Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Training Interventions on Organizational Readiness to Support Innovations in Juvenile Justice Offices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical trials on technology transfer models are rare, even with the interest in advancing the uptake of evidence-based practices in social service agencies. This article presents the results from a trial examining different transfer strategies to assist juvenile justice caseworkers in using screening, assessment, and case planning practices to address mental health and substance use needs. Study findings examine factors that promote organizational readiness. A clinical trial was conducted examining the impact of three post-training strategies: an external coach to build the social network of the justice office (build social climate), an external coach to educate staff (build skills and knowledge), and a control condition consisting of traditional management directives (directives to staff of agency priorities). All groups were exposed to a 1 day refresher course in motivational interviewing. The social network and skill building groups also attended an intensive 3-day training followed by three on-site booster sessions over a 12 month period of time. Twelve juvenile justice offices (with their 231 juvenile justice staff) were assigned to one of three conditions. The study examined the impact of different transfer conditions on organizational readiness to implement the innovation of screening, assessment, and referral strategies. External coaching targeting the social climate of the justice office to support innovations improved organizational readiness to change, regardless of office size. Coaching that targeted either the social climate or staff knowledge and skills both improved organizational readiness for change compared to management directives, but social climate coaching resulted in greater improvements in receptivity to change. No individual level features of case workers (e.g., age, gender, years of experience) significantly predicted organizational readiness to change. Unexpectedly, the skill and knowledge building approach did not perform any better than management directives only (no post training) efforts. Organizational readiness has been found to be an important factor supporting agencies’ adoption of evidence-based practices. Techniques devoted to attending to the social climate are critical to increasing organizational readiness. External coach facilitators can accomplish this through modest means (three post training booster sessions) that build internal expertise and resiliency in support of the change. This is a low cost method of preparing a low resourced environment such as juvenile justice agencies to use evidence-based practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We examined other covariates as well, including years working with juvenile offenders, years working in the juvenile justice agency, age, educational level, and whether the case manager supervised youth on formal and informal probation. None of these variables were related to baseline organizational functioning, or change over time, and therefore these variables were dropped from further consideration.

  2. Please note that the quadratic variance term was fixed to 0 to achieve model convergence.

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 451–474. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2006). Mindfulness-based treatment approaches: Clinician’s guide to evidence base and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binard, J., & Prichard, M. (2008). Model policies for juvenile justice and substance abuse treatment: A report by reclaiming futures. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263–296. doi:10.1177/1534484307303035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D., Chatman, J., & O’Reilly, C. (1990). Building organizational commitment: A multi-firm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(3), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, K. O., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Simpson, D. D. (2007). Using organizational assessment as a tool for program change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.024.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). Alcohol use from ages 9 to 16: A cohort-sequential latent growth model. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(1), 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.06.001.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., Young, D. W., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Effects of organizational factors on use of juvenile supervision practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. B., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. H., Green, C. A., Hoffman, K. A., Wisdom, J. P., Riley, K. J., Bergmann, L., et al. (2007). Process improvement needs in substance abuse treatment: admissions walk-through results. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(4), 379–389. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.02.003.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. E., Rieckmann, T., Nunes, E. V., Miller, M., Arfken, C., Edmundson, E., et al. (2007). Organizational readiness for change and opinions toward treatment innovations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 183–192. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.026.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, G. (2008). Careers in social and rehabilitation services. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgenson, D. L. (1982). The problem of transfer calls for partnership. Training & Development Journal, 30, 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C. (2007). Assessing and changing organizational culture and climate for effective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 736–747. doi:10.1177/1049731507301659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006). The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(8), 855–880. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., Landsverk, J., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Hoagwood, K. E., Mayberg, S., et al. (2008). Assessing the organizational social context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for research and practice. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 35(1–2), 98–113. doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., Schoenwald, S. K., Hemmelgarn, A., Green, P., Dukes, D., Armstrong, K. S., et al. (2010). Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(4), 537–550. doi:10.1037/a0019160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. (1997). Training in organizations. New York: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, W. E. K., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 197–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, J., Viglione, J., Eley, E., James-Andrews, S., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Organizational readiness in corrections. Federal Probation Journal, 75(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, B. (2002). Demographic dynamics and sustainability: Insights from an integrated, multi-country simulation model. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/dem/wpaper/wp-2002-039.html

