Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on Roderic A. Girle’s “Proof and Dialogue in Aristotle”

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 15 October 2015

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Corcoran, “Completeness of an Ancient Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 37 (1972): 696–702; J. Corcoran, “Aristotelian Syllogisms: Valid Arguments or True Universalized Conditionals?” Mind, 83 (1974): 279–281; and T.J. Smiley, “What is a Syllogism?” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2 (1973): 136–154.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liberal Studies Program, New York University, 726 Broadway, Room 646, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Michael Shenefelt

  2. Liberal Studies Program, New York University, 726 Broadway, Room 619, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Heidi White

Authors
  1. Michael Shenefelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Shenefelt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shenefelt, M., White, H. Comment on Roderic A. Girle’s “Proof and Dialogue in Aristotle”. Argumentation 30, 465–466 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9390-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9390-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation