Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring the effects of Rodolia cardinalis on Icerya purchasi populations on the Galapagos Islands

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In January 2002, the first biological control program was implemented on the Galapagos Islands with the release of the Australian coccinellid Rodolia cardinalis Mulsant to control the invasive cottony cushion scale, Icerya purchasi Maskell. This was the first time that Galapagos authorities had approved the introduction of a biological control agent to this iconic archipelago and, because of this precedent, it was important to monitor and evaluate its behaviour soon after its introduction. Surveys were carried out after the release of R. cardinalis in 2002 to confirm establishment on Santa Cruz Island. In 2009, seven years post-release, a broader survey was done to document spread throughout the archipelago. Directly after the release of R. cardinalis in 2002, a predator exclusion study and field observations were carried out on scale insect populations on white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa [L.] Gaertn. F.) on Santa Cruz Island to document impact. In less than three months after R. cardinalis was released in 2002, populations of I. purchasi on white mangrove that were exposed to the predator in the exclusion experiment, or were monitored in the field, had declined by 99–100%. Results suggest that R. cardinalis played a key role in this decline, possibly in combination with high rainfall. Rodolia cardinalis dispersed quickly after its release and by 2009 was found in a wide variety of habitats on seven of the eight islands surveyed that had records of I. purchasi. Two of these were self-introductions. Further monitoring is recommended to determine whether this biological control agent has successfully reduced scale insect numbers on other valued plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton J, Fowler SV, Gianotti AF, Winks CJ (2007) Successful biological control of mist flower (Ageratina riparia) in New Zealand: agent establishment, impact and benefits to the native flora. Biol Control 40:370–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B (1999) Before, during and after: the need for long-term monitoring in invasive plant species management. Biol Invasions 1:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causton CE (2001) Dossier on Rodolia cardinalis Mulsant (Coccinellidae: Cocinellinae) a potential biological control agent for the cottony cushion scale Icerya purchasi Maskell (Margarodidae). Charles Darwin Foundation, Galapagos, Unpublished report

    Google Scholar 

  • Causton CE (2003) Ensuring compatibility of biological control of Icerya purchasi Maskell with conservation in Galapagos: development of procedure to evaluate risk. In: van Driesche RG (ed) Proceedings of the First International Symposium for the Biological Control of Arthropods, HI. FHTET-03–05. USDA-FS, Morgantown, USA, pp 448–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Causton CE (2009) Success in biological control: the scale and the ladybird. In: DeRoy T (ed) Preserving Darwin’s legacy, Galapagos, pp 184–190

  • Causton CE, Lincango MP, Poulsom TGA (2004) Feeding range studies of Rodolia cardinalis (Mulsant), candidate biological control agent of Icerya purchasi Maskell in the Galápagos islands. Biol Control 29(3):315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causton CE, Peck SB, Sinclair BJ, Roque-Albelo L, Hodgson CJ, Landry B (2006) Alien insects: threats and implications for the conservation of the Galápagos Islands. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDF (2011) Charles Darwin Foundation Climate Database. http://www.darwinfoundation.org/datazone/climate/. Cited October 2011

  • Dudley TL, Kazmer DJ (2005) Field assessment of the risk posed by Diorhabda elongata a biocontrol agent for control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) to a nontarget plant, Frankenia salina. Biol Control 35:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessl B, Young HG, Young RP, Rodríguez-Matamoros J, Dvorak M, Tebbich S, Fa JE (2010) How to save the rarest Darwin’s finch from extinction: the mangrove finch on Isabela Island. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr G, Wratten S (2000) Biological control: measures of success. CABI, Wallingford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincango M, Hodgson C, Causton CE, Miller D (2010) An updated checklist of scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. Galapagos Res 67:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincango M, Causton CE, Calderon Alvarez C, Jiménez-Uzcátegui G (2011) Evaluating the safety of Rodolia cardinalis to two species of Galapagos finch; Camarhynchus parvulus and Geospiza fuliginosa. Biol Control 56:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for Mixed Models, 6th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck RF, Shepard BM, Kenmore PE (1998) Experimental methods for evaluating arthropod natural enemies. Ann Rev Entomol 33:367–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch LD, Hokkanen HM, Babendreier D, Bigler F, Burgio G, Gao Z-H, Kuscke S, Loomans A, Menzler-Hokkanen I, Thomas MB, Tommasini G, Waage JK, van Lenteren JC, Zeng Q–Q (2001) Insect biological control and non-target effects: a European perspective. In: Wajnberg E, Scott JK, Quimby PC (eds) Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 99–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad YK (1989) The role of natural enemies in controlling Icerya purchasi in South Australia. Entomophaga 34:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad YK (1990) Discovery of isolated patches of lcerya purchasi by Rodolia cardinalis: a field study. Entomophaga 35:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad YK (1992) Observations on the seasonal abundance of Icerya purchasi on Acacia baileyana in Adelaide, South Australia. BioControl 37:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Roque-Albelo L (2003) Population decline of Galapagos endemic Lepidoptera on Volcan Alcedo (Isabela island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador): an effect of the introduction of the cottony cushion scale? Bull Inst R Sci Nat Belg Entomol 73:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Roque-Albelo L, Causton CE (1999) “El Niño” and introduced insects in the Galapagos Islands: different dispersal strategies, similar effects. Noticias de Galapagos 60:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1978) Ecological methods, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley JN, Julien MH (1998) The need for post-release studies to improve risk assessments and decision making in classical biological control. In: Zalucki M, Drew R, White G (eds) Pest management-future challenges: Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Applied Entomological Research Conference. The Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Pest Management, Australia, pp 561–564

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Bellows TS Jr (1996) Biological control. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Hoddle MS, Center T (2008) Control of pests and weeds by natural enemies: an introduction to biological control. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Carruthers RI, Center T, Hoddle MS, Hough-Goldstein J, Morin L, Smith L, Wagner D, Blossey B, Brancatini V, Casagrande R, Causton CE, Coetzee JA, Cuda J, Ding J, Fowler SV, Frank JH, Fuester R, Goolsby J, Grodowitz M, Heard TA, Hill MP, Hoffmann J, Huber J, Julien M, Kario MTK, Kenis M, Mason P, Medal J, Messing R, Miller R, Moore A, Neuenschwander P, Newman R, Norambuena H, Palmer WA, Pemberton R, Perez Panduro A, Pratt S, Rayamajhi M, Salom S, Sands D, Schooler S, Sheppard A, Shaw R, Schwarzländer M, Tipping PW, van Klinken R (2010) Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems: past achievements and current efforts. Biol Control 54(1):S2–S33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the GNPS park guards, V. Carrion, H. Herrera, N. d’Ozouville, G. Merlen, L. Roque-Albelo, N. Chasquilin, C. Sevilla, P. Lincango, J. Loayza, H. Rogg, T. Poulsom, F. Bersosa, R. Azuero, A. Mieles and C. Crespo for help with the survey work. We thank Sonia Cisneros (CDF) for all the logistical help, the Galápagos National Park Service for allowing insect sampling in the Park, Agrocalidad-SICGAL for transport and advice, and TAME for reduced airfares. CCA would also like to thank Alberto Ramirez, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia for invaluable input to her thesis. This publication is contribution number 2045 of the Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galapagos Islands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte E. Causton.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Kevin Heinz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calderón Alvarez, C., Causton, C.E., Hoddle, M.S. et al. Monitoring the effects of Rodolia cardinalis on Icerya purchasi populations on the Galapagos Islands. BioControl 57, 167–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9429-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9429-8

Keywords

Navigation