Skip to main content
Log in

Near real-time automatic moment magnitude estimation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe a stable automatic method to estimate in real time the seismic moment, moment magnitude and corner frequency of events recorded by a network comprising broad-band and accelerometer sensors. The procedure produces reliable results even for small-magnitude events \(\hbox {M}_{\mathrm{W}}\approx 3\). The real-time data arise from both the Transfrontier network at the Alps-Dinarides junction and from the Italian National Accelerometric Network (RAN). The data is pre-processed and the S-wave train identified through the application of an automatic method, which estimates the arrival times based on the hypocenter location, recording site and regional velocity model. The transverse component of motion is used to minimize conversion effects. The source spectrum is obtained by correcting the signals for geometrical spreading and intrinsic attenuation. Source spectra for both velocity and displacement are computed and, following Andrews (1986), the seismic moment and the first estimate of the corner frequency, \(f_{0}\), derived. The procedure is validated using the recordings of some recent moderate earthquakes (Carnia 2002; Bovec 2004; Parma 2008; Aquila 2009; Macerata 2009; Emilia 2012) and the recordings of some minor events in the SE Alps area for which independent seismic moment and moment magnitude estimates are available. The results obtained with a dataset of 843 events recorded by the Transfrontier and RAN networks show that the procedure is reliable and robust for events with \(\hbox {M}_{\mathrm{W}}\ge 3\). The estimates of \(f_{0}\) are less reliable. The results show a scatter, principally for small events with \(\hbox {M}_{\mathrm{W}}\le 3\), probably due to site effects and inaccurate locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1966) Generation and propagation of G waves from Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964, estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from G wave spectrum. Bull. Earthq. Rex Inst. Tokyo Uniu 44:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DJ (1986) Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size. Maurice Ewing series, 6, American Geophysical Union, Geophysics Monograph, 37, Washington DC, pp 259-267

  • Brune J (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75(26):4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune J (1971) Correction. J Geophys Res 76(20):5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro RR, Pacor F, Sala A, Petrungaro C (1996) S wave attenuation and site effects in the region of Friuli, Italy. J Geophys Res 101(B10):22355–22369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro RR, Pacor F, Puglia R, Ameri G, Letort J, Massa M, Luzi L (2013) The 2012 May 20 and 29, Emilia earthquakes (Northern Italy) and the main aftershocks: S-wave attenuation, acceleration source functions and site effects. J Geophys Res 195:597–611. doi:10.1093/gji/ggt245

    Google Scholar 

  • Console R, Rovelli A (1981) Attenuation parameters for Friuli region from strong-motion accelerogram spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):1981–1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa G, Moratto L, Suhadolc P (2010) The Friuli venezia giulia accelerometric network: RAF. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9157-y

  • Di Bona M, Rovelli A (1988) Effects of the bandwidth limitation on stress drops estimated from integrals of the ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(5):1818–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger DS (2003) TMDT_INV: time domain seismic moment tensor inversion. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, vol B. Academic Press, London, p 1627

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edward B, Allmann B, Fäh D, Clinton J (2010) Automatic computation of moment magnitudes for small earthquakes and the scaling of local to moment magnitude. J Geophys Res 183:407–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton JP (1992) Determination of amplitude and duration magnitudes and site residuals from short-period seismographs in northern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:533–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorini A, Nicoletti M, Marsan P, Bianconi R, De Nardis R, Filippi L, Marcucci S, Palma F, Zambonelli E (2010) The Italian strong motion network. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9141-6

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 32:163–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks C, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2981–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1983) Magnitude scale and quantification of earthquakes. Tectonophysics 93:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Jennings PC (1978) Determination of local magnitude, \(\text{ M }_{{\rm L}}\) from strong-motion accelerograms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(2):471–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancieri M, Zollo A (2008) A Bayesian approach to the real time estimation of magnitude from the early P and S wave displacement peaks. J Geophys Res 113:B12302. doi:10.1029/2007JB005386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagnini L, Akinci A, Herrmann RB, Pino NA, Scognamiglio L (2002) Characteristic of the ground motion in Northeastern Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2186–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagnini L, Hermann RB, Munafò I, Buttinelli M, Anselmi M, Akinci A, Boschi E (2012) The 2012 Ferrara seismic sequence: Regional crustal structure, earthquake sources, and seismic hazard. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19302. doi:10.1029/2012GL053214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeda K (1993) \(\text{ M }_{{\rm b}}\) (Lg Coda): A stable single station estimator of magnitude. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:851–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeda K, Hofstetter A, O’Boyle J, Walter WR (2003) Stable and transportable regional magnitudes based on coda-derived moment-rate spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:224–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayeda K, Walter WR (1996) Moment, energy, stressdrop, and source spectra of western United States earthquakes from regional coda envelopes. J Geophys Res 101(B5):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottemoller L, Havskov J (2003) Moment magnitude determination for local and regional earthquakes based on source spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pondrelli S, Salimbeni S, Perfetti P, Danecek P (2012) Quick regional moment tensor solutions for the Emilia 2012 (northern Italy) seismic sequence. Ann Geophys 55:4. doi:10.4401/ag-6146

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF (1935) An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bull Seismol Soc Am 25:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraò A, Peruzza L (2012) Fault-plane solutions from moment-tensor inversion and preliminary Coulomb stress analysis for the Emilia Plain. Ann Geophys 55:4. doi:10.4401/ag-6134

    Google Scholar 

  • Scognamiglio L, Margheriti L, Tinti E, Bono A, De Gori P, Lauciani V, Lucente FP, Mandiello AG, Marcocci C, Mazza S, Pintore S, Quintiliani M (2012) The 2012 Pianura Padana Emiliana seismic sequence: locations, moment tensors and magnitudes. Ann Geophys 55:4. doi:10.4401/ag-6159

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambonelli E, De Nardis R, Filippi L, Nicoletti M, Dolce M (2011) Performance of the Italian strong motion network during the 2099, L’Aquila seismic sequence (central Italy). Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Italian Civil Defense (DPC) for kindly providing us part of the seismic data used in this research. Part of his work was financially supported by the S.H.A.R.M. Project of the Area Science Park of Trieste: “Tomografia crostale per la valutazione e mitigazione del rischio sismico”. This study was partially supported also by Project S1 of the Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) (2012-2013): “Miglioramento delle conoscenze per la definizione del potenziale sismogenetico”. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that have contributed to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Gallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallo, A., Costa, G. & Suhadolc, P. Near real-time automatic moment magnitude estimation. Bull Earthquake Eng 12, 185–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9565-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9565-x

Keywords

Navigation