  • Liddle, H. A., Dakof, G. A., Henderson, C. E., & Rowe, C. L. (2011). Implementation outcomes of multidimensional family therapy-detention to community: A reintegration program for drug-using juvenile detainees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 587–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). MI, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Mount, K. A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change.. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., Sorensen, J. L., Selzer, J. A., & Brigham, G. S. (2006). Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: A review with suggestions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(1), 25–39. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Moyers, T. B., Martinez, J., & Pirritano, M. (2004). A Randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1050–1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2006). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: A research based guide. (NIH Publication No. 06–5316). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2009). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research based guide, second edition. (NIH Publication No. 094180). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  • Orthner, D. K., Cook, P., Sabah, Y., & Rosenfeld, J. (2006). Organizational learning: A cross-national pilot-test of effectiveness in children’s services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(1), 70–78. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizen behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, P. M., & Johnson, J. A. (2002). Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 211–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. M. (2002). The knowledge needs of innovating organisations. Retrieved December 22, 2010, from http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/4417/

  • Strategies, Drug. (2005). Bridging the gap: A guide to drug treatment in the juvenile justice system. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusion, offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision model. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2011). Implementation of evidence-based community corrections and addiction treatment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., Cropsey, K. L., Young, D. W., & Wexler, H. (2007a). Screening, assessment, and referral practices in adult correctional settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(9), 1216–1234. doi:10.1177/0093854807304431.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., Henderson, C. E., & Belenko, S. (2009). Organizational context, systems change, and adopting treatment delivery systems in the criminal justice system. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103(Supplement 1), S1–S6. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, James-Andrews, & Yeres, (2009). JAARP Curriculum. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., Young, D. W., Wiersema, B., Rhodes, A., & Mitchell, S. (2007b). The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices survey: Multilevel survey methods and procedures. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 225–238. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.01.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NIDA Blending Team (2007). Motivational Interviewing Assessment: Supervisory Tools for Enhancing Proficiency (MIA:STEP). Washington, DC: NIDA Blending Team. Retrieved from http://www.nattc.org/explore/priorityareas/science/blendinginitiative/miastep/product_materials.asp

  • Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Generalization of employee involvement training to the job setting: Individual and situational effects. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 607–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Whited, A. L., Keating, J. M., Musabegovic, H., & Huo, Y. (2008). Juvenile probation officers’ mental health decision making. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(5), 410–422. doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0183-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., Dembo, R., & Henderson, C. (2007). A national survey of substance abuse treatment for juvenile offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 255–266. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.018.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. W., Farrell, J., & Taxman, F. S. (2012). Impacts of juvenile probation training models on youth recidivism. Justice Quarterly. doi:10(1080/07418825).2012.673633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., Moline, K., Farrell, J., & Bierie, D. (2006). Best implementation practices: Disseminating new assessment technologies in a juvenile justice agency. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 135–158. doi:10.1177/0011128705281752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, R01 DA18759. All opinions are those of the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or any governmental agency.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, 4400 University Blvd, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA

    Faye S. Taxman

  2. Department of Psychology, Sam Houston University, Box 2447, Huntsville, TX, 77341, USA

    Craig Henderson

  3. Institute for Government Research, 4321 Hartwick Rd., Suite 208, College Park, MD, 20742-3225, USA

    Doug Young

  4. School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Jill Farrell

Authors
  1. Faye S. Taxman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Craig Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doug Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jill Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faye S. Taxman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taxman, F.S., Henderson, C., Young, D. et al. The Impact of Training Interventions on Organizational Readiness to Support Innovations in Juvenile Justice Offices. Adm Policy Ment Health 41, 177–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0445-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0445-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation