Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seismic performance of three-storey full-scale sub-standard reinforced concrete buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two three-story full-scale sub-standard reinforced concrete buildings were tested under self-weight and reversed cyclic lateral displacements to examine their behavior during earthquakes. While one of these buildings was a part of an actual existing building (TB1) built in the beginning of 1990’s in Istanbul, the other was constructed by the authors as a representative building (TB2) that reflects the most common structural deficiencies of existing building stock in Turkey. Both buildings were constructed with plain bars, low strength concrete and inadequate lateral reinforcement. The differences between these buildings were axial load levels of first story columns, expected location of major structural damages (weak beam–strong column for TB1 and strong beam–weak column for TB2) and connection details of longitudinal bars in columns at the foundation–column interface (continuous for TB1 and lap-spliced with 180° hooks for TB2). Both buildings were pushed and pulled at increasing displacement amplitudes up to near collapse well beyond the life safety performance level. While TB1 was damaged significantly at 1.5 % inter-story drift ratio, TB2 reached near collapse damage at 4.0 % inter-story drift ratio. In this paper, details and test results of these two sub-standard buildings are presented. In addition, the available nonlinear modeling techniques and performance predictions of the Turkish Seismic Design Code (Specification for the buildings to be constructed in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, 2007), ASCE 41-13 (Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-13. ASCE, Reston, 2014) and Eurocode 8-3 (Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Bruxelles, 2005) are compared with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2014) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-13. ASCE, Reston, Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo A, Colombo A, Manfredi G, Negro P, Prota A (2005) Seismic behavior of a full scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates. Eng Struct 27(2005):769–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bournas DA, Negro P, Molina FJ (2013) Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: behavior of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms. Eng Struct 57(2013):609–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Doc. CEN/TC250/SC8/N388B. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Bruxelles

  • Computers and Structures Inc. (2011) 3D performance based design software. Perform 3D v5, California, USA

  • Della Corte G, Barecchia E, Mazzolani FM (2006) Seismic Upgrading of RC buildings by FRP: full scale tests of a real structure. J Mater Civ Eng 18:659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Ludovico M, Manfredi G, Mola E, Negro P, Prota A (2008) Seismic behavior of a full scale RC structure retrofitted using GFRP laminates. J Struct Eng 134:810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrocino G, Verderame GM, Manfredi G, Cosenza E (2004) Structural models of critical regions in old-type rc frames with smooth rebars. Eng Struct 26(14):2137–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fédération Internationale du Béton (FIB) (2012) Model Code 2010—final draft, vol 1, Bulletin 65, and vol 2, Bulletin 66, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Garcia R, Hajirasouliha I, Pilakoutas K (2010) Seismic behavior of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composites. Eng Struct 32(2010):3075–3085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Hajirasouliha I, Guadagnini M, Helal Y, Jemaa Y, Pilakoutas K, Mongabure P, Chrysostomou C, Kyriakides N, Ilki A, Budescu M, Taranu N, Ciupala MA, Torres L, Saiidi M (2014) Full-scale shaking table tests on a substandard RC building repaired and strengthened with Post-Tensioned Metal Straps. J Earthq Eng 18(2):187–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goksu C, Yilmaz H, Chowdhury SR, Orakcal K, Ilki A (2014) The effect of lap splice length on the cyclic lateral load behavior of RC members with low-strength concrete and plain bars. Adv Struct Eng 17(5):639–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goksu C, Inci P, Demir U, Yazgan U, Ilki A (2015) Field testing of substandard RC buildings through forced vibration tests. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9799-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao FP, Oktovianus Y, Ou YC, Luu CH, Hwang SJ (2015) A pushover seismic analysis and retrofitting method applied to low-rise RC school buildings. Adv Struct Eng 18(3):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SJ, Chiou TC, Hsiao FP, Chiou YJ, Alcocer SM (2008) Field test of RC school building retrofitted by post-tensioned rods. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17 October 2008

  • Kabeyasawa T, Kabeyasawa T, Hosokawa Y, Kim Y (2012) Static and dynamic loading test on base foundation in a reinforced concrete school building. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, 24–28 September 2012

  • Negro P, Mola E, Molina FJ, Magonette GE (2004) Full scale PSD testing of a torsionally unbalanced three-storey non-seismic RC frame In: Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1–6 August 2004

  • Negro P, Bournas DA, Molina FJ (2013) Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: global response. Eng Struct 57(2013):594–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol S, Fick D (2010) The test of a full-scale three-story RC structure with masonry infill walls. Eng Struct 32(2010):3112–3121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana-Gallo P, Pampanin S, Carr AJ (2010) Shake table tests of under-designed RC frames for the seismic retrofit of buildings-design and similitude requirements of the benchmark specimen. Paper presented at the 2010 NZSEE conference, Wellington, 26–28 March 2010

  • Turkish Seismic Design Code (2007) Specification for the buildings to be constructed in disaster areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Standards Institute (TSE) (1997) Design loads for buildings, TS 498. Turkish Standards Institute (TSE), Ankara

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Istanbul Development Agency (Project No: TR10/12/AFT/0050), ITU Scientific Research Fund Department. The contributions of Erkan Tore, Ozgun Ozeren, Alvand Moshfeghi, Soheil Khoshkholghi, Caglar Goksu, Pınar Inci, Ugur Demir, Ahmet Sahin and 2014 summer trainees are also gratefully acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to supports of Akcansa Co., Art-Yol Co., Boler Celik Co., Hilti-Turkey Co., Tasyapi Co., Urtim Co., and Kadikoy Municipality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Comert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Comert, M., Demir, C., Ates, A. et al. Seismic performance of three-storey full-scale sub-standard reinforced concrete buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 15, 3293–3320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0023-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0023-4

Keywords

Navigation