Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolving Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Problems with Objective Replacement

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the strategies for multi-objective optimization in a dynamic environment. In particular, we focus on problems with objective replacement, where some objectives may be replaced with new objectives during evolution. It is shown that the Pareto-optimal sets before and after the objective replacement share some common members. Based on this observation, we suggest the inheritance strategy. When objective replacement occurs, this strategy selects good chromosomes according to the new objective set from the solutions found before objective replacement, and then continues to optimize them via evolution for the new objective set. The experiment results showed that this strategy can help MOGAs achieve better performance than MOGAs without using the inheritance strategy, where the evolution is restarted when objective replacement occurs. More solutions with better quality are found during the same time span.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. J. Grefenstette (1999) ArticleTitleEvolvability in Dynamic Fitness Landscapes: A Genetic Algorithm Approach Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 3 1999–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Karcz-Duleba (2001) ArticleTitleDynamics of Infinite Populations Evolving in a Landscape of uni- and Bi-modal Fitness Functions IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5 IssueID4 398–409

    Google Scholar 

  • P. D. Stroud (2001) ArticleTitleKalman-extended Genetic Algorithm for Search in Nonstationary Environments with Noisy Fitness Evaluations IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5 IssueID1 66–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh Sang-Keon Lee Choon-Young Lee Ju-Jang (2002) ArticleTitleA New Distributed Evolutionary Algorithm for Optimization in Nonstationary Environments Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1 378–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A., Tsutsui, S. & Tanaka, H. (1998). Function Optimization in Nonstationary Environment using Steady State Genetic Algorithms with Aging of Individuals. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation 666–671

  • W. Liles K. De Jong (1999) ArticleTitleThe Usefulness of Tag Bits in Changing Environments Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 3 1999–2060

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Michalewicz (1996) Genetic Algorithm + Data Strucutres = Evolution Programs Springer-Verlag Press Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Yu (1985) Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Concepts, Techniques and Extensions Plenum New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Deb A. Pratap S. Agarwal T. Meyarivan (2002) ArticleTitleA Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation 6 IssueID2 182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Srinivas K. Deb (1994) ArticleTitleMultiobjective Optimization using Non-dominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms Evolutionary Computation 2 IssueID3 221–248

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Zitzler L. Thiele (1999) ArticleTitleMultiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3 IssueID4 257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler, E. & Thiele, L. (1998). An Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: The Strength Pareto Approach. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, TIK-Report, No. 43

  • J. D. Knowles D. W. Corne (2000) ArticleTitleApproximating the Nondominated Front using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy Evolutionary Computation 8 IssueID2 149–172

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Laumanns G. Rudolph H. P. Schwefel (1998) ArticleTitleA Spatial Predator–Prey Approach to Multi-objective Optimization Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 5 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Fonseca P. J. Fleming (1998a) ArticleTitleMultiobjective Optimization and Multiple Constraint Handling with Evolutionary Algorithms. I. A Unified Formulation IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 28 IssueID1 26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • C. M. Fonseca P. J. Fleming (1998b) ArticleTitleMultiobjective Optimization and Multiple Constraint Handling with Evolutionary Algorithms. II. Application Example IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 28 IssueID1 38–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamaki, H., Kita, H. & Kobayashi, S. (1996). Multi-objective Optimization by Genetic Algorithms: A Review. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation

  • Fonseca, C. M. & Fleming, P. J. (1993). Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms. Genetic Algorithms for Control Systems Engineering, IEE Colloquium

  • Schaffer, J. D. (1985). Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Genetic Algorithms 93–100

  • Kursawe, F. (1991). A Variant of Evolution Strategies for Vector Optimization. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Springer, 193–197

  • Fonseca, C. M. & Fleming, P. J. (1985). Genetic Algorithms for Multi-objective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization. Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms 141–153

  • Goldberg, D. E. & Richardson, J. (1987). Genetic Algorithms with Sharing for Multimodal Function Optimization. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithm 41–49

  • Knowles, J. D. & Corne, D. W. (2002). On Metrics for Comparing Non-dominated Sets. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1: 723–728

  • J. D. Knowles D. W. Corne M. J. Oates (2000) On the Assessment of Multiobjective Approaches to the Adaptive Distributed Database Management Problem M. Schoenauer (Eds) et al. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN VI Springer Berlin 869–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. P. & Jaszkiewicz, A. (1998). Evaluating the Quality of Approximations to the Nondominated Set Technical report, Institute of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, IMM-REP-1998-7

  • E. Zitzler K. Deb L. Thiele (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results Evolutionary Computation 8 IssueID2 173–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhang-Mehr, A. & Azarm, S. (2002). Diversity Assessment of Pareto Optimal Solution Sets: An Entropy Approach. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1: 723–728

  • Branke, Juergen, (2001). Pareto-Front Exploration with Uncertain Objectives. Proc. First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Zurich, Switzerland, March 7–9, 2001. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 1993: 314–328, Springer

  • Zitzler, E. (1999). Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SHENG-UEI GUAN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GUAN, SU., CHEN, Q. & MO, W. Evolving Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Problems with Objective Replacement. Artif Intell Rev 23, 267–293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-004-5900-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-004-5900-6

Keywords

Navigation