Abstract
The study encompasses three reproduction seasons. Tench spawners caught during the spawning season originated from carp ponds (domestic stock) and a lake (wild stock). Fish were reproduced under controlled conditions after hormonal stimulation with GnRHa-containing pellets combined with metoclopramide (Ovopel) or carp pituitary homogenate (CPH). As a result of hormonal stimulation, eggs were obtained from a larger number of females originating from the lake (71.7%) than those originating from the pond (58.3%), although no other statistical differences were found. A similar relationship was recorded for the spermatozoa motilities (range from 72 to 76%). The obtained results indicate that both investigated reservoirs are suitable for tench broodstock management due to the fact that synchronization of ovulation among different stocks is easy to achieve. For this purpose, among the tested spawning agents, Ovopel could be recommended as being slightly more effective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cyprinid aquaculture is focused mainly on carps such as common Cyprinus carpio (L.), crucian Carassius carassius (L.), bighead Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson) or grass Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes). Effective production of these species has become possible mainly by the artificial reproduction under controlled conditions (Horvath et al. 1997; Brzuska 2005; Kucharczyk et al. 2008). Properly developed techniques of propagation and controlled rearing have allowed rationalization of commercial production. Simultaneously, in recent years interest in common tench, Tinca tinca (L.), culturing has increased significantly (Gela et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006). This fish species has been recently treated as the most promising species in freshwater aquaculture. Common tench has been reared for many years as a supplementary fish species in carp ponds, causing better use of forage and, as a consequence, better productivity per unit of area (Regadera 1995; Steffens 1995).
Tench production has been focused on two main aspects: production of commercial fish in fish farms and production of material for restocking natural waters. The market demand for tench stocking material is increasing from year to year (Mamcarz and Skrzypczak 2006; Skrzypczak and Mamcarz 2006). On the other hand, older stocking material is often recommended for the stocking of lakes where, despite appropriate nutritional conditions, there are no natural spawning grounds to ensure an appropriate level of reproduction of that species. There is much published data available concerning the artificial reproduction of common tench under controlled conditions, but it mainly describes the reproduction of cultured stocks (e.g. Kouril et al. 1986; Linhart and Billard 1995; Gela et al. 2003; Rodina et al. 2004; Mamcarz et al. 2006). It could be caused by many difficulties with capturing the fish from natural reservoirs. Among others, it is necessary to provide a proper method of catching, which has a major and direct impact on the spawners’ condition. Another important aspect in the reproduction of cyprinids under controlled conditions is the right (not too early (Krejszeff et al. 2008) or not too late (Targońska et al. 2010)) time of catching because the moment of carrying out the controlled reproduction procedures can be a major case of spawning failure. It is very often caused by unfavorable thermal conditions, which could be found in both ponds and open waters (Targońska et al. 2010). The sustainable culture procedures could become dependent on natural populations due to proper gene management (Harada et al. 1998; Vrijenhoek 1998). However, synchronization of ovulation of wild and cultured stocks is difficult (Kucharczyk et al. 1997b, c, 2005; Krejszeff et al. 2009). Therefore, investigations regarding this aspect could have an important effect on practical implementations. Support with hormonal injections of carp or tench pituitary homogenates (Gela et al. 2006; Kucharczyk et al. 2007) as well as analogs of GnRH (Linhart et al. 1995; Linhart and Billard 1995; Kouřil 1998; Kujawa et al. 2009) plays the dominating role in artificial tench reproduction. Successful reproduction of wild stocks of tench under controlled conditions is determined first of all by the stage of maturity of spawners and, which is linked to it, the time and place of obtaining them from natural waters. But there is lack of studies comparing between the artificial reproduction of wild and cultured tench spawners under controlled conditions. For this purpose, long-term studies aiming at checking the influence of spawners’ origin and stimulators used on the effects of tench reproduction under controlled conditions are required.
Materials and methods
Spawners’ origin and manipulations
Tench spawners were obtained during three consecutive spawning seasons (in mid-June) from Lake Maróz, a mesotrophic lake with a total area of 332 ha, maximal depth of 41 m and average depth of 11.9 m) and from earthen ponds (total area 2.5 ha, average depth 1.5 m), both located in northern Poland. The fish were collected during their natural spawning season. The fish from the lake and the pond were obtained using commercial fishing traps when the water temperature reached 19°C. The spawners were transported to the hatchery of the Department of Lake and River Fisheries in Olsztyn in plastic bags with oxygen and anesthetic medium (2-phenoxyethanol at dose 0.15 cm3 dm−3). In total, 180 selected individuals (120 females and 60 males) with an average weight of 0.3–1.4 kg were obtained during 3 years. For each year, 20 females (weights ranging from 0.61 to 0.93 kg) and 10 males (weights ranging from 0.43 to 0.56 kg) were selected from both locations. The mean weights of the fish originating from the lake and the pond did not differ statistically (t-test, P < 0.05). The research was conducted during the three following seasons.
After transport, the fish were treated with a preventive bath in a solution of NaCl (0.5%) and were then placed in tanks of 1,000 dm3 capacity with aeration and thermal control (Kujawa et al. 1999). The maximum load of spawners was 25 kg m−3. The dissolved oxygen level ranged between 6.0 and 8.4 ppm. The photoperiod was 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness per day (16L:8D). The fish were acclimated for 2 days at a water temperature of 22°C. The oocytes samples (minimum 50–70 oocytes in each sample) from females were collected in vivo with a catheter shortly before first injection. Sampled oocytes were placed in Serra’s solution for clarification of the cytoplasm (prepared with 70% ethanol, 40% formaldehyde and acetic acid in proportions of 6:3:1, respectively). After 5 min, the position of the oocyte nucleus was determined using a 4-stage scale. The oocyte samples (n = 40) were photographed using a stereoscopic microscope (Leica MZ 12.5, Germany). The oocyte diameter measurements were taken, and the percentages of different oocyte sizes were calculated. All measurements (±0.01 mm) were taken using ProgRes® Capture Pro 2.5 (Jenoptik, Germany) software.
Hormonal stimulation and spawning procedure
After acclimation, the fish were randomly divided (among stocks) into two groups for which different hormonal stimulation was provided. The first group was treated with Ovopel (mammalian GnRH analog [D-Ala6, Pro9Net-mGnRH] with metoclopramide—dopamine antagonist) and the second one with CPH (carp pituitary homogenate). The first injection of Ovopel was given with 0.1 and the second with 1 pellet kg−1 of spawner’s bodyweight. In case of carp pituitary, CPH injections at 0.4 and 3.6 mg kg−1 of spawner bodyweight were administered. The males (in groups and stock) were treated with the same doses of hormonal preparations as the females. The time between injections was 12 h. The injections were administered intraperitoneally under the ventral fin. After the resolving injection, the temperature of water was increased from 22 to 24°C. The fish were checked 9 h after the resolving injection and then every 2 h. During all manipulations, the fish were anaesthetized with 2-phenoxyethanol at 0.5 ml dm3 of water. The same stimulation schedule and remaining procedure were applied during each year of the experiment. During this procedure, latency time and the number of ovulated females were recorded.
Gamete management
Eggs were obtained, placed into dry plastic vessels and fertilized with pooled semen obtained from a minimum of 6 males from the same stock as females. Sperm was collected in the plastic syringes calibrated at 0.1 cm3. Only those sperm that showed a motility of more than 80% of spermatozoa was used for egg fertilization. The sperm motility was assessed subjectively under a light microscope (500×) in a 0.5% NaCl solution (Glogowski et al. 1997). Two egg samples (250–300 eggs each) from each female were mixed with 0.05 ml of pooled milt sample. The eggs were incubated at 24°C on a Petri dish at a water temperature of 24°C, which was found to be optimal for tench embryonic development (Kokurewicz 1970). The survival of embryos at the eyed-egg-stage (2nd day of incubation) was assessed.
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences between groups regarding ovulation rate and embryos survival were analyzed using a t-test (P < 0.05). Regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between latency time and percentage of ovulation.
Results
Oocytes taken from females before applying hormonal induction were different both in size and developmental stages. The oocytes were classified into 3 groups, i.e. small, medium and large. The diameter intervals of each group were 0.18–0.22, 0.48–0.57, and 0.95–1.01 mm, respectively. But in all females, minimum 15% of oocytes were “large” size. There was no relationship between the percentage of the largest oocyte diameter and female ovulation and percentage of obtained egg weight. The mass of eggs was between 4.2 and 15.6% of female BW. There were no differences between tench populations or yearly fluctuations (Table 1).
Better effects expressed by percentage of ovulation were obtained in both stocks by the application of Ovopel (average 72%) than CPH (average 58%). In all cases, the percentage of ovulation was higher in the wild stock than in the cultured one (Table 2). It is noteworthy that the results obtained in the second year of the study were the worst regardless of fish origin. No differences were found (t-test, P > 0.05) among populations or hormonal treatments.
It was found that the origin of the females had no influence on synchronization of ovulation. The females after application of CPH ovulated earlier (14.0 + 3.2 h) than after Ovopel (16.7 + 2.9 h) (Fig. 1). The ovulation peak of females stimulated by CPH appeared 12 h after the resolving injection, whereas in groups stimulated by Ovopel, it was 15 h. Generally, there were no differences in the latency time between wild (15.7 + 3.2 h) and cultured fish (15.2 + 3.5 h) (Fig. 2). About 80% of females ovulated between 12 and 18 h after the resolving injection.
There was no influence of fish origin or applied hormonal treatment on embryo survival (t-test, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3). In each season, there were no differences in this parameter, although during season II, the recorded value was lower than in other seasons.
There were no differences in spermiation percentages between wild and cultured stock or between different hormonal stimulations. The spermatozoa motility was similar and ranged between 72 and 76%.
Discussion
Artificial reproduction of cyprinids is possible mainly after hormonal stimulation (Kucharczyk et al. 1997a, 2005; Brzuska 2005; Szabo et al. 2002; Linhart et al. 2006; Krejszeff et al. 2008, 2009; Podhorec and Kouril 2009; Yaron et al. 2009; Żarski et al. 2009). The application of different spawning agents and doses resulted in different ovulation rates and gametes’ quality (Glogowski et al. 1997, 1999; Babiak et al. 1998; Kucharczyk et al. 2005, 2007; Cejko et al. 2010), which was usually caused by different interactions on the fish organism. The largest differences were noted when fish from different stocks were reproduced (Krejszeff et al. 2009) as well as different spawn forms of one species (Krejszeff et al. 2010), while multi-batch spawners are much more difficult to reproduce (Kucharczyk et al. 1997c). Tench has reproduction periods 2–3 times during the season, on average (Horoszewicz 1983; Alas and Solak 2004; Benzer et al. 2007), and this performance of tench spawning is the cause of numerous difficulties in obtaining gametes under controlled conditions, where one of the most important aspects is the time of hormonal injection after fish collection (Kucharczyk et al. 2007).
The studied fish originated from different environments with different thermal characteristics during the year. During the winter, the water temperature in ponds is usually lower than in the lake. Additionally, faster warming of water is usually observed in the ponds during the spring and summer. Rapid and frequent changes in water temperature during spring and summer under natural conditions may influence the number of spawning portions during the spawning season (Horoszewicz 1981, 1983; Alas and Solak 2004; Benzer et al. 2007). The thermal regime during winter and the rate of thermal gradation during the pre-spawning period also have a strong effect on gametogenesis (Horoszewicz 1981; Linhart et al. 2006). During this study, the spawners were collected from different environments, but at the same time, during each year and from the same thermal conditions. Thus, the observed differences (however, not statistically confirmed) in effects of artificial reproduction between 3 years of the study among both stocks might result from the different thermal characteristics of respective reservoirs. During seasons with larger, rapid changes in water temperature, the individual variability of reproductive rhythms usually increases. It has an important effect on the spawning success of tench, where thermal fluctuations are the cause of reproduction failure in numerous cases (Horoszewicz 1983; Alas and Solak 2004; Benzer et al. 2007). During season II of the experiment, the lowest percentages of ovulated females and embryos survival rates were observed (without statistical differences). This might result from the adverse effect of temperature prior to spawning. Similarly, the negative influence of thermal fluctuation shortly before spawning on spawning effectiveness, expressed as the percentage of ovulated females and embryo survival rate, was recorded for cyprinids such as ide Leuciscus idus (L.) and asp Aspius aspius (L.) by Targońska et al. (2010 and unpublished) and also for burbot Lota lota (L.) by Żarski et al. (2010) .
Differences in the latency time of tench were observed in the case of different spawning agents, but not in the case of fish origin. CPH usually involves a shorter latency time than Ovopel, and this was noted not only in the case of cyprinids (Brzuska 2005; Kucharczyk et al. 2005; Krejszeff et al. 2008) but also for percids (Kucharczyk et al. 1996, 1998; Szczerbowski et al. 2009). Domesticated fish were reported to be able to spawn under controlled conditions without hormonal stimulation, and the latency time was much shorter (Krejszeff et al. 2010). The data obtained for tench were the opposite. In the present study, no differences were noted for spermatozoa motility or embryo survival for either stocks of tench. There were also no differences between groups treated with different hormonal preparations among the populations. The survival rate was very high and similar to those reported by other authors (Kucharczyk et al. 2007; Kujawa et al. 2009). Thus, it could be assumed that environmental differences in an earthen pond and lake are insignificant, and these reservoirs are both suitable for tench management. Generally, the obtained results of artificial reproduction of wild and domesticated tench under controlled conditions showed many similarities. It suggests that the method developed for cultured stock might be used successfully for wild fish, and there is a high possibility to synchronize the ovulation in fish originating from different stocks. For this purpose, among the tested agents, Ovopel is recommended due to both its reproductive and economic effectiveness (Hakuć-Błażowska et al. 2009, 2010).
References
Alas A, Solak K (2004) The reproductive biology of the Tench (Tinca tinca L. 1758) in Kayabogazi (Ktahya, Turkey) Dam Lake. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 28:879–885
Babiak I, Glogowski J, Kujawa R, Kucharczyk D, Mamcarz A (1998) Cryopreservation of sperm from asp Aspius aspius. Progr Fish-Cult 60:146–148
Benzer SS, Gul A, Yilmaz M (2007) Breeding properties of Tinca tinca (L, 1758) Living in Hirfanlı Dam Lake (Kırşehir, Turkey). EU J. Fish Aquat Sc 24:127–129
Brzuska E (2005) Artificial spawning of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), differences between females of Polish strain 6 and Hungarian strain W treated with carp pituitary homogenate, Ovopel or Dagin. Aquacult Res 36:1015–1025. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01311.x
Cejko BI, Kowalski RK, Kucharczyk D, Targońska K, Krejszeff S, Żarski D, Glogowski J (2010) Influence of the length of time after hormonal stimulation on selected parameters of milt of ide Leuciscus idus L. Aquacult Res 41:804–813. doi:101111/j1365-2109200902357x
Gela D, Linhart O, Flajšhans M, Rodina M (2003) Egg incubation time and hatching success in tench (Tinca tinca L.) related to the procedure of egg stickiness elimination. J Appl Ichthyol 19:132–133. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00465.x
Gela D, Flajshans M, Kocour M, Rodina M, Linhart O (2006) Tench (Tinca tinca) broodstock management in breeding station under conditions of pond culture: a review. Aquacult Int 14:195–203. doi:101007/s10499-005-9025-y
Glogowski J, Babiak I, Kucharczyk D, Luczynski M (1997) The effect of individual male variability on cryopreservation of bream (Abramis brama L.) sperm. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 44:281–285
Glogowski J, Babiak I, Kucharczyk D, Luczynski M, Piros B (1999) Some properties of bream Abramis brama L. sperm and its cryopreservation. Aquacult Res 30:765–772. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2109.1999.00399.x
Hakuć-Błażowska A, Kupren K, Turkowski K, Targońska K, Jamróz M, Krejszeff S, Kwiatkowski M, Żarski D, Kucharczyk D (2009) Comparison of economic effectiveness of applying different hormonal agents in asp Aspius aspius (L.) and ide Leuciscus idus (L.). Pol J Nat Sci 24:224–234. doi:10.2478/v10020-009-0021-y
Hakuć-Błażowska A, Kupren K, Turkowski K, Targońska K, Żarski D, Kucharczyk D (2010) A comparison of the economic effectiveness of various spawning agents for stimulating the reproduction of the cultured and wild forms of the common barbel Barbus barbus (L.). Pol J Nat Sci (in press)
Harada Y, Yokota M, Iizuka M (1998) Genetic risk of domestication in artificial fish stocking and its possible reduction. Res Popul Ecol 40(3):311–324
Horoszewicz L (1981) Effect of different thermal regimes on reproductive cycles of tench Tinca tinca (L.) Part VIII towards understanding of reproduction mechanisms and requirements for controlled spawning. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 28:257–262
Horoszewicz L (1983) Reproductive rhythm in tench Tinca tinca, in fluctuating temperatures. Aquaculture 32(1/2):79–92
Horvath L, Szabo T, Burke J (1997) Hatchery testing of GnRH analogue-containing pellets on ovulation in four cyprinid species. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 44:221–226
Kokurewicz B (1970) The effect of temperature on embryonic development of Tinca tinca (L.) and Rutilus rutilus (L.). Zool Polon 20(3):317–338
Kouřil J (1998) Hormonally induced spawning of tench Tinca tinca (L.) females. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 45:415–433
Kouril J, Barth T, Hamackova J, Flegel M (1986) Induced ovulation in tench (Tinca tinca L.) by various LH-RH synthetic analogues: effect of site of administration and temperature. Aquaculture 54:37–44
Krejszeff S, Kucharczyk D, Kupren K, Targońska K, Mamcarz A, Kujawa R, Kaczkowski Z, Ratajski S (2008) Reproduction of chub, Leuciscus cephalus L., under controlled conditions. Aquacult Res 39:907–912. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01942.x
Krejszeff S, Targońska K, Żarski D, Kucharczyk D (2009) Domestication affects spawning of the ide (Leuciscus idus)-preliminary study. Aquaculture 295:145–147. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.06.032
Krejszeff S, Targońska K, Żarski D, Kucharczyk D (2010) Comparison of artificial reproduction of two different spawn-forms of the chub. Rep Biol (in press)
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Skrzypczak A, Wyszomirska E (1996) Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L. using carp pituitary extract and HCG. Aquacult Res 27:847–852
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Luczynski M, Glogowski J, Babiak I, Wyszomirska E (1997a) Induced spawning in bream, Abramis brama (L.), using carp pituitary extract and hCG. Aquacult Res 28:139–144
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Wyszomirska E (1997b) Induced spawning in rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus L.). Pol Arch Hydrobiol 44:207–211
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Wyszomirska E (1997c) Artificial spawning in bream (Abramis brama L.). Pol Arch Hydrobiol 44:201–205
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Skrzypczak A, Wyszomirska E (1998) Induced spawning in perch, Perca fluviatilis L., using FSH + LH with pimozide or metoclopramide. Aquacult Res 29:131–136. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2109.1998.00949.x
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Targońska-Dietrich K, Wyszomirska E, Glogowski J, Babiak I, Szabo T (2005) Induced spawning in bream (Abramis brama L.) using pellets containing GnRH. Czech J Anim Sci 50:89–95
Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Targońska K, Krejszeff S, Wyszomirska E (2007) Artificial spawning of common tench (Tinca tinca L.) collected from wild populations. Pol J Nat Sci 22:107–115
Kucharczyk D, Targońska K, Hliwa P, Gomułka P, Kwiatkowski M, Krejszeff S, Perkowski J (2008) Reproductive parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) spawners during natural season and out-of-season spawning. Reprod Biol 8(3):285–289
Kujawa R, Kucharczyk D, Mamcarz A (1999) A model system for keeping spawners of wild and domestic fish before artificial spawning. Aquacult Eng 20:85–89. doi:10.1016/S0144-8609(99)00004-7
Kujawa R, Kucharczyk D, Mamcarz A (2009) The effect of tannin concentration and egg unsticking time on the hatching success of tench Tinca tinca (L.) larvae. Rev Fish Biol Fish (in press). doi:101007/s11160-009-9136-z
Linhart O, Billard R (1995) Biology of gametes and artificial reproduction in common tench Tinca tinca (L.). Pol Arch Hydrobiol 42:37–56
Linhart O, Kvasnicka P, Flajshans M, Kasal A, Rab P, Palecek J, Slechta V, Hamackova J, Prokes M (1995) Genetic studies with tench, Tinca tinca L.: induced meiotic gynogenesis and sex reversal. Aquaculture 132:239–251. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(95)00012-Q
Linhart O, Rodina M, Kocour M, Gela D (2006) Insemination, fertilization and gamete management in tench, Tinca tinca (L.). Aquacult Int 14:61–73
Mamcarz A, Skrzypczak A (2006) Changes in commercially exploited populations of tench, Tinca tinca (L.), in littoral zones of lakes of northeastern Poland. Aquacult Int 14:171–177. doi:101007/s10499-005-9023-0
Mamcarz A, Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R (2006) Reciprocal hybrids of tench Tinca tinca (L.) × bream Abramis brama (L.), and tench × carp Cyprinus carpio L., and some characteristics of their early development. Aquacult Int 14:27–33. doi:10.1007/s10499-005-9011-4
Podhorec P, Kouril J (2009) Induction of final oocyte maturation in Cyprinidae fish by hypothalamic factors: a review. Vet Med 54:97–110
Regadera JJ (1995) Reproduction of tench Tinca tinca (L. 1758) in spawning ponds, Badajoz, Spain. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 42:57–61
Rodina M, Cosson J, Gela D, Linhart O (2004) Kurokura solution as immobilizing medium for spermatozoa of tench (Tinca tinca L.). Aquacult Int 12:119–131. doi:10.1023/B:AQUI.0000017192.75993.e3
Skrzypczak A, Mamcarz A (2006) Changes in commercially exploited populations of tench, Tinca tinca (L.) in lakes of Northeastern Poland. Aquacult Int 14:179–193. doi:101007/s10499-005-9024-z
Steffens W (1995) The tench (Tinca tinca L.), a neglected pond fish species. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 42:161–180
Szabo T, Medgyasszay C, Horváth L (2002) Ovulation induction in nase (Chondrostoma nasus, Cyprinidae) using pituitary extract or GnRH analogue combined with domperidone. Aquaculture 203:389–395. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00635-4
Szczerbowski A, Kucharczyk D, Mamcarz A, Łuczyński MJ, Targońska K, Kujawa R (2009) Artificial off-season spawning of Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis L. Arch Pol Fish 17:95–98. doi:10.2478/v10086-009-0008-x
Targońska K, Kucharczyk D, Kujawa R, Mamcarz A, Żarski D (2010) Controlled reproduction of asp, Aspius aspius (L.) using luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues with dopamine inhibitors. Aquaculture 306:407–410. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.027
Vrijenhoek RC (1998) Conservation genetics of freshwater fish. J Fish Biol 53:394–412
Wang J, Min W, Guan M, Gong L, Ren J, Huang Z, Zheng H, Zhang J, Liu H, Han Y (2006) Tench farming in China: present status and future prospects. Aquacult Int 14:205–208. doi:101007/s10499-005-9026-x
Yaron Z, Bogomolnaya A, Drori S, Biton I, Aizen J, Kulikovsky Z, Levavi–Sivan B (2009) Spawning induction in the carp, past experience and future prospects. Israeli J Aquacult—Bamidgeh 61:5–26
Żarski D, Kucharczyk D, Targońska K, Jamróz M, Krejszeff S, Mamcarz A (2009) Application of Ovopel, Ovaprim and their combination in artificial reproduction of two rheophilic cyprinid fishes. Pol J Nat Sci 24:235–244. doi:10.2478/v10020-009-0022-x
Żarski D, Kucharczyk D, Sasinowski W, Targońska K, Mamcarz A (2010) The influence of temperature on successful reproduction of burbot Lota lota L. under the hatchery conditions. Pol J Nat Sci 25:93–105. doi:10.2478/v10020-010-0007-9
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kujawa, R., Kucharczyk, D., Mamcarz, A. et al. Artificial spawning of common tench Tinca tinca (Linnaeus, 1758), obtained from wild and domestic stocks. Aquacult Int 19, 513–521 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-010-9366-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-010-9366-z