Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial Effect as a Consequence of a Mismatch between the Detector Signal and the Averaged Neutron Flux Density

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The transient processes induced in a water-moderated and -cooled reactor by prolonged (several seconds) insertion of absorbing rods into the reactor are analyzed using experimental and computational data. The change in the neutron flux density in core regions, forming the detector signal, during the motion of the rods, and the subsequent change in the distribution of delayed-neutron sources are examined. The spatial effect of the reactivity is determined from the coefficient of nonuniformity of the neutron flux density. The conditions under which regression analysis can be used to determine the efficiency of the rods are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. A. Kazanskii, I. P. Matvienko, P. L. Tyutyunnikov, and L. D. Shokodko, “On taking account of the reactivity effects in measurements of the reactivity by the method of the inverse solution of the kinetic equations,” At. Énerg., 51, No. 6, 387–389 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Kaminskii and I. D. Krylov, Characteristics and Methods of Taking Account of the Spatial Kinetics in Reactivity Measurements, Preprint IAE-3884/4 (1984).

  3. Yu. A. Kazanskii and E. S. Matusevich, Experimental Methods of Reactor Physics, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Chao, D. Chapman, D. Hill, and L. Grobmyer, “Dynamic rod worth measurement,” Nucl. Technol., 132, 403–412 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Tereshenok and V. P. Povarov, “Effect of the position of the ionization chambers relative to individual control rods in VVER-1000 on the indications of reactivity measurement devices,” Teploenergetika, No. 5, 22–25 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. V. Tsyganov and L. K. Shishkov, “Measurement of the effectiveness of VVER control rods,” At. Énerg., 96, No. 3, 183–188 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. S. Bobrov, G. V. Lebedev, and Yu. A. Nechaev, “Measurements of the effectiveness of control rods by the modernized inverse kinetics method,” Vopr. At. Nauki Tekhn. Ser. Fiz. Yad. Reakt., No. 3, 48–56 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. L. Hetrick, Dynamics of Nuclear Reactors [Russian translation], Atomizdat, Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. A. Kuznetsov (ed.), Ship Nuclear Power Plants, Atomizdat, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Ya. Emelyanov, V. I. Mikhan, V. I. Solonin, et al., Nuclear Reactor Design, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1982).

  11. SAPFIR_VVR95&RC with the BNAB-78/S-95 Constants Library (neutron-physical calculation of propulsion reactors in the burnup process), Certificate No. 87, Dec. 18, 1997, Moscow (1997).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 8–12, January, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinogorov, N.A. Spatial Effect as a Consequence of a Mismatch between the Detector Signal and the Averaged Neutron Flux Density. At Energy 114, 8–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-013-9662-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-013-9662-6

Keywords

Navigation