Abstract
Robots have been used to model nature, while nature in turn can contribute to the real-world artifacts we construct. One particular domain of interest is chemical search where a number of efforts are underway to construct mobile chemical search and localization systems. We report on a project that aims at constructing such a system based on our understanding of the pheromone communication system of the moth. Based on an overview of the peripheral processing of chemical cues by the moth and its role in the organization of behavior we emphasize the multimodal aspects of chemical search, i.e. optomotor anemotactic chemical search. We present a model of this behavior that we test in combination with a novel thin metal oxide sensor and custom build mobile robots. We show that the sensor is able to detect the odor cue, ethanol, under varying flow conditions. Subsequently we show that the standard model of insect chemical search, consisting of a surge and cast phases, provides for robust search and localization performance. The same holds when it is augmented with an optomotor collision avoidance model based on the Lobula Giant Movement Detector (LGMD) neuron of the locust. We compare our results to others who have used the moth as inspiration for the construction of odor robots.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ache, B.W. 1994. Towards a common strategy for transducing olfactory information. Semin. Cell Biol., 5(1):55–63.
Araneda, R.C., Kini, A.D., and Firestein, S. 2000. The molecular receptive range of an odorant receptor. Nat. Neurosci., 3(12):1248–1255.
Arkin, R.C. 1998. Behavior-Based Robotics. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Baker, T.C. 1990. Upwind flight and casting flight: Complimentary phasic and tonic systems used for location of a sex pheromone sources by male moths. In Proc. of the 10th International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste, Oslo, Norway, pp. 18–25.
Baker, T.C. and Kuenen, L.P.S. 1982. Pheromone source location by flying moths: A supplementary non-anemotactic mechanism. Science, 216:424–427.
Balkovsky, E. and Shraiman, B.I. 2002. Olfactory search at high Reynolds number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99(20):12589–12593.
Batchelor, G.K. 1990. Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech., 5:113–133.
Bau, J., Justus, K.A., and Carde, R.T. 2002. Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. J. Insect. Physiol., 48(4):433–442.
Bermúdez i Badia, S., Pyk, P., and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 2005. A Biologically Inspired Flight Control System for a Blimp-based UAV. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2005), Barcelona, Spain.
Bermúdez i Badia, S. and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 2004. A Collision Avoidance Model Based on the Lobula Giant Movement Detector of the Locust. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2004 (IJCNN’04), Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1757.
Bernardet, U., Blanchard, M.J., and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 2002. IQR: A distributed system for real-time real-world neuronal simulation. Neurocomputing, 44–46:1043–1048.
Blanchard, M.J., Rind, C., and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 2001. How accurate need sensory coding be for behavior? Experiments using a mobile robot. Neurocomputing, 38–40:1113–1119.
Blanchard, M.J. and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 1999. Using a mobile robot to study locust collision avoidance responses. International Journal of Neural Systems, 9:405–410.
Brooks, R.A.A. 1986. Robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2:14–23.
Buck, L. and Axel, R. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 65(1):175–187.
Cardé, R.T. and Hagaman, T.E. 1979. Behavioral responses of the gypsy moth in a wind tunnel to air-borne enantiomers of disparlure. Environ. Entomol., 8:475–484.
Charlton, R.E. and Cardé, R.T. 1990. Orientation of male gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar (L.), to pheromone sources: The role of olfactory and visual cues. J. Insect Behav., 3:443–469.
Duckett, T., Axelsson, M., and Saffiotti, A. 2001. Learning to Locate an Odor Source with a Mobile Robot. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2001), Seoul, South Korea, pp. 4017–4022.
Egelhaaf, M. and Borst, A. 1993. Motion computation and visual orientation in flies. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Comp. Physiol., 104(4):659–673.
Firestein, S. 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature, 413(6852):211–218.
Gabbiani, F., Krapp, H.G., Koch, C., and Laurent, G. 2002. Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature, 420(6913):320–324.
Hatsopoulos, N., Gabbiani, F., and Laurent, G. 1995. Elementary computation of object approach by wide-field visual neuron. Science, 270(5238):1000–1003.
Haynes, K.F., Baker, T.C., Willis, M.A., and Phelan, P.L. 1985. A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths. Physiol. Entomol., 10:257–265.
Hildebrand, J.G. and Shepherd, G.M. 1997. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: Converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 20:595–631.
Ishida, H., Nakamoto, T., Moriizumi, T., Kikas, T., and Janata, J. 2001. Plume-tracking robots: A new application of chemical sensors. Biol. Bull., 200(2):222–226.
Ishida, H., Nakayama, G., Nakamoto, T., and Moriizumi, T. 2002. Controlling a gas/odor plume-tracking robot based on transient responses of gas sensors. In Proc. of the First IEEE Int. Conf. on Sensors (IEEE Sensors 2002), Orlando, USA, pp. 1665–1670.
