Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-level Factors Driving Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Non-initiation Among Young Women at High Risk for HIV in Kenya

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have focused on understanding pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) non-initiation among young, high-risk women in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to qualitatively explore why young women in Kenya at high-risk for HIV chose not to enroll in a PrEP adherence trial. We performed 40 semi-structured interviews with young high-risk women assessing concerns about PrEP and/or study participation. We also assessed community-level factors influencing decision-making around PrEP through 10 focus groups involving peers, young men, caregivers, and community leaders. Our qualitative data reflect the complexity of navigating barriers preventing PrEP initiation in settings where taking PrEP may be perceived as immoral behavior. Framed within the context of risk perception, the decision to start PrEP may run counter to the potential risk of losing support from one’s community. Our findings suggest that approaches addressing social norms, while de-medicalizing HIV prevention services, are needed to further increase PrEP uptake among young Kenyan women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study cannot be made publicly available to maintain participant confidentiality.

References

  1. UN Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Global AIDS update 2019—communities at the centre. 2019. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2019/2019-global-AIDS-update. Accessed 3 Sept 2019.

  2. Richardson ET, Collins SE, Kung T, et al. Gender inequality and HIV transmission: a global analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19035. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wood K, Maforah F, Jewkes R. “He forced me to love him”: putting violence on adolescent sexual health agendas. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(2):233–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stockman JK, Lucea MB, Campbell JC. Forced sexual initiation, sexual intimate partner violence and HIV risk in women: a global review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(3):832–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0361-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Celum CL, Delany-Moretlwe S, McConnell M, et al. Rethinking HIV prevention to prepare for oral PrEP implementation for young African women. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):20227. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.4.20227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scully EP. Sex differences in HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(2):136–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-018-0383-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karim SSA, Baxter C. HIV incidence rates in adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(11):e1470–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30404-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sidebottom D, Ekström AM, Strömdahl S. A systematic review of adherence to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV—how can we improve uptake and adherence? BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):581. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3463-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchbinder SP. Maximizing the benefits of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis. Top Antivir Med. 2018;25(4):138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nunn AS, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Oldenburg CE, et al. Defining the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum. AIDS. 2017;31(5):731–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000001385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haberer JE. Current concepts for PrEP adherence in the PrEP revolution: from clinical trials to routine practice. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/coh.0000000000000220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kenya Ministry of Health. Kenya HIV prevention revolution road map: count down to 2030. Kenya Ministry of Health. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Kenya_HIV_Prevention_Revolution_Road_Map.pdf. Accessed 19 Sept 2020.

  13. Cowan FM, Delany-Moretlwe S, Sanders EJ, et al. PrEP implementation research in Africa: what is new? J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(7(Suppl 6)):21101. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.7.21101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glynn JR, Carael M, Auvert B, et al. Why do young women have a much higher prevalence of HIV than young men? A study in Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia. AIDS. 2001;15(Suppl 4):S51-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1202614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer KH, Maslankowski LA, Gai F, et al. Safety and tolerability of tenofovir vaginal gel in abstinent and sexually active HIV-infected and uninfected women. AIDS. 2006;20(4):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000210608.70762.c3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilgrim N, Jani N, Mathur S, et al. Provider perspectives on PrEP for adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: the role of provider biases and quality of care. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0196280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Straten A, Stadler J, Luecke E, et al. Perspectives on use of oral and vaginal antiretrovirals for HIV prevention: the VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(3 Suppl 2):19146. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.3.19146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Straten A, Stadler J, Montgomery E, et al. Women’s experiences with oral and vaginal pre-exposure prophylaxis: the VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2): e89118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amico KR, Wallace M, Bekker LG, et al. Experiences with HPTN 067/ADAPT study-provided open-label PrEP among women in Cape Town: facilitators and barriers within a mutuality framework. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1361–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1458-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Corneli A, Perry B, McKenna K, et al. Participants’ explanations for nonadherence in the FEM-PrEP clinical trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(4):452–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Camlin CS, Koss CA, Getahun M, et al. Understanding demand for PrEP and early experiences of PrEP use among young adults in rural Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(7):2149–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02780-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nel A, Van Niekerk N, Van Baelen B, et al. Safety, adherence, and HIV-1 seroconversion among women using the dapivirine vaginal ring (DREAM): an open-label, extension study. Lancet HIV. 2021;8(2):e77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3018(20)30300-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National AIDS Control Council. The Kenya HIV estimates dashboard. Nairobi: National AIDS Control Council; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haberer JE, Bukusi EA, Mugo NR, et al. Effect of SMS reminders on PrEP adherence in young Kenyan women (MPYA study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2021;8(3):e130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3018(20)30307-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Balkus JE, Brown E, Palanee T, et al. An empiric HIV risk scoring tool to predict HIV-1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(3):333–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Denzin NK. Sociological methods: a sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katz IT, Dietrich J, Tshabalala G, et al. Understanding treatment refusal among adults presenting for HIV-testing in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(4):704–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0920-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Curran K, Ngure K, Shell-Duncan B, et al. ‘If I am given antiretrovirals I will think I am nearing the grave’: Kenyan HIV serodiscordant couples’ attitudes regarding early initiation of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2014;28(2):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000000025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Geng EH, Bwana MB, Muyindike W, et al. Failure to initiate antiretroviral therapy, loss to follow-up and mortality among HIV-infected patients during the pre-ART period in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(2):e64-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828af5a6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahn TR, Desmond M, Rao D, et al. Delayed initiation of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-discordant couples in Kenya. AIDS Care. 2013;25(3):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.712660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Katz IT, Bangsberg DR. Cascade of refusal-what does it mean for the future of treatment as prevention in sub-Saharan Africa? Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016;13(2):125–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-016-0309-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Flay B, Snyder F, Petraitis J. The theory of triadic influence. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, editors. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vansteenkiste M, Sheldon KM. There’s nothing more practical than a good theory: integrating motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006;45(Pt 1):63–82. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X34192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware NC, Wyatt MA, Asiimwe S, et al. How home HIV testing and counselling with follow-up support achieves high testing coverage and linkage to treatment and prevention: a qualitative analysis from Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20929. https://doi.org/10.7448/ias.19.1.20929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shrestha R, Altice FL, Huedo-Medina TB, Karki P, Copenhaver M. Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): an empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model among high-risk drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1650-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gilbert HN, Wyatt MA, Pisarski EE, et al. PrEP discontinuation and prevention-effective adherence: experiences of PrEP users in Ugandan HIV serodiscordant couples. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(3):265–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000002139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Katz IT, Bogart LM, Cloete C, et al. Understanding HIV-infected patients’ experiences with PEPFAR-associated transitions at a Centre of Excellence in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2015;27(10):1298–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1051502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Katz IT, Ybarra ML, Wyatt MA, Kiwanuka JP, Bangsberg DR, Ware NC. Socio-cultural and economic antecedents of adolescent sexual decision-making and HIV-risk in rural Uganda. AIDS Care. 2013;25(2):258–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.701718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Patton MQ, editor. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. SAGE Publishing; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dedoose Version 8.0.35. SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.; 2018. https://www.dedoose.com/.

