Abstract
During storage of moist animal feed, growth of detrimental fungi causing spoilage, or being mycotoxigenic or pathogenic, is a severe problem. Addition of biopreservative yeasts or lactic acid bacteria can significantly reduce this problem. However, their use requires several careful considerations. One is the safety to the animal, humans and the environment, tightly connected to legal aspects and the need for pre-market authorisation when supplementing feed with microorganisms. Although both yeasts and lactic acid bacteria are considered comparatively safe organisms due to low production of toxic metabolites, it is of great importance to understand the mechanisms behind the biopreservative abilities. Another important issue concerns practical aspects, such as the economic production of large amounts of the organisms and the development of a suitable formulation giving the organisms a long shelf life. These aspects are discussed and a recommendation of this review is that both safety and formulation aspects of a specific microbe should be considered at an early stage in the selection of new organisms with biopreservation potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abadias M, Teixido N, Usall J, Solsona C, Vinas I (2005) Survival of the postharvest biocontrol yeast Candida sake CPA-1 after dehydration by spray-drying. Biocontrol Sci Technol 15:835–846
Abadias M, Usall J, Teixido N, Vinas I (2003) Liquid formulation of the postharvest biocontrol agent Candida sake CPA-1 in isotonic solutions. Phytopathology 93:436–442
Bayrock D, Ingledew WM (1997) Fluidized bed drying of baker’s yeast: moisture levels, drying rates, and viability changes during drying. Food Res Int 30:407–415
Clevström G, Möller T, Göransson B, Liljensjöö A, Ljunggren H (1989) Influence of formic acid on fungal flora of barley and on aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus Link. Mycopathologia 107:101–109
Costa E, Teixido N, Usall J, Fons E, Gimeno V, Delgado J, Vinas I (2002) Survival of Pantoea agglomerans strain CPA-2 in a spray-drying process. J Food Prot 65:185–191
da Costa MS, Santos H, Galinski EA (1998) An overview of the role and diversity of compatible solutes in Bacteria and Archaea. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 61:117–153
De Clercq D, Cognet S, Pujol M, Lepoivre P, Jijakli MH (2003) Development of a SCAR marker and a semi-selective medium for specific quantification of Pichia anomala strain K on apple fruit surfaces. Postharvest Biol Tech 29:237–247
Druvefors U, Jonsson N, Boysen ME, Schnürer J (2002) Efficacy of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala during long-term storage of moist feed grain under different oxygen and carbon dioxide regimens. FEMS Yeast Res 2:389–394
Druvefors UÄ, Passoth V, Schnürer J (2005) Nutrient effect on biocontrol of Penicillium roqueforti by Pichia anomala J121 in cereal grain. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1865–1869
Fonseca F, Passot S, Lieben P, Marin M (2004) Collapse temperature of bacterial suspensions: the effect of cell type and concentration. Cryoletters 25:425–434
Garcia De Castro A, Bredholt H, Strom AR, Tunnacliffe A (2000) Anhydrobiotic engineering of gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4142–4144
Hermosa MR, Grondona I, Diaz-Minguez JM, Iturriaga EA, Monte E (2001) Development of a strain-specific SCAR marker for the detection of Trichoderma atroviride 11, a biological control agent against soil borne fungal plant pathogens. Cur Genet 38:343–350
Hohmann S, Mager WH (2003) Yeast stress reponses. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg
Jijakli MH, Lepoivre P (1998) Characterization of an exo-beta-1,3-glucanase produced by Pichia anomala strain K, antagonist of Botrytis cinerea on apples. Phytopathology 88:335–343
Kabak B, Dobson ADW, Var I (2006) Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46:593–619
Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (1998) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Lelieveld HLM, Bachmayer H, Boon B, Brunius G et al (1995) Safe Biotechnology.6. Safety assessment, in respect of human health, of microorganisms used in Biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotech 43:389–393
Lindgren SE, Dobrogosz WJ (1990) Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations. FEMS Microbiol Rev 87:149–163
List of GRAS approved substances (2006) Food and drug administration USA. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼rdb/opa-gras.html
Luna-Solano G, Salgado-Cervantes MA, Rodriguez-Jimenes GC, Garcia-Alvarado MA (2005) Optimization of brewer’s yeast spray drying process. J Food Engin 68:9–18
Magan N (2006) Mycotoxin contamination of food in Europe: early detection and prevention strategies. Mycopathologia 162:245–253