Kennedy, J.S. and Marsh, D. 1974. Pheromone-regulated anemotaxis in flying moths. Science, 184(140):999–1001.
Kennedy, J.S., Marsh, D.M., and Ludlow, A.R. 1978. Anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone. Physiological Entomology, 3:221–240.
Kolmogorov, A.N. 1941. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk Arm. SSR, 30:301–305.
Kuenen, L.P.S. and Baker, T.C. 1983. A non-anemotactic mechanism used in pheromone source location by flying moths. Physiological Entomology, 8:277–289.
Kuwana, Y., Nagasawa, S., Shimoyama, I., and Kanzaki, R. 1999. Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behavior of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors. Biosensors Bioelectronics, 14:195–202.
Lilienthal, A., Reimann, D., and Zell, A. 2003. Gas source tracing with a Mobile Robot using an adapted moth strategy. In Proc. of the AMS 2003, 18. Fachgespräch, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 150–160.
Ludlow, A., Perry, J., David, C., Kennedy, J., and Wall, C. 1982. A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant source of wild-borne odor. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 8:1207–1215.
Ludlow, A.R., Kennedy, J.S., and Sanders, C.J. 1981. Guidance of flying male moths by wind-borne sex pheromone. Physiol. Entomol., 6:395–412.
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T., and Buck, L.B. 1999. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell, 96(5):713–723.
Mombaerts, P. 1999. Seven-transmembrane proteins as odorant and chemosensory receptors. Science, 286(5440):707–711.
Mombaerts, P. 2004. Odorant receptor gene choice in olfactory sensory neurons: The one receptor-one neuron hypothesis revisited. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 14(1):31–36.
Murlis, J. 1986. The structure of odor plumes. In T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.), Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 27–38.
Murlis, J., Elkinton, J.S., and Carde, R.T. 1992. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 37:505–532.
Murlis, J., Willis, M.A., and Carde, R.T. 2000. Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests. Physiol. Entomol., 25:211–222.
Pearce, T.C., Chonga, K.Y., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Bermúdez i Badia, S., Carlsson, M.A., Chanie, E., and Hansson, B.S. 2004. Chemotactic search in complex environments: From insects to real-world applications. In J.W. Gardner and J. Yinon (eds.), Electronic Noses & Sensors For The Detection Of Explosives: NATO Science Series, Kluwer Academic Pub, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp. 181–207.
Pelosi, P. 1994. Odorant-binding proteins. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 29(3):199–228.
Qian, L. and Cowen, E.A. 2002. The information content of a scalar plume—A plume tracing perspective. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2:9–34.
Reichhardt, W. 1961. Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In W.A. Rosenblith (ed.), Sensory Communication Contributions to the Symposium on Principles of Sensory Communication, July 19–August 1, 1959, Endicott House, M.I.T: Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, Mass., pp. 303–317.
Rind, F.C. and Simmons, P.J. 1992. Orthopteran DCMD neuron: A reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. J. Neurophysiol, 68(5):1654–1666.
Russell, R.A. 1999. Odor Detection by Mobile Robots. World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore.
Rutkowski, A.J., Edwards, S., Willis, M.A., Quinn, R.D., and Causey, G.C. 2004. A robotic platform for testing moth-inspired plume tracking strategies. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2004), New Orleans, USA.
Schlotterer, G.R. 1977. Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli. Can. J. Zool., 55:1372–1376.
Shraiman, B.I. and Siggia, E.D. 2000. Scalar turbulence. Nature, 405(6787):639–646.
Turin, L. and Yoshii, F. 2002. Structure-odor relations: A modern perspective. In R. Doty (ed.), Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp. 275–294.
Vickers, N.J. and Baker, T.C. 1994. Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91(13):5756–5760.
Vickers, N.J., Christensen, T.A., Baker, T.C., and Hildebrand, J.G. 2001. Odor-plume dynamics influence the brain’s olfactory code. Nature, 410(6827):466–470.
Webster, D.R. and Weissburg, M.J. 2001. Chemosensory guidance cues in a turbulent chemical odor plume. Limnol. Oceanogr., 46:1034–1047.
Willis, M.A. and Baker, T.C. 1984. Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behavior of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta. Physiological Entomology, 9:341–358.
Zhang, X. and Firestein, S. 2002. The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse. Nat. Neurosci., 5(2):124–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Pawel Pyk received his M.S. in Electrical Engineering (1991), M.S. in Computer Science (1994) and Ph.D. in Automatic Control and Robotics (1998), all from Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. With his background in electronics, computer science, control engineering, system dynamics and robotics he was involved in challenging interdisciplinary research projects applied to medicine, biology, and psychology. Since 1992, he conducted his research in biomedical technology at the AO Research Institute (Davos, Switzerland). Currently he is working at the Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich/Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH, Zurich, Switzerland) on biologically inspired robotics (robotics with particular focus on olfaction, chemosensory UAV and sensor integration), and on the physiological telemetry.
