Abstract
In this paper the seismic response of inelastic structures with unilateral contact is revisited with dimensional analysis. All physically realizable contact types are captured via a non-smooth complementarity approach. The implementation of formal dimensional analysis leads to a condensed presentation of the response and unveils remarkable order even though two different types of non-linearity coexist in the response: the boundary non-linearity of unilateral contact and the inelastic behaviour of the structure itself. It is shown that regardless the intensity and frequency content of the excitation, all response spectra become self-similar when expressed in the appropriate dimensionless terms. The proposed approach hinges upon the notion of the energetic length scale of an excitation which measures the persistence of ground shaking to impose deformation demands. Using the concept of persistency which is defined for excitations with or without distinct pulses, the response is scaled via meaningful novel intensity measures: the dimensionless gap and the dimensionless yield displacement. The study confirms that contact may have a different effect on the response displacements of inelastic structures depending on the spectral region. In adjacent inelastic structures, such as colliding buildings or interacting bridge segments, contact is likely to alter drastically the excitation frequencies’ at which the system is most vulnerable. Finally, it is shown that the proposed approach yields maximum response displacements which correlate very well with the persistency of real earthquakes for a bridge system with considerably complex behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DA:
-
Dimensional Analysis
- LCP:
-
Linear Complementarity Problem
- MSSS:
-
Multi-Span Simply-Supported
- PGA:
-
Peak Ground Acceleration
- SDOF:
-
Single Degree Of Freedom
References
Barenblatt G (1996) Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
DesRoches R, Muthukumar S (2002) Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multiple-frame bridges. J Struct Eng 128(7): 860
Dicleli M (2008) Performance of seismic-isolated bridges with and without elastic-gap devices in near-fault zones. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(6): 935–954
Dimitrakopoulos EG (2010) Analysis of a frictional oblique impact observed in Skew bridges. Nonlinear Dyn 60: 575–595
Dimitrakopoulos EG, Kappos AJ, Makris N (2009a) Dimensional analysis of yielding and pounding structures for records without distinct pulses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(7): 1170–1180
Dimitrakopoulos EG, Makris N, Kappos AJ (2009b) Dimensional analysis of the earthquake-induced pounding between adjacent structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(7): 867–886
Dimitrakopoulos EG, Makris N, Kappos AJ (2010) Dimensional analysis of the earthquake response of a pounding oscillator. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 136(3): 299–310
Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y (1998) Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27(5): 487–502
Leine RI, Van Campen DH, Glocker CH (2003) Nonlinear dynamics and modeling of various wooden toys with impact and friction. J Vib Control 9(1–2): 25–78
Makris N, Chang S (2000) Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(1): 85–107
Makris N, Black CJ (2004a) Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elastoplastic structures under pulse-type excitations. J Eng Mech 130(9): 1006
Makris N, Black CJ (2004b) Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations. J Eng Mech 130(9): 1019
Makris N, Psychogios T (2006) Dimensional response analysis of yielding structures with first-mode dominated response. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(10): 1203–1224
Malhotra PK (1998) Dynamics of seismic pounding at expansion joints of concrete bridges. J Eng Mech 124(7): 794
Malhotra PK, Huang MJ, Shakal AF (1995) Seismic interaction at separation joints of an instrumented concrete bridge. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24(8): 1055–1067
Rathje EM, Abrahamson NA, Bray JD (1998) Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(2): 150
Ruangrassamee A, Kawashima K (2001) Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(10): 1511–1538
Saadeghvaziri M, Yazdanimotlagh A (2008) Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges. Eng Struct 30(1): 54–66
Saadeghvaziri M, Yazdani-Motlagh AR, Rashidi S (2000) Effects of soil–structure interaction on longitudinal seismic response of MSSS bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20(1–4): 231–242
Sedov L (1992) Similarity and dimensional methods in mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton Fla
Vega J, del Rey I, Alarcon E (2009) Pounding force assessment in performance-based design of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(13): 1525–1544
Wen Y (1975) Approximate method for nonlinear random vibration 102(EM4): 389–401
Wen Y (1976) Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems 102(EM2): 249–263
Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C (2002) Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(6): 1325–1345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dimitrakopoulos, E.G., Makris, N. & Kappos, A.J. Dimensional analysis of the earthquake-induced pounding between inelastic structures. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 561–579 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9220-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9220-8