  48. Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tesfay F, Javanparast S, Mwanri L, Ziersch A. Stigma and discrimination: barriers to the utilisation of a nutritional program in HIV care services in the Tigray region, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):904. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09040-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(3):214–22. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. Docklands: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hennink MM, Inge H, Ajay B. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Renz SM, Carrington JM, Badger TA. Two strategies for qualitative content analysis: an intramethod approach to triangulation. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(5):824–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hill LM, Maseko B, Chagomerana M, et al. HIV risk, risk perception, and PrEP interest among adolescent girls and young women in Lilongwe, Malawi: operationalizing the PrEP cascade. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. HPTN 084 Study Demonstrates Superiority of CAB LA to Oral FTC/TDF for the Prevention of HIV. HIV Prevention Trials Network 2020. https://www.hptn.org/news-and-events/press-releases/hptn-084-study-demonstrates-superiority-of-cab-la-to-oral-ftctdf-for.

  56. Golub SA. PrEP stigma: implicit and explicit drivers of disparity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(2):190–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-018-0385-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Calabrese SK, Underhill K. How stigma surrounding the use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis undermines prevention and pleasure: a call to destigmatize “Truvada Whores.” Am J Public Health. 2015;105(10):1960–4. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Calabrese SK. Understanding, contextualizing, and addressing PrEP stigma to enhance PrEP implementation. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(6):579–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00533-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pintye J, Beima-Sofie KM, Makabong OP, et al. HIV-uninfected Kenyan adolescent and young women share perspectives on using pre-exposure prophylaxis during pregnancy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018;32(12):538–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2018.0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Olilo WA, Petersen ML, Koss CA, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among older individuals in rural western Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(4):e50–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000002150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Patel RC, Stanford-Moore G, Odoyo J, et al. “Since both of us are using antiretrovirals, we have been supportive to each other”: facilitators and barriers of pre-exposure prophylaxis use in heterosexual HIV serodiscordant couples in Kisumu, Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):21134. https://doi.org/10.7448/ias.19.1.21134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kambutse I, Igiraneza G, Ogbuagu O. Perceptions of HIV transmission and pre-exposure prophylaxis among health care workers and community members in Rwanda. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11): e0207650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kalule Nabunya H, Nakalega R, Asiimwe Biira F, et al. Supporting adolescent girls and young women to adhere to oral PrEP; experiences of counsellors at the Kampala site. Presented at HIVR4P. 2021. https://programme.hivr4p.org/Abstract/Abstract/539.

  64. Casmir E, Daniel AK, Ongolly F, et al. Protection at first sexual intercourse among adolescent girls and young women in Kenya. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(1):219–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01785-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Norr KF, Banda CK, Jere DL, et al. Community implementation of a peer group intervention increases condom use at last sex in rural Malawi. Presented at HIVR4P. 2021. https://programme.hivr4p.org/Abstract/Abstract/709.

  66. Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, et al. Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. PrEP My Way: a novel PrEP delivery system to meet the needs of young African Women. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04408729. Accessed 9 Feb 2021.

Download references

Funding

We thank the individuals who participated in this study and the broader study team. The parent grant (MPYA) was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) under Grant R01MH109309 (PIs: Haberer and Baeten) as was the R01 Supplement that supported this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid T. Katz.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for Publication

When participants consented to the study, they also consented to have de-identified aggregated data published.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ): 32-item checklist

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katz, I.T., Ngure, K., Kamolloh, K. et al. Multi-level Factors Driving Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Non-initiation Among Young Women at High Risk for HIV in Kenya. AIDS Behav 27, 106–118 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03748-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03748-9

Keywords

Navigation