Sergi Bermúdez i Badia is a Ph.D. student at the Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich/ETH, Zurich, Switzerland since 2003. He received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Telecommunications Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Barcelona, in 2003. His research interests include autonomous navigation, computational neuroscience and biologically-based modeling.
Ulysses Bernardet is a PhD student at the Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich/Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ), Switzerland. He received his M.S. in psychology, 1999, from the University of Zurich. His research interests include neural simulation, autonomous navigation and design of novel robotics platform.
Philipp Knüsel studied physics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ), Switzerland. Since 2002, he is a PhD student with Paul Verschure at the Institute of Neuroinformatics at ETHZ. His main research interests are the neuronal coding and processing of sensory information, with special emphasis on the olfactory system of insects.
Mikael A Carlsson got basic biological training at Lund University with focus on sensory biology. He initiated his Ph.D studies in 1999 and mainly worked with neuroimaging in the moth olfactory system. After defending his thesis in 2003 at SLU he continued his work on moth olfactory processing within the AMOTH project. Since 2006 he has a post doc position at AstraZeneca in Södertälje.
Jing Gu is a PhD Student in Engineering Department at the University of Leicester, UK. She received her Bachelors in Computer Science and Technology from Nanjing University, China. Her research interests include biologically inspired robotics, neuronal modeling, artificial intelligence, and machine learning.
Eric Chanie is director of Research & development of ALPHA MOS company, specialized in Smart Sensing Systems. He brings 12 years of expertise in Development & Design of multi-sensor array technologies including sample preparation, selection and design of appropriate sensing technologies, software development, data processing techniques and artificial intelligence.
He received an engineer diploma (1993) from ENSEIRB (National Superior school of Electronic and Radiocommunication in Bordeaux, France) as well as an MBA degree (1994).
He was involved in coordination of European Research and Development projects related to artificial olfaction and is a member of the scientific council of European Network of Excellence GOSPEL (General Olfaction and sensing Projects on a European Level). He holds several patents in this field.
Bill S. Hansson is Director at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany. He received his BSc and PhD in Ecology at Lund University, Sweden. After graduating he spent a postdoc period at ARLDN, University of Arizona. In 2000 he became Professor in Lund, and in 2001 he was recruited as professor and head of division to the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) at Alnarp, Sweden. In 2006 he was recruited as Director of the Department of Evolutionoary Neuroethology, MPI, Jena. His research centers on the neural mechanisms underlying olfactory-driven behavior in insects, and how these systems have evolved. Systems studied include moth communication, fruit fly olfaction and giant crab olfactory evolution. He has published 125 scientific articles, several in leading scientific journals including Nature, Science, Current Biology and PNAS.
Tim C. Pearce currently holds a Lectureship in Bioengineering at Leicester University where he runs NeuroLab http://www.neurolab.le.ac.uk/ which focuses on research on computational models of olfactory information processing and their application to machine olfaction. He holds a first degree in Electronic Engineering (Honours) awarded by Warwick University and received a PhD. from the same institution in 1997. He has since held the position of Visiting Research Assistant Professor at the Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, USA were he worked on a DARPA supported research programme to translate principles of information processing in the biological olfactory pathway over to practical to instrumentation for chemical sensing. He currently serves as an Editorial Board member of the Journal of Neural Engineering and has been invited to teach at the Advanced European Summer School in Computational Neuroscience, Obidos, Portugal, at the 1st European School of Neuroengineering, Venice, Italy and at the Neuromorphic Engineering Workshop, Telluride, Colorado, USA on numerous occasions. He was recently elected a Fellow of the Institute of Physics and is a Junior Member of the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.
Paul F.M.J. Verschure (1962) is an ICREA research professor at the Technology Department and Foundation Barcelona Media of University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. He received both his Ma. and PhD in psychology. His scientific aim is to find a unified theory of mind, brain and body through the use of synthetic methods and to apply such a theory to the development of novel cognitive technologies. He has pursued his research at different institutes in the US (Neurosciences Institute and The Salk Institute, both in San Diego) and Europe (University of Amsterdam, University of Zurich and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-ETH—where he was a founding senior member of the Institute of Neuroinformatics – and University Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona). He works on biologically constrained models of perception, learning, behavior and cognition that are applied to wheeled and flying robots, interactive spaces and avatars. He has published in leading scientific journals including Nature, Science, PLoS and PNAS. Since 1998, Verschure has generated, together with his collaborators, a series of 17 public exhibits of which the most ambitious was the project “Ada: Intelligent space” for the Swiss national exhibition Expo.02, that was visited by 560000 people.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyk, P., Bermúdez i Badia, S., Bernardet, U. et al. An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search. Auton Robot 20, 197–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-7101-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-006-7101-4