tree growth. J Appl Ecol 22:797–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LM (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am Nat 160:705–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wychoff PH, Webb SL (1996) Understory influence of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Bull Torrey Bot Soc 123:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Hamilton JG, Miller TJ, Crofts AR, Oxborough K, Berenbaum MR, de Lucia EH (2002) Impact of folivory on photosynthesis is greater than the sum of its holes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(2):1088–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Sara Webb (Drew University), Jose-Luis Machado (Swarthmore College), and Nora Wagner (Duke Farms) for providing access to sites used in this research. Thanks to Terry Malcolm for providing much needed guidance in the statistical aspect of this work and to Vincent Koczurik for assisting in insect identification. We would also like to thank Yangjian Zhang, Jack Chapman, Melanie Kaeser, and Mary Killilea, for their support and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cincotta, C.L., Adams, J.M. & Holzapfel, C. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a comparison of foliar insect herbivory of the exotic Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and the native sugar maple (A. saccharum L.). Biol Invasions 11, 379–388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9255-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9255-9

Keywords

Navigation