Abstract
Emerging issues and new challenges of globalization have forced companies to design their supply chains for not only minimizing cost but also considering other factors. Supply chains are exposed to new environmental regulations to reduce their carbon emissions and compelled to consider other overlooked factors, such as risk. In this paper, we consider a multi-echelon multimodal supply chain network design problem with multiple products and components that take economic, environmental and risk factors into account. The problem is modeled as a Mixed Integer Linear Programming model and constrained by a carbon cap-and-trade scheme and a risk threshold. This novel problem realistically portrays the supply chain network design considering sustainability and reliability factors simultaneously. The proposed model has been tested on randomly generated hypothetical but realistic test instances. The impacts of different risk thresholds and unit carbon prices on the supply chain cost, risk and emissions are analyzed. The effects of multimodal transportation modes on cost, risk and emissions are also tested. Results prove that using multimodal transportation decreases supply chain cost and carbon emission. In addition, the total supply chain cost and carbon emission increase if the decision maker is risk-averse. The choice of transportation modes is sensitive only to emission levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All test problem data and their solutions are provided as an online supplement at https://okabadurmus.yasar.edu.tr/research/sc2018/.
References
Ahranjani, P. M., Ghaderi, S. F., Azadeh, A., & Babazadeh, R. (2020). Robust design of a sustainable and resilient bioethanol supply chain under operational and disruption risks. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 22(1), 119–151.
Alizadeh, M., Ma, J., Marufuzzaman, M., & Yu, F. (2019). Sustainable olefin supply chain network design under seasonal feedstock supplies and uncertain carbon tax rate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 280–299.
Avi-Yonah, R. S., & Uhlmann, D. M. (2009). Combating global climate change: Why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 28, 3–50.
Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., & Paquet, M. (2011). Designing supply chains with sustainability considerations. Production Planning & Control, 22(8), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.543554.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–62.
Choudhary, A., Sarkar, S., Settur, S., & Tiwari, M. (2015). A carbon market sensitive optimization model for integrated forward-reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.08.015.
Diabat, A., & Al-Salem, M. (2015). An integrated supply chain problem with environmental considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.004.
Environmental Commissioner of Ontario. (2016). Introduction to cap and trade in ontario: Appendix a to the ecos greenhouse gas progress report 2016. Progress report. Technical report, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario. https://media.assets.eco.on.ca/web/2016/11/Appendix-A-Introduction-to-Cap-and-Trade-in-Ontario.pdf. Retrieved 15 February, 2020.
Fahimnia, B., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2016). Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 91, 306–324.
Fahimnia, B., Jabbarzadeh, A., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 119, 129–148.
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Boland, J., Reisi, M., & Goh, M. (2015). Policy insights from a green supply chain optimisation model. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6522–6533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.958592.
Goulder, L. H., & Schein, A. R. (2013). Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: A critical review. Climate Change Economics, 4(3), 1350010–1–1350010–28.
Han, S., Jiang, Y., Zhao, L., Leung, S. C., & Luo, Z. (2017). Weight reduction technology and supply chain network design under carbon emission restriction. Annals of Operations Research,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2696-8.
Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001.
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467.
Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Sabouhi, F. (2018). Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: Sustainability analysis under disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5945–5968.
Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2019). Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 309–354.
Kull, T. J., & Talluri, S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.922627.
Le, T. P. N., & Lee, T. R. (2013). Model selection with considering the CO\(_2\) emission alone the global supply chain. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(4), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0613-6.
Liotta, G., Stecca, G., & Kaihara, T. (2015). Optimisation of freight flows and sourcing in sustainable production and transportation networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.016.
McKinnon, A., & Piecyk, M. (2010). Measuring and managing \(\text{CO}^2\) emissions. Technical report, European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC). https://cefic.org/app/uploads/2018/12/MeasuringAndManagingCO2EmissionOfEuropeanTransport-McKinnon-24.01.2011-REPORT_TRANSPORT_AND_LOGISTICS.pdf. Retrieved 3 February, 2020.
Moradinasab, N., Amin-Naseri, M., Behbahani, T. J., & Jafarzadeh, H. (2018). Competition and cooperation between supply chains in multi-objective petroleum green supply chain: A game theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 818–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.114.
Piecyk, M., Browne, M., Whiteing, A., & McKinnon, A. (2015). Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
Rabbani, M., Saravi, N. A., Farrokhi-Asl, H., Lim, S. F. W., & Tahaei, Z. (2018). Developing a sustainable supply chain optimization model for switchgrass-based bioenergy production: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.226.
Rahmani, D., & Mahoodian, V. (2017). Strategic and operational supply chain network design to reduce carbon emission considering reliability and robustness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 607–620.
Ramudhin, A., Chaabane, A., Kharoune, M., & Paquet, M. (2008). Carbon market sensitive green supply chain network design. In: 2008 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (pp. 1093–1097). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2008.4738039.
Rezaee, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., & Beamon, B. (2015). Green supply chain network design with stochastic demand and carbon price. Annals of Operations Research,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1936-z.
Rezaee, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., & Beamon, B. (2017). Green supply chain network design with stochastic demand and carbon price. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 463–485.
Shaw, K., Irfan, M., Shankar, R., & Yadav, S. S. (2016). Low carbon chance constrained supply chain network design problem: A benders decomposition based approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 98, 483–497.
Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2013). Modeling a low-carbon garment supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 24(8–9), 851–865.
Trappey, A. J. C., Peng, T. K., & Lin, H. D. (1996). An object-oriented bill of materials system for dynamic product management. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 7(5), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123912.
Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171165.
Tuncel, G., & Alpan, G. (2010). Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study. Computers in Industry, 61(3), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.09.008.
Waltho, C., Elhedhli, S., & Gzara, F. (2019). Green supply chain network design: A review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.003.
World Bank Group. (2017). Carbon pricing watch 2017. Technical report, World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/699641497346643090/Carbon-pricing-watch-2017. Retrieved 6 February, 2020.
Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & Chidambaram, V. (2006). A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Computers in Industry, 57(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.11.001.
Zakeri, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.012.
Zhang, D., Zou, F., Li, S., & Zhou, L. (2017). Green supply chain network design with economies of scale and environmental concerns. Journal of Advanced Transportation,. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6350562.
Zissis, D., Saharidis, G. K., Aktas, E., & Ioannou, G. (2018). Emission reduction via supply chain coordination. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 36–46.
Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk m anagement. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2003.tb00156.x.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kabadurmus, O., Erdogan, M.S. Sustainable, multimodal and reliable supply chain design. Ann Oper Res 292, 47–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03654-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03654-0