Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socio-economic factors critical for intensification of fish farming technology. A case of selected villages in Morogoro and Dar es Salaam regions, Tanzania

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intensification of farm technologies has shown high potential in improving farm production and enhancing rural food and income security. Intensification, however, is commodity-specific with high-value crops intensively produced. Farmed fish is one of the high-value crops introduced in the study area to meet the above ends. The problem, however, is that the level of intensifying fish farming technology has been very low leading to discouraging results. A study was conducted in Morogoro and Dar es Salaam Regions, Tanzania, to identify socio-economic factors that influence the intensification of fish farming technology. Data were collected from 234 respondents randomly sampled from 25 selected villages and were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression model. Results indicated that age, extension education, profitability, marketability, risk, palatability and easiness to obtain farmed fish were significant in explaining the intensification of fish farming technology. Three recommendations emerge from this finding. First, there is need to provide extension education to the practicing farmers on various aspects of fish farming. The probability of intensifying fish farming is higher for knowledgeable farmers. Second, technology developers should strive to reduce the risk of farming fish and improve the profitability and marketability of farmed fish. Finally, any analysis focusing on intensification of a fish farming technology should not confine itself to agronomic and socio-economic characteristics but should also encompass food characteristics of the technology. Food variables such as palatability and easiness to obtain farmed fish have been shown to influence the intensification of fish farming technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Intensity of adoption measures the actual adoption against the recommended level (Nkonya et al. 1997). It gives an understanding as to what extent the adopted technology has been based on the recommendations (Kisusu 2003). Determination of intensity of technology adoption helps to assess the gap between the actual and the recommended amount (ibid.).

  2. ALCOM was a FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) aquatic programme which operated in Tanzania between 1993 and 2000.

References

  • Abdoulaye T, Sanders JH (2005) Stages and determinants of fertilizer use in semiarid African agriculture: the Niger experience. Agric Econ 32:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALCOM (1994) Background report on fish farming in Morogoro, Tanzania. ALCOM, Morogoro, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Alene AD, Manyong VM (2006) Farmer-to-farmer technology diffusion and yield variation among adopters: the case of improved cowpea in Northern Nigeria. Agric Econ 35:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baidu-Forson J (1999) Factors influencing adoption of land-enhancing technology in Sahel: lessons from a case study in Niger. Agric Econ 20(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batz FJ, Peter KJ, Janssen W (1999) The influence of technology characteristics on the rate and speed of adoption. Agric Econ 21(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP, Town send RF (2000) The growth performance of agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Agric Econ 82(5):1075–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummett RE (2000) The factors affecting fish prices in Southern Malawi. Aquaculture 186(3–4):243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummett RE, Noble R (1995) Aquaculture for African small holding. Technical Report 46. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, 60 pp

  • Edwards P, Demaine H (1997) Rural aquaculture: overview and framework for country reviews. RAP Publication 1997/36. RAP/FAO, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2000) Farm management and production economics service: FAO Inland water resources and aquaculture service. Small ponds make a big difference. Integrating fish and livestock farming. FAO, Rome, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gockowski J, Ndoumbe M (2004) The adoption of intensive monocrop horticulture in Southern Cameroon. Agric Econ 30:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague M (1992) The economic and feasibility of aquaculture in Northern Tanzania. BA dissertation, University of Stirling, Scotland, 40 pp

  • Kaliba ARM, Featherstone, Norman DW (1997) A stall feeding management for improved cattle in semi and cultural Tanzania: factors influencing adoption. Agric Econ 17(2–3):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisusu R (2003) Adoption and impact of dairy and irrigation rice technologies on poverty alleviation in Dodoma, Tanzania. PhD thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, 185 pp

  • Manyong VM, Okike I, Williams TO (2006) Effective dimensionality and factors affecting crop-livestock integration in West Africa savannas: a combination of principal components analysis and Tobit approaches. Agric Econ 35:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugenda O, Mugenda A (1999) Research methods: quantitative and qualitative approaches. African Center for Technology Studies (ACTS) Press, Nairobi, p 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkonya E, Shroeder T, Norman D (1997) Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seed and fertilizer in Northern Tanzania. J Agric Econ 48:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polson RA, Spenser SC (1991) The technology adoption process in subsistence agriculture: the case of cassava in Southwestern Nigeria. Agric Syst 36(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics (TNBS) (2002) Household budget survey (HBS) 2000/01. Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs (MFEA) Publishing, Dar es Salaam, 24 pp

  • Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics (TNBS) (2009) Household budget survey (HBS) 2007. Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs (MFEA) Publishing, Dar es Salaam, 94 pp

  • Todaro M (1982) Economics for a developing world, 2nd edn. Longman Group Limited, Essex, p 434

    Google Scholar 

  • URT (2004) AGSTATS for food security, vol 1. Preliminary food crop forecast for 2004/05 food security showing vulnerable areas. MAFS Publishing, Dar es Salaam, 55 pp

  • URT (2005) National strategy for growth and reduction of poverty (NSGRP). Vice President’s Office, Dar es Salaam, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetengere KKJ (2008) Economic factors critical to adoption of fish farming technology. A case of selected villages in Morogoro and Dar es Salaam regions. PhD thesis, Open University of Tanzania Dar es Salaam, 242 pp

  • Wetengere KK (2009) Socio-economic factors critical for adoption of fish farming technology: the case of selected villages in Eastern Tanzania. Int J Fish Aquac 1(3):028–039

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetengere KK (2010) Determinants of adoption of a recommended package of fish farming technology: the case of selected villages in Eastern Tanzania. Adv J Food Sci Technol 2(1):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetengere K, Osewe K, van Herwaarden H (1998) Development of semi-intensive fish farming in Morogoro region Tanzania. ALCOM Working paper No. 22 FAO, Harare, 54 pp

  • Woelcke J (2006) Technology and policy option for sustainable agricultural intensification in Eastern Uganda. Agric Econ 34:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Institute of Social Work (ISW) and the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) are gratefully acknowledged for providing the enabling grant for this research. The author is sincerely grateful to the various reviewers for their helpful comments regarding the drafts of this study. The final content of this article, however, is the sole responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kitojo Wetengere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetengere, K. Socio-economic factors critical for intensification of fish farming technology. A case of selected villages in Morogoro and Dar es Salaam regions, Tanzania. Aquacult Int 19, 33–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-010-9339-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-010-9339-2

Keywords

Navigation