Abstract
Purpose
Viruses, such as Ebola virus (EBOV), evolve rapidly and threaten the human health. There is a great demand to exploit efficient gene-editing techniques for the identification of virus to probe virulence mechanism for drug development.
Methods
Based on lambda Red recombination in Escherichia coli (E. coli), counter-selection, and in vitro annealing, a high-efficiency genetic method was utilized here for precisely engineering viruses. EBOV trVLPs assay and dual luciferase reporter assay were used to further test the effect of mutations on virus replication.
Results
Considering the significance of matrix protein VP24 in EBOV replication, the types of mutations within vp24, including several single-base substitutions, one double-base substitution, two seamless deletions, and one targeted insertion, were generated on the multi-copy plasmid of E. coli. Further, the length of the homology arms for recombination and in vitro annealing, and the amount of DNA cassettes and linear plasmids were optimized to create a more elaborate and cost-efficient protocol than original approach. The effects of VP24 mutations on the expression of a reporter gene (luciferase) from the EBOV minigenome were determined, and results indicated that mutations of key sites within VP24 have significant impacts on EBOV replication.
Conclusion
This precise mutagenesis method will facilitate effective and simple editing of viral genes in E. coli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banadyga L, Dolan MA, Ebihara H (2016) Rodent-adapted filoviruses and the molecular basis of pathogenesis. J Mol Biol 428(17):3449–3466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2016.05.008
Backes N, Phillips GJ (2021) Repurposing CRISPR-Cas systems as genetic tools for the enterobacteriales. EcoSal Plus9(2):eESP00062020. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0006-2020
Beitzel B, Hulseberg CE, Palacios G (2019) Reverse genetics systems as tools to overcome the genetic diversity of Lassa virus. Curr Opin Virol 37:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2019.06.011
Cantoni D, Rossman JS (2018) Ebolaviruses: New roles for old proteins. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12(5):e0006349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006349
Chen PJ, Liu DR (2022) Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation. Nat Rev Genet24(3):161-177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00541-1
Harrison AR, David CT, Rawlinson SM, Moseley GW (2021) The ebola virus interferon antagonist VP24 undergoes active nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Viruses 13(8):1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13081650
Hoenen T, Watt A, Mora A, Feldmann H (2014) Modeling the lifecycle of ebola virus under biosafety level 2 conditions with virus-like particles containing tetracistronic minigenomes. J Vis Exp(91):52381. https://doi.org/10.3791/52381
Hosseini N, Khanahmad H, Esfahani B, Bandehpour M, Shariati L, Zahedi N, Kazemi B (2020) Targeting of cholera toxin A (ctxA) gene by zinc finger nuclease: pitfalls of using gene editing tools in prokaryotes. Res Pharm Sci 15(2):182-190. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.283818
Hoffmann H-H, Sánchez-Rivera FJ, Schneider WM, Luna JM et al (2021) Functional interrogation of a SARS-CoV-2 host protein interactome identifies unique and shared coronavirus host factors. Cell Host Microbe 29(2):267-280.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.009
Ichinose M, Kawabata M, Akaiwa Y, Shimajiri Y et al (2022) U-to-C RNA editing by synthetic PPR-DYW proteins in bacteria and human culture cells. Commun Biol 5(1):968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03927-3
Knott GJ, Doudna JA (2018) CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science 361(6405):866–869. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5011
Kulkarni TA, Bade AN, Sillman B, Shetty BLD et al (2020) A year-long extended release nanoformulated cabotegravir prodrug. Nat Mater 19(8):910–920. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0674-z
Mateo M, Carbonnelle C, Martinez MJ, Reynard O, Page A, Volchkova VA, Volchkov VE (2011) Knockdown of ebola virus VP24 impairs viral nucleocapsid assembly and prevents virus replication. J Infect Dis 204 Suppl 3:S892-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir311
Muyrers JP, Zhang Y, Testa G, Stewart AF (1999) Rapid modification of bacterial artificial chromosomes by ET- recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 27(6):1555-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.6.1555
Pujanandez L (2017) Fighting filoviruses with antibody therapy. Science 356(6333):37–38. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6333.37-g
Romito M, Juillerat A, Kok YL, Hildenbeutel M et al (2021) Preclinical evaluation of a novel TALEN targeting CCR5 confirms efficacy and safety in conferring resistance to HIV-1 infection. Biotechnol J 16(1):e2000023. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000023
Sabzehei F, Kouhpayeh S, Dastjerdeh MS, Khanahmad H et al (2017) A novel prokaryotic green fluorescent protein expression system for testing gene editing tools activity like zinc finger nuclease. Adv Biomed Res 6:155. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.219420
