Skip to main content
Log in

Learning goal orientation and creative performance: The differential mediating roles of challenge and enjoyment intrinsic motivations

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a theoretical model to account for the effect of learning goal orientation on creative performance by distinguishing two dimensions of intrinsic motivation as mediators. Challenge intrinsic motivation is concerned with the interest in and excitement of solving problems and tackling complex tasks, whereas enjoyment intrinsic motivation is concerned with the enjoyment of task activities for self-expression and self-entertainment. Results from a sample of 189 Chinese employees support this model and show that learning goal orientation had significant positive relationships with both dimensions of intrinsic motivation, but only challenge intrinsic motivation was significantly related to creative performance and mediated the positive relationship between learning goal orientation and creative performance. As predicted, intellectual stimulation, a dimension of transformational leadership, showed a moderating effect, such that learning goal orientation was less strongly related to challenge intrinsic motivation when intellectual stimulation was high. In addition, a moderated mediation effect was found, such that the mediating effect of challenge intrinsic motivation for the relationship between learning goal orientation and creative performance was weaker when intellectual stimulation was high. No such moderation effect was found for enjoyment intrinsic motivation, providing further support for the differential roles of these two dimensions of intrinsic motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. 1994. The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 950–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., & Kramer, S. 2011. The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. 2008. Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.). Handbook of organizational creativity: 31–62. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. 1999. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. 2008. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin, 134: 779–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., Slater, F., & Kelloway, E. K. 2000. Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence: An exploratory study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21: 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

  • Bass, B. M. 1990. From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. 1997. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American Psychologist, 52: 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. 1995. Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. 2006. Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11: 142–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. 1986. The wording and translation of research instrument. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.). Field methods in cross-cultural research: 137–164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. 2010. The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95: 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., & Nouri, R. 2010. Creativity: The influence of cultural, social, and work contexts. Management and Organization Review, 6: 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. 1998. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2: 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. 2001. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. 2009. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Zhu, J., & Lee, D. R. 2013a. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 827–851.

  • Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Chang, S. 2013b. Core knowledge employee creativity and firm performance: The moderating role of riskiness orientation, firm size, and realized absorptive capacity. Personnel Psychology, 66: 443–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. 2011. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C.-H., & Sacramento, C. A. 2011. How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 624–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. 2009. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. 1996. Processing goals, task interest, and the mood–performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24: 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatepe, O. M., & Tekinkus, M. 2006. The effects of work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and intrinsic motivation on job outcomes of front-line employees. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24: 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivetz, R. 2003. The effects of effort and intrinsic motivation on risky choice. Marketing Science, 22: 477–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. 2001. Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36: 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L., Huang, X., & Lau, D. 2012. Leadership research in Asia: Taking the road less traveled?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. K., Sheldon, K. M., & Turban, D. B. 2003. Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, G. S., Cravens, D. W., Grant, K., & Moncrief, W. C. 2001. Antecedents and consequences of salesperson burnout. European Journal of Marketing, 35: 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., Lin, X., & Leung, K. 2012. Goal orientation and innovative performance: The mediating roles of knowledge sharing and perceived autonomy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42: E180–E197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. 2010. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36: 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology: 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., & Leung, K. 2010. Creativity East and West: Perspectives and parallels. Management and Organization Review, 6: 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. 2005. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 852–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. 2010. The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21: 34–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. M. 2012. Toward the trusted public organization: Untangling the leadership, motivation, and trust relationship in US Federal Agencies. American Review of Public Administration, 42: 562–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. 2007. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 128–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. 2008. Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20: 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31: 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42: 185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K. 2007. Asian management research needs broader initiatives and focused incentives. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4): 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliott, A. J. 1999. Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 326–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. 2007. Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 855–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. 2004. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. 2001. Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of information and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. 2008. Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.). Handbook of organizational creativity: 3–31. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30: 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. 1993. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4: 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. 2003. Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7: 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggar, S. 2002. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. 2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. 1999. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52: 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandeWalle, D. 1997. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57: 995–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandeWalle, D. 2003. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13: 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S., Tareq, M., & Kanazawa, Y. 2011. When openness to experience and conscientiousness affect continuous learning: A mediating role of intrinsic motivation and a moderating role of occupation. Japanese Psychological Research, 53: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zampetakis, L. A., Bouranta, N., & Moustakis, V. S. 2010. On the relationship between individual creativity and time management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5: 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China Grants (71121001, 70972024, and 70890081) and Ministry of Education of China Grants (20090002110037 and 06JJD630013) awarded to Guoquan Chen.

A short version of this article was published in the Best Paper Proceedings of the 2012 Academy of Management Meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingting Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leung, K., Chen, T. & Chen, G. Learning goal orientation and creative performance: The differential mediating roles of challenge and enjoyment intrinsic motivations. Asia Pac J Manag 31, 811–834 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9367-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9367-3

Keywords

Navigation