Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In field data to correctly characterize the seismic response of buildings and bridges

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of in-field acquired data to characterize the seismic response of building and bridges immediately after an earthquake, is discussed in this paper; in particular, we discuss how dynamical tests could help the assessment phase and could indicate if the structure is in condition to continue its regular use. In this perspective, two different case-studies will be discussed: the first is concerned with the interpretation of a particular behavior exhibited by a group of four buildings characterized, despite of the similarities among them, by strongly different seismic response (two of them collapsed and the other two survived with a medium damage level) and the second one is concerned with a campaign of dynamical tests finalized to a possible damage detection on a r.c. bridge. Concerning the first case study it is worth noticing how, during the 6 April earthquake in L’Aquila, two couples of similar (nearly twin) buildings belonging to the same urban intervention, exhibited a dramatically different response. In the two couples, the first couple constituted by two four-story buildings and the second couple by two three-stories buildings, one element collapsed suffering the well-known soft story mechanism, while the other one survived with a damage pattern not so strong, as expected considering the similarity with the collapsed one. The in situ measurements conducted in the framework of microzoning activities provided the opportunity of gathering useful information about the dynamical properties of the soil, thus evaluating possible site amplification effects. A key role was played in this case by a local amplification of the seismic intensity, due to the geology of the site. On the same time, dynamical tests on the survived buildings enlightened their dynamic characteristics and permitted the updating of the FE models used in the structural analysis. Linear and nonlinear models of the buildings have been developed, aiming to explain the different behavior. Even the use of simple linear models taking into account the contribution in stiffness of the infilled masonry walls permitted a coherent interpretation of observed phenomena. By using more accurate nonlinear finite elements models, it was possible to reconstruct the evolution of the seismic response and to obtain a more clear unfolding of the collapse mechanism. The key role of the infilled walls has been enlightened putting into evidence how a good construction of such non-structural elements could dramatically influence the global structural behaviour. Some laboratory tests on specimens of infill walls, extracted from the collapsed building, guided the selection of the mechanical parameters of the equivalent truss elements used in the models. With the second case-study we discuss a different, interesting and effective use of dynamical measures on damaged structures, when the same measures have been conducted in a not-damaged (or reference) condition. In this case, the dynamical tests could enlighten the stiffness reduction and can help to localize the occurred damage. With this purpose some test conducted in L’Aquila (Italy) after the 6 April 2009 earthquake on the r.c. Belvedere Bridge, will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armon D, Ben-Haim Y, Braun S (1994) Crack detection in beams by rank-ordering of eigenfrequency shifts. Mech Syst Signal Process 8:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzurro P, Mollaioli F, De Sortis A, Bruno S (2006) Effects of masonry walls on the seismic risk of reinforced concrete frame buildings. In: 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering, vol 6. pp 3319–3328

  • Boecherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordoni P, Di Giulio G, Haines AJ, Cara F, Milana G, Rovelli A (2010) Issues in choosing the references to use for spectral ratios from observations and modeling at Cavola Landslide in Northern Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1578–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brincker R, Ventura CE, Andersen P (2001) Damping estimation by frequency domain decomposition. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference—IMAC, vol 1. pp 698–703

  • Capecchi D, Vestroni F (2000) Monitoring of structural systems by using frequency data. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celebi M et al (2010) Recorded motions of the 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake and implications for building structural damage: overview. Earthq Spectra 26:651–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Clough DP, Clough RW (1973) Eartquake resistance of building with a “soft first storey”. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decanini L, De Sortis A, Goretti A, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F, Bazzurro P (2004a) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 2002, Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20:S221–S255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Mura A, Saragoni R (2004a). Seismic performance of masonry infilled R/C frames. In: Proceedings 13th WCEE, paper 165, Vancouver, 1–6 Aug

  • Decanini L, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F, De Sortis A (2005) Estimation of near-source ground motion and seismic behaviour of RC framed structures damaged by the 1999 Athens earthquake. J Earthq Eng 9(5):609–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilena M, Morassi A (2009) Structural health monitoring of rods based on natural frequency and antiresonant frequency measurements. Struct Health Monit 8(2):149–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilena M, Morassi A, Perin M (2011) Dynamic identification of a reinforced concrete damaged bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2990–3009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohler M, Mevel L, Hille F (2014) Subspace-based damage detection under changes in the ambient excitation statistics. Mech Syst Signal Process 45:207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolsek M, Fajfar P (2001) Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frames. J Earthq Eng 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell GML, Morassi A (1999) Estimating damage in a rod from changes in node positions. Inverse Probl Eng 7:215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima K, Aydan O, Aoki T, Kishimoto I, Konagai K, Matsui T, Sakuta J, Takahashi N, Teodori SP, Yashima A (2010) Reconnaissance investigation on the damage of the 2009 L’Aquila, Central Italy earthquake. J Earthq Eng 14:817–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):228–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989) Method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan) 30(1):25–33

  • Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib 145:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz SE, Diederich RP (1989) Seismic performance of buildings with weak first store. Earthq Spectra 5:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SESAME (2004) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations—measurements, processing and interpretations. SESAME European research project EVG1-CT-2000-00026, deliverable D23.12. http://sesame-fp5.obs.ujfgrenoble.fr

  • Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta AJ (1996) What is a reference site? Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6):1733–1748

    Google Scholar 

  • SVS 2010. ARTeMIS Extractor—MODAL 2014. http://www.svibs.com/

  • van Overschee P, De Moor BL (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation, applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab MMA, De Roeck G (1999) Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J Sound Vib 226:217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Group MS (2008) Indirizzi e criteri per la microzonazione sismica. Conferenza delle regioni e Provincie autonome—Dipartimento della protezione civile, Roma, vol 3. e Cd-rom (in Italian)

  • Working Group ITACA (2010) Data base of the Italian strong motion records. http://itaca.mi.ingv.it

  • Working Group MS_AQ (2010) La Microzonazione Sismica dell’area aquilana, vol 2. +1 DVD (in Italian)

  • Yan AM, Golinval JC (2006) Null subspace-based damage detection of structures using vibration measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:611–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Corps of Fire Brigade, in particular the Commander Di Gennaro, are kindly acknowledged for their invaluable help in making possible the ambient vibration measurements of the buildings. F. Cara, G. Cultrera, G. Di Giulio (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Sismologia e Tettonofisica, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Roma, Italia), R.M. Azzara (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Sismologico di Arezzo, Via Uguccione della Faggiuola 3, 52100 Arezzo, Italia), P. Bordoni P. (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Centro Nazionale Terremoti, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Roma, Italia), R. Cogliano, A. Fodarella, S. Pucillo, G. Riccio (6 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Centro per la Sismologia e l’Ingegneria sismica, 80035 Grottaminarda (AV), Italia) are kindly acknowledged for having performed the dynamic measurements of soil and buildings in Pettino.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Department, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi, 18, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy

    F. Benedettini

  2. Seismic and Volcanic Risks Office, Department of the Civil Protection, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Via Vitorchiano 2, 00189, Rome, Italy

    A. De Sortis

  3. Seismology and Tectonphysics Section, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143, Rome, Italy

    G. Milana

Authors
  1. F. Benedettini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. De Sortis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Milana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. De Sortis.

Additional information

Prof. Francesco Benedettini passed away on February 15, 2015, at the age of 59.

This paper is intended to be a testimonial of affection to a beloved colleague and friend. A.D. and G.M.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benedettini, F., De Sortis, A. & Milana, G. In field data to correctly characterize the seismic response of buildings and bridges. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 643–666 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9917-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9917-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation