Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Use Before and After Rollout of a PrEP Program for Priority Populations in South-central Uganda

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uganda piloted HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for priority populations (sex workers, fishermen, truck drivers, discordant couples) in 2017. To assess facilitators and barriers to PrEP uptake and adherence, we explored perceptions of PrEP before and experiences after rollout among community members and providers in south-central Uganda. We conducted 75 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions. We analyzed transcripts using a team-based thematic framework approach. Partners, family, peers, and experienced PrEP users provided adherence support. Occupational factors hindered adherence for sex workers and fishermen, particularly related to mobility. Pre-rollout concerns about unskilled/untrained volunteers distributing PrEP and price-gouging were mitigated. After rollout, awareness of high community HIV risk and trust in PrEP effectiveness facilitated uptake. PrEP stigma and unexpected migration persisted as barriers. Community-initiated, tailored communication with successful PrEP users may optimize future engagement by addressing fears and rumors, while flexible delivery and refill models may facilitate PrEP continuation and adherence.

Resumen

En 2017, Uganda introdujo profilaxis pre-exposición (PrEP), dirigida a las populaciones con alto riesgo de contraer al VIH (trabajadoras sexuales, pescadores, camioneros, parejas sero-discordantes). Para investigar facilitadores y barreras para la adopción y la adherencia a la PrEP, exploramos percepciones de PrEP antes y después de su introducción en Uganda. Realizamos 75 entrevistas y 12 grupos focales con miembros de la comunidad y trabajadores de salud. Analizamos las transcripciones temáticamente usando un marco de referencia. Parejas, familias, compañeros, y clientes usando PrEP apoyaron a los demás mantener adherencia. Movilidad fue una barrera para la adherencia a la PrEP para trabajadoras sexuales y pescadores. Preocupaciones sobre el entrenamiento de los distribuidores de PrEP y la especulación de precios no fueron realizadas. Percepciones del riesgo del VIH y confianza en la eficacia de PrEP facilitaron su adopción. Estigma y migración inesperada persistieron como barreras para la adopción de PrEP. Comunicaciones manejadas por clientes usando PrEP pueden motivar interés en PrEP y abordar rumores. Sistemas flexibles del entrego y la recarga de medicinas pueden permitir continuación de, y adherencia a, la PrEP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heffron R, Ngure K, Mugo N, Celum C, Kurth A, Curran K, et al. Willingness of Kenyan HIV-1 serodiscordant couples to use antiretroviral-based HIV-1 prevention strategies. J Acquired Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61(1):116–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mack N, Evens EM, Tolley EE, Brelsford K, Mackenzie C, Milford C, et al. The importance of choice in the rollout of ARV-based prevention to user groups in Kenya and South Africa: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(3 Suppl 2):19157.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Restar AJ, Tocco JU, Mantell JE, Lafort Y, Gichangi P, Masvawure TB, et al. Perspectives on HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxes (PrEP and PEP) among female and male sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya: implications for integrating biomedical prevention into sexual health services. AIDS Educ Prev. 2017;29(2):141–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karuga RN, Njenga SN, Mulwa R, Kilonzo N, Bahati P, O’Reilley K, et al. “How I Wish This Thing Was Initiated 100 Years Ago!” Willingness to Take Daily Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Kenya. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisingerich AB, Wheelock A, Gomez GB, Garnett GP, Dybul MR, Piot PK. Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baeten JM, Heffron R, Kidoguchi L, Mugo NR, Katabira E, Bukusi EA, et al. Integrated delivery of antiretroviral treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis to HIV-1-Serodiscordant couples: a prospective implementation study in Kenya and Uganda. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heffron R, Ngure K, Odoyo J, Bulya N, Tindimwebwa E, Hong T, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa. Gates Open Res. 2017;1:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mugo PM, Sanders EJ, Mutua G, van der Elst E, Anzala O, Barin B, et al. understanding adherence to daily and intermittent regimens of oral hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(5):794–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarr M, Gueye D, Mboup A, Diouf O, Bao MDB, Ndiaye AJ, et al. Uptake, retention, and outcomes in a demonstration project of pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in public health centers in Senegal. Int J STD AIDS. 2020;31(11):1063–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koss CA, Ayieko J, Mwangwa F, Owaraganise A, Kwarisiima D, Balzer LB, et al. Early adopters of human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis in a population-based combination prevention study in rural Kenya and Uganda. Clin infect Dis. 2018;67(12):1853–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eakle R, Gomez GB, Naicker N, Bothma R, Mbogua J, Escobar MAC, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and early antiretroviral treatment among female sex workers in South Africa: Results from a prospective observational demonstration project. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawuma R, Ssemata AS, Bernays S, Seeley J. Women at high risk of HIV-infection in Kampala, Uganda, and their candidacy for PrEP. SSM Popul Health. 2021;13:100746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muwonge TR, Nsubuga R, Brown C, Nakyanzi A, Bagaya M, Bambia F, et al. Knowledge and barriers of PrEP delivery among diverse groups of potential PrEP users in Central Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0241399-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koechlin FM, Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, O’Reilly KR, Baggaley R, Grant RM, et al. Values and preferences on the use of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among multiple populations: a systematic review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1325–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yi S, Tuot S, Mwai GW, Ngin C, Chhim K, Pal K, et al. Awareness and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang LW, Grabowski MK, Ssekubugu R, Nalugoda F, Kigozi G, Nantume B, et al. Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in Rakai, Uganda: an observational epidemiological study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(8):e388–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lubega M, Nakyaanjo N, Nansubuga S, Hiire E, Kigozi G, Nakigozi G, et al. Understanding the socio-structural context of high HIV transmission in kasensero fishing community, South Western Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mafigiri R, Matovu JKB, Makumbi FE, Ndyanabo A, Nabukalu D, Sakor M, et al. HIV prevalence and uptake of HIV/AIDS services among youths (15–24 Years) in fishing and neighboring communities of Kasensero, Rakai District, South Western Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kagaayi J, Chang LW, Ssempijja V, Grabowski MK, Ssekubugu R, Nakigozi G, et al. Impact of combination HIV interventions on HIV incidence in hyperendemic fishing communities in Uganda: a prospective cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(10):e680–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kagaayi J, Batte J, Nakawooya H, Kigozi B, Nakigozi G, Strömdahl S, et al. Uptake and retention on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among key and priority populations in South-Central Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(8):e25588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bryman A, Burgess RG. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Skovdal M, Cornish F. Qualitative research for development: a guide for practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Tolley EE, Ulin PR, Mack N, Robinson ET, Succop SM. In: Jossey-Bass J, editor. Qualitative methods in public health a field guide for applied research. New York: Wiley; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nunn AS, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Oldenburg CE, Mayer KH, Mimiaga M, Patel R, et al. Defining the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum. AIDS. 2017;31(5):731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amico KR, Wallace M, Bekker L-G, Roux S, Atujuna M, Sebastian E, et al. Experiences with HPTN 067/ADAPT study-provided open-Label PrEP among women in cape town: facilitators and barriers within a mutuality framework. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1361–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshioka E, Giovenco D, Kuo C, Underhill K, Hoare J, Operario D. “I’m doing this test so I can benefit from PrEP”: exploring HIV testing barriers/facilitators and implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis among South African adolescents. African J AIDS Res. 2020;19:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Camlin CS, Koss CA, Getahun M, Owino L, Itiakorit H, Akatukwasa C, et al. Understanding demand for PrEP and early experiences of PrEP use among young adults in Rural Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(7):2149–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, Mutua G, Kuo C, Mugo P, et al. High acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2162–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Velloza J, Khoza N, Scorgie F, Chitukuta M, Mutero P, Mutiti K, et al. The influence of HIV-related stigma on PrEP disclosure and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in HPTN 082: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(3):e25463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mansergh G, Mayer K, Hirshfield S, Stephenson R, Sullivan P. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis medication sharing among HIV-negative men who have Sex with men. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(9):e2016256-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosen JG, Nakyanjo N, Isabirye D, Wawer MJ, Nalugoda F, Reynolds SJ, et al. Antiretroviral treatment sharing among highly mobile Ugandan fisherfolk living with HIV: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2020;32(7):912–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Straten A, Stadler J, Luecke E, Laborde N, Hartmann M, Montgomery ET, et al. Perspectives on use of oral and vaginal antiretrovirals for HIV prevention: the VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(32):19146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Touger R, Wood BR. A Review of telehealth innovations for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019;16(1):113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahmed N, Pike C, Bekker L-G. Scaling up pre-exposure prophylaxis in sub-Saharan Africa. Curr Opinion Infect Dis. 2019;32(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Traeger MW, Cornelisse VJ, Asselin J, Price B, Roth NJ, Willcox J, et al. Association of HIV preexposure prophylaxis with incidence of sexually transmitted infections among individuals at high risk of HIV infection. JAMA. 2019;321(14):1380–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our RHSP Social and Behavioral Science team who collected this qualitative data: Charles Ssekyawa, Dauda Isabirye, Aminah Nambuusi, Rosette Nakubulwa, and Ann Linda Namuddu. We appreciate Grace Mongo Bua who contributed to qualitative coding of several transcripts during data analysis. We also thank all study participants who graciously shared their time, thoughts, and experiences. We acknowledge research grant funding support from the US National Institute of Mental Health, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the US National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center, the JHU Center for AIDS Research, The Swedish Physicians Against AIDS Research Foundation, and the Division of Intramural Research at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. We also acknowledge the United States President’s Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which supports the provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis to Ugandans in the study region.

Funding

This research was supported by the US National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH090173, R01MH107275), the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI143333), the US National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center (D43TW010557), the JHU Center for AIDS Research (P30AI094189), the Swedish Physicians Against AIDS Research Foundation, and in part by the Division of Intramural Research at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The funders played no role in data collection, interpretation, or reporting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Field guide preparation was led by CEK, PTY, JGR, SS, and AME, with feedback from all authors. Data collection was led by WD and NN. Data analysis was performed by WD, SS, PTY, JGR, JJ, NN, AME, and CEK. Data synthesis was led by WD, PTY, and CEK, with help from co-authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WD, SS, and PTY. All authors reviewed and commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin E. Kennedy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approval was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Uganda Virus Research Institute, the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology), the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine eIRB, and the Western IRB.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ddaaki, W., Strömdahl, S., Yeh, P.T. et al. Qualitative Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators of PrEP Use Before and After Rollout of a PrEP Program for Priority Populations in South-central Uganda. AIDS Behav 25, 3547–3562 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03360-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03360-3

Keywords

Navigation