Sarker S (2022) Special issue emerging wildlife viral diseases. Viruses 14(4):807. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14040807
Song C, Luan J, Li R, Jiang C et al (2020) RedEx: a method for seamless DNA insertion and deletion in large multimodular polyketide synthase gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 48(22):e130. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa956
Sun N, Zhao H (2013) Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs): a highly efficient and versatile tool for genome editing. Biotechnol Bioeng 110(7):1811-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24890
Takamatsu Y, Kolesnikova L, Schauflinger M, Noda T, Becker S (2020) The integrity of the YxxL Motif of ebola virus VP24 Is important for the transport of nucleocapsid-like structures and for the regulation of viral RNA synthesis. J Virol 94(9):e02170-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02170-19
Tong Y, Jørgensen TS, Whitford CM, Weber T, Lee SY (2021) A versatile genetic engineering toolkit for E. coli based on CRISPR-prime editing. Nat Commun 12(1):5206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25541-3
Wang H, Bian X, Xia L, Ding X, Müller R, Zhang Y, Fu J, Stewart AF (2014) Improved seamless mutagenesis by recombineering using ccdB for counterselection. Nucleic Acids Res 42(5):e37. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1339
Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS (2016) CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu Rev Biochem 85:227-64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014607
Wang H, Li Z, Jia R, Yin J et al (2018) ExoCET: exonuclease in vitro assembly combined with RecET recombination for highly efficient direct DNA cloning from complex genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 46(5):e28. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1249
Wang Y, Huang C, Zhao W (2022) Recent advances of the biological and biomedical applications of CRISPR/Cas systems. Mol Biol Rep 49(7):7087-7100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07519-6
Xu C, He X, Zheng Z, Zhang Z et al (2014) Downregulation of MicroRNA miR-526a by enterovirus inhibits RIG-I-dependent innate immune response. J Virol 88(19):11356-68. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01400-14
Yang XW, Model P, Heintz N (1997) Homologous recombination based modification in Esherichia coli and germline transmission in transgenic mice of a bacterial artificial chromsome. Nat Biotechnol 15(9):859-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0997-859
Zhang Y, Li M (2021) Genome editing technologies as cellular defense against viral pathogens. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:716344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.716344
Zheng K, Jiang FF, Su L, Wang X, Chen YX, Chen HC, Liu ZF (2020) Highly efficient base editing in viral genome based on bacterial artificial chromosome using a Cas9-Cytidine deaminase fused protein. Virol Sin 35(2):191-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-019-00175-4
Zhu L, Gao T, Huang Y, Jin J et al (2022) Ebola virus VP35 hijacks the PKA-CREB1 pathway for replication and pathogenesis by AKIP1 association. Nat Commun 13(1):2256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29948-4
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof. Hailong Wang from Shandong University, China, for providing E. coli GBred-gyrA462, E. coli GB2005 and plasmid pR6K-neo-ccdB.
Supporting information
Supplementary Figure 1— Restriction analysis of obtained clones during the process of constructing mutants.
Supplementary Figure 2— BamHI+HindIII restriction analysis of M1* (recombinant plasmids) obtained in LCHR using different amounts of DNA cassette.
Supplementary Figure 3— HindIII restriction analysis of M1* (recombinant plasmids) obtained in LCHR using different lengths of homology arm (ha).
Supplementary Figure 4— HindIII restriction analysis of M1 obtained in vitro annealing using different amounts of linear plasmid.
Supplementary Figure 5— HindIII restriction analysis of M1 obtained in vitro annealing using different lengths of circularized homology arm (ca).
Supplementary Table 1— Primers used in this study.
Supplementary Table 2— Colony numbers per mL of recovery cultures after electroporation and the editing efficiency in different conditions.
Funding
This work was supported by the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 2208085Y09), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 32170073 and 31972930), and the Natural Science Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province (Grant nos. KJ2021A0077 and 2022AH050063).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JY: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and original draft writing. MFZ: methodology and investigation. LBL: formal analysis and data curation. PPW: investigation. HW, LZ, CZX and BCZ: supervision, project administration, and writing-reviewing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work currently reported.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, J., Zhang, M., Zhu, L. et al. High-efficiency genetic engineering toolkit for virus based on lambda red-mediated recombination. Biotechnol Lett 45, 1327–1337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03412-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03412-9