Masih EI, Alie I, Paul B (2000) Can the grey mould disease of the grape-vine be controlled by yeast? FEMS Microbiol Let 189:233–237
Melin P, Håkansson S, Eberhard TH, Schnürer J (2006) Survival of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala after long-term storage in liquid formulations and different temperatures, assessed by flow cytometry. J Appl Microbiol 100:264–271
Melin P, Håkansson S, Schnürer J (2007) Optimization of liquid and dry formulations of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala. Appl Microbiol Biotech 73:1008–1016
Morgan CA, Herman N, White PA, Vesey G (2006) Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; a review. J Microbiol Met 66:183–193
Passoth V, Fredlund E, Druvefors UA, Schnurer J (2006) Biotechnology, physiology and genetics of the yeast Pichia anomala. FEMS Yeast Res 6:3–13
Petersson S, Jonsson N, Schnürer J (1999) Pichia anomala as a biocontrol agent during storage of high-moisture feed grain under airtight conditions. Post Biol Tech 15:175–184
Petersson S, Schnürer J (1995) Biocontrol of mold growth in high moisture wheat stored under airtight conditions by Pichia anomala, Pichia guilliermondii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1027–1032
Petersson S, Schnürer J (1998) Pichia anomala as a biocontrol agent of Penicillium roqueforti in high-moisture wheat, rye, barley, and oats stored under airtight conditions. Can J Microbiol 44:471–476
Pick E, Noren O, Nielsen V (1989) Energy consumption and input–output relations of field operations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
Roser B, Colaco C (1993) A sweeter way to fresher food. New Sci 138:24–28
Schisler DA, Slininger RJ, Behle RW, Jackson MA (2004) Formulation of Bacillus spp. for biological control of plant diseases. Phytopathology 94:1267–1271
Schnürer J, Magnusson J (2005) Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:70–78
Schoug S, Olsson J, Carlfors J, Schnürer J, Håkansson S (2006) Freeze-drying of Lactobacillus coryniformis Si3-effects of sucrose concentration, cell density, and freezing rate on cell survival and thermophysical properties. Cryobiology 53:119–127
Scudamore KA, Livesey CT (1998) Occurrence and significance of mycotoxins in forage crops and silage: a review. J Sci Food Agric 77:1–17
Skrobek A, Boss D, Defago G, Butt TM, Maurhofer M (2006) Evaluation of different biological test systems to assess the toxicity of metabolites from fungal biocontrol agents. Toxicology Let 161:43–52
Slininger PJ, VanCauwenberge JE, Bothast RJ, Weller DM, Thomashow LS, Cook R (1996) Effect of growth culture physiological state, metabolites, and formulation on the viability, phytotoxicity, and efficacy of the take-all biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 stored encapsulated on wheat seeds. Appl Microbiol Biotech 45:391–398
Stortz GT, Hengge-Aronis R (2000) Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington
Ström K, Schnürer J, Melin P (2005) Co-cultivation of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 and Aspergillus nidulans, evaluation of effects on fungal growth and protein expression. FEMS Microbiol Let 246:119–124
Ström K, Sjögren J, Broberg A, Schnürer J (2002) Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo(L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo(L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4322–4327
Torres R, Usall J, Teixido N, Abadias M, Vinas I (2003) Liquid formulation of the biocontrol agent Candida sake by modifying water activity or adding protectants. J Appl Microbiol 94:330–339
Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (1989) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables—an emerging technology. An Rev Phytopath 27:425–441
Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME, Biles CL, McLaughlin R, Chalutz E, Droby S (1991) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables—alternatives to synthetic fungicides. Crop Prot 10:172–177
Yiannikouris A, Jouany JP (2002) Mycotoxins in feeds and their fate in animals: a review. Animal Res 51:81–99
Zhang SA, Schisler DA, Boehm MJ, Slininger PJ (2005) Carbon to nitrogen ratio and carbon loading of production media influence freeze-drying survival and biocontrol efficacy of Cryptococcus nodaensis OH 182.9. Phytopathology 95:626–631
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), and by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA) by funding the research programme Domestication of Microorganisms (DOM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melin, P., Sundh, I., Håkansson, S. et al. Biological preservation of plant derived animal feed with antifungal microorganisms: safety and formulation aspects. Biotechnol Lett 29, 1147–1154 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9375-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9375-9