Skip to main content
Log in

A novel “HIV salience and Perception” scale is associated with PrEP dispensing and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low perceived HIV risk is a barrier to effective pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Single-item risk perception measures are stigmatizing and alienating to AGYW and may not predict PrEP use. There is a need for a tool capturing domains of perceived HIV risk and salience that align with PrEP use among AGYW. This HIV PrEP study was conducted in Kampala, Uganda. We developed and piloted the 9-item “HIV Salience and Perception” (HPS) scale (range: 9–36); higher scores indicate beliefs of higher vulnerability to HIV. We administered the scale to Ugandan AGYW participating in an ongoing cohort study at enrollment, one, three and six months. PrEP dispensing was measured quarterly and adherence was measured daily via Wisepill (high adherence: ≥80% of expected pill bottle openings). We assessed scale performance and used generalized estimating equations to determine associations between scale score and PrEP use. Among 499 AGYW, 54.1% of our sample was ≥ 20 years (range:16–25). The median HPS score was 18 (range:8–33; α = 0.77). Higher score was associated with PrEP dispensing (aRR = 1.07 per point increase; 95% CI = 1.01–1.13; p-value = 0.02) in the overall cohort and among only those ≥ 20 years (aRR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.03–1.19; p-value = 0.01). We did not observe an association between scale score and PrEP adherence. AGYW scoring higher on a novel HPS scale were more likely to initiate and obtain PrEP refills through 6 months. This scale may capture drivers of PrEP dispensing and could inform PrEP delivery and counseling for AGYW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

We will consider requests for data and material on a case-by-case basis.

Code Availability

Code is available on request.

References

  1. McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):509–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bekker LG, Roux S, Sebastien E, Yola N, Amico KR, Hughes JP, et al. Daily and non-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis in African women (HPTN 067/ADAPT Cape Town Trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(2):e68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill K, Dietrich J, Gray G, Pidwell T, Kayamba E, Bennie, Thola. Pluspills: an open label, safety and feasibility study of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 15–19 year old adolescents in two sites in South Africa. 9th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science; 2017 Jul 23; Paris, France.

  9. Amico KR, Wallace M, Bekker LG, Roux S, Atujuna M, Sebastian E, et al. Experiences with HPTN 067/ADAPT Study-Provided Open-Label PrEP Among Women in Cape Town: Facilitators and Barriers Within a Mutuality Framework. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1361–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Warren EA, Paterson P, Schulz WS, Lees S, Eakle R, Stadler J, et al. Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maughan-Brown B, Venkataramani AS. Accuracy and determinants of perceived HIV risk among young women in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2017;21(1):42. 18(.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corneli AL, McKenna K, Headley J, Ahmed K, Odhiambo J, Skhosana J, et al. A descriptive analysis of perceptions of HIV risk and worry about acquiring HIV among FEM-PrEP participants who seroconverted in Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(3 Suppl 2):19152.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linnemayr S. HIV prevention through the lens of behavioral economics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(4):e61–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linnemayr S, Rice T. Insights From Behavioral Economics to Design More Effective Incentives for Improving Chronic Health Behaviors, With an Application to Adherence to Antiretrovirals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(2):e50–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Linnemayr S, Stecher C. Behavioral Economics Matters for HIV Research: The Impact of Behavioral Biases on Adherence to Antiretrovirals (ARVs). AIDS Behav. 2015;19(11):2069–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Golub SA. Tensions between the epidemiology and psychology of HIV risk: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Milne J, Brady H, Shato T, Bohn D, Mdladla M, Ngcwayi N, et al. Measuring HIV Risk Perception and Behavior: Results from Round 1 of the Cognitive Interviewing Project with young women and men who have sex with men in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(8):2307–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartmann M, McConnell M, Bekker L-G, Celum C, Bennie T, Zuma J, et al. Motivated Reasoning and HIV Risk? Views on Relationships, Trust, and Risk from Young Women in Cape Town, South Africa, and Implications for Oral PrEP. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(11):3468–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haberer JE, Kidoguchi L, Heffron R, Mugo N, Bukusi E, Katabira E, et al. Alignment of adherence and risk for HIV acquisition in a demonstration project of pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV serodiscordant couples in Kenya and Uganda: a prospective analysis of prevention-effective adherence. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Velloza J, Delany-Moretlwe S, Baeten JM. Comprehensive HIV risk reduction interventions for 2020 and beyond: product choices and effective service-delivery platforms for individual needs and population-level impact. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2019;14(5):423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunbar MS, Kripke K, Haberer J, Castor D, Dalal S, Mukoma W, et al. Understanding and measuring uptake and coverage of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa. Sex Health. 2018;15(6):513–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Celum CL, Delany-Moretlwe S, McConnell M, van Rooyen H, Bekker LG, Kurth A, et al. Rethinking HIV prevention to prepare for oral PrEP implementation for young African women. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):20227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bekker LG, Rebe K, Venter F, Maartens G, Moorhouse M, Conradie F, et al. Southern African guidelines on the safe use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in persons at risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection. South Afr J Hiv Med. 2016;17(1):455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ministry of Health. Consolidated guidelines for prevention and treatment of HIV in Uganda. Kampala: The Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Balkus JE, Brown E, Palanee T, Nair G, Gafoor Z, Zhang J, et al. An Empiric HIV Risk Scoring Tool to Predict HIV-1 Acquisition in African Women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(3):333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradley H, Tsui A, Hindin M, Kidanu A, Gillespie D. Developing scales to measure perceived HIV risk and vulnerability among Ethiopian women testing for HIV. AIDS Care. 2011;23(8):1043–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Napper LE, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL. Development of the perceived risk of HIV scale. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):1075–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Corneli A, Wang M, Agot K, Ahmed K, Lombaard J, Van Damme L, et al. Perception of HIV risk and adherence to a daily, investigational pill for HIV prevention in FEM-PrEP. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(5):555–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carroll JJ, Ngure K, Heffron R, Curran K, Mugo NR, Baeten JM. Gendered differences in the perceived risks and benefits of oral PrEP among HIV-serodiscordant couples in Kenya. AIDS Care. 2016;28(8):1000–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Travill D, Bekker LG, Delaney-Moretlwe S, Bukusi E, Imrie J, Rousseau-Jemwa E, et al. Sexual behavior and PrEP uptake among young African women in a demonstration project about PrEP delivery. International AIDS Society Conference (IAS 2018); 2018 Jul 23; Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

  31. Rousseau-Jemwa E, Bekker LG, Bukusi E, Delaney-Moretlwe S, Omollo V, Travill D, et al. Early Persistence of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in African Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW) from Kenya and South Africa. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018;34:68–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Celum CL, Delany-Moretlwe S, Hosek SG, Dye BJ, Bekker LG, Mgodi NM, et al. Risk behavior, perception, and reasons for PrEP among young African women in HPTN 082. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2018 (CROI); 2018 Mar 4; Boston, Massachusetts.

  33. Kutner BA, King KM, Dorsey S, Creegan E, Simoni JM. The Anal Sex Stigma Scales: A New Measure of Sexual Stigma Among Cisgender Men Who have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(9):2666–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. DeVellis R. Scale development. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications; 2016. 280 p.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cottrell ML, Yang KH, Prince HMA, Sykes C, White N, Malone S, et al. A Translational Pharmacology Approach to Predicting Outcomes of Preexposure Prophylaxis Against HIV in Men and Women Using Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate With or Without Emtricitabine. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(1):55–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Haberer JE, Baeten JM, Campbell J, Wangisi J, Katabira E, Ronald A, et al. Adherence to Antiretroviral Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention: A Substudy Cohort within a Clinical Trial of Serodiscordant Couples in East Africa. PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Scorgie F, Khoza N, Delany-Moretlwe S, Velloza J, Mangxilana N, Atujuna M, et al. Narrative sexual histories and perceptions of HIV risk among young women taking PrEP in southern Africa: Findings from a novel participatory method. Soc Sci Med. 2020;270:113600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vargas SE, Fava JL, Severy L, Rosen RK, Salomon L, Shulman L, et al. Psychometric Properties and Validity of a Multi-dimensional Risk Perception Scale Developed in the Context of a Microbicide Acceptability Study. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(2):415–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hill LM, Maseko B, Chagomerana M, Hosseinipour MC, Bekker LG, Pettifor A, et al. HIV risk, risk perception, and PrEP interest among adolescent girls and young women in Lilongwe, Malawi: operationalizing the PrEP cascade. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(S3):e25502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Underhill K, Guthrie KM, Colleran C, Calabrese SK, Operario D, Mayer KH. Temporal Fluctuations in Behavior, Perceived HIV Risk, and Willingness to Use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(7):2109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wanga V, Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Mugo NR, Asiimwe S, Ngure K, et al. Sexual Behavior and Perceived HIV Risk Among HIV-Negative Members of Serodiscordant Couples in East Africa. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(7):2082–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR, Baeten JM, Curran K, Koechlin F, Amico KR, et al. Defining success with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a prevention-effective adherence paradigm. AIDS. 2015;29(11):1277–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baeten JM, Palanee-Phillips T, Mgodi NM, Mayo A, Nel A, Rosenberg Z, et al. High uptake and reduced HIV-1 incidence in an open-label trial of the dapivirine ring. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2018 (CROI 2018); 2018 Mar 4; Boston, Massachusetts.

  44. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, Brantley J, Bangsberg DR, Haberer JE, et al. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(3):340–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Eunice K. Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD089843). RH was supported by a career mentoring award from the NIMH (K24MH123371). JV was supported by the NIAID of the NIH (grant T32 AI007140-42) and by a career development award from the NIMH (K99 MH123369). RMS was supported by an NIH institutional training grant (T32AI007140). JMB is an employee of Gilead Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Renee Heffron acquired funding for the study. Renee Heffron, Andrew Mujugira, Jared Baeten, and Connie Celum contributed to the study conception and design. Jade Boyer managed study operations. Gabrielle Stein and Randy Stalter managed data collection. Andrew Mujugira, Timothy Muwonge, Olivia Nampewo, Josephine Badaru, and Timothy Ssebuliba managed study operations. Data analysis was performed by Jennifer Velloza. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jennifer Velloza and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Velloza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval:

Protocols were approved by ethical review boards at the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology and the University of Washington. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Consent to participate:

All participants ≥ 18 years provided written informed consent in their preferred language. Participants 16–17 years old who were emancipated or mature minors provided written informed consent for participation or provided assent while a parent/guardian provided informed consent in their preferred language.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velloza, J., Mujugira, A., Muwonge, T. et al. A novel “HIV salience and Perception” scale is associated with PrEP dispensing and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda. AIDS Behav 27, 279–289 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03762-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03762-x

Keywords

Navigation