Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risky Sex in High-Risk Adolescents: Associations with Alcohol Use, Marijuana Use, and Co-Occurring Use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risky sexual behavior and substance use appear to be interconnected behaviors among adolescents, but data are scarce regarding the extent to which sexual risk behavior is associated with high levels of marijuana and alcohol use, both separately and in combination. 301 adolescents were recruited from a short-term detention facility, and substance use and risky sexual behavior were assessed. We found that adolescents who frequently used marijuana, but not alcohol, reported significantly less risky sex as well as greater intentions to use condoms than either adolescents who frequently used alcohol, but not marijuana, or adolescents who frequently used both substances. Substance use status as a predictor of future risky sexual behavior followed a similar pattern. When designing interventions to reduce substance use in the context of risky sex, it might be especially effective to target efforts toward reducing harm associated with alcohol use, either alone or in combination with marijuana use.

Resumen

El comportamiento sexual riesgoso y el uso de sustancias parecen ser comportamientos interconectados entre los adolescentes, pero son escasos los datos con respecto al grado hasta el cual el comportamiento sexual riesgoso  está asociado  con altos niveles de consumo de marihuana y alcohol, tanto por separado como en combinación. Se reclutó a 301 adolescentes de un centro de detención a corto plazo y se evaluó el uso de sustancias y el comportamiento sexual riesgoso. Encontramos que los adolescentes que usaban con frecuencia marihuana, pero no alcohol, reportaron relaciones sexuales significativamente menos riesgosas así como mayores intenciones de usar condones que adolescentes que usaban alcohol con frecuencia, pero no marihuana, o adolescentes que usaban con frecuencia ambas sustancias. El estado de uso de sustancias como predictor de futuros comportamientos sexuales riesgosos mostró un patrón similar. Al diseñar intervenciones para reducir el uso de sustancias en el contexto de las relaciones sexuales de riesgo, podría ser especialmente eficaz centrarse en los esfuerzos para reducir el daño asociado con el consumo de alcohol, solo o en combinación con el consumo de marihuana.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a logistic regression controlling for intervention condition and the same covariates, baseline substance use group did not predict whether or not participants reported having had sex in the past 3 months.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). HIV among youth. 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/youth/index.html.

  2. Teplin L, Mericle A, McClelland G, Abram K. HIV and AIDS risk behaviors in juvenile detainees: implications for public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):906–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Armour J, Hammond S. Minority youth in the juvenile justice system: disproportionate minority contact. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislators; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ritchwood TD, Ford H, DeCoster J, Lochman JE, Sutton M. Risky sexual behavior and substance use among adolescents: a meta-analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2015;52:74–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use: 1975–2014: overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hopfer C. Implications of marijuana legalization for adolescent substance use. Subst Abus. 2014;35(4):331–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Montanaro E, Ewing SWF, Bryan AD. What works? An empirical perspective on how to retain youth in longitudinal HIV and substance risk reduction studies. Subst Abus. 2014;36(4):493–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Teplin LA, Abram K, McClelland G, Mericle A, Dulcan M, Washburn D. Psychiatric disorders of youth in detention. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Juvenile Justice Bulletin; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Teplin LA, Abram KM, Washburn JJ, Welty LJ, Hershfield JA, Dulcan MK. Northwestern juvenile project: overview. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hingson R, Strunin L, Berlin B, Heeren T. Beliefs about AIDS, use of alcohol and drugs, and unprotected sex among Massachusetts adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(3):295–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo J, Chung I-J, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Abbott RD. Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(4):354–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kingree J, Braithwaite R, Woodring T. Unprotected sex as a function of alcohol and marijuana use among adolescent detainees. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27:179–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kingree J, Betz H. Risky sexual behavior in relation to marijuana and alcohol use among African-American, male adolescent detainees and their female partners. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;72(2):197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchwood TD, DeCoster J, Metzger IW, Bolland JM, Danielson CK. Does it really matter which drug you choose? An examination of the influence of type of drug on type of risky sexual behavior. Addict Behav. 2016;60:97–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons JS, Maisto SA, Wray TB. Sexual risk taking among young adult dual alcohol and marijuana users. Addict Behav. 2010;35(5):533–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Archive The National Juvenile Court Data. Juvenile court statistics 2009. Pittsburgh: National Center for Juvenile Justice; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bryan A, Rocheleau CA, Robbins RN, Hutchinson KE. Condom use among high-risk adolescents: testing the influence of alcohol use on the relationship of cognitive correlates of behavior. Health Psychol. 2017;24(2):133–42. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bryan AD, Schmiege SJ, Magnan RE. Marijuana use and risky sexual behavior among high-risk adolescents: trajectories, risk factors, and event-level relationships. Dev Psychol. 2012;48(5):1429–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmiege SJ, Bryan AD. Heterogeneity in the impact of marijuana use and alcohol use on risky sexual behavior among justice-involved youth: a regression mixture modeling approach. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(4):821–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosengard C, Stein LAR, Barnett NP, Monti PM, Golembeske C, Lebeau-Craven R. Co-occurring sexual risk and substance use behaviors among incarcerated adolescents. J Correct Health Care. 2006;12(4):279–87. doi:10.1177/1078345806296169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Skeem JL, Scott E, Mulvey EP. Justice policy reform for high-risk juveniles: using science to achieve large-scale crime reduction. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:709–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Callahan TJ, Montanaro E, Magnan RE, Bryan AD. Project MARS: design of a multi-behavior intervention trial for justice-involved youth. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(1):122–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, Zhao Z, Elwood WN, Gordon C, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12(3):199–213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmiege SJ, Broaddus MR, Levin M, Bryan AD. Randomized trial of group interventions to reduce HIV/STD risk and change theoretical mediators among detained adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back. In: Measuring alcohol consumption. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 41–72.

  26. Bryan A, Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Tests of the mediational role of preparatory safer sexual behavior in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol. 2002;21(1):71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bryan A, Aiken LS, West SG. HIV/STD risk among incarcerated adolescents: optimism about the future and self-esteem as predictors of condom use self-efficacy. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(5):912–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubin R. US prisons missing opportunities to tackle HIV in inmates. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1041–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryan AD, Aiken LS, West SG. Young women’s condom use: the influence of acceptance of sexuality, control over the sexual encounter, and perceived susceptibility to common STDs. Health Psychol. 1997;16(5):468–79. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.5.468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryan A, Schindeldecker MS, Aiken LS. Sexual self-control and male condom-use outcome beliefs: predicting heterosexual men’s condom-use intentions and behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;31(9):1911–38. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00210.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Broaddus MR, Schmiege SJ, Bryan AD. An expanded model of the temporal stability of condom use intentions: gender-specific predictors among high-risk adolescents. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(1):99–110. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9266-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Robertson AA, Stein JA, Baird-Thomas C. Gender differences in the prediction of condom use among incarcerated juvenile offenders: testing the information-motivation-behavior skills (IMB) model. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(1):18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmiege SJ, Levin ME, Bryan AD. Regression mixture models of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among criminally-involved adolescents. Prev Sci. 2009;10(4):335–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats13/surv2013-print.pdf.

  35. Schmiege SJ, Bryan AD. Heterogeneity in the relationship of substance use to risky sexual behavior among justice-involved youth: a regression mixture modeling approach. AIDS Behav. 2015;20(4):821–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lane SD, Yechiam E, Busemeyer JR. Application of a computational decision model to examine acute drug effects on human risk taking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;14(2):254–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moss HB, Chen CM, Yi H. Early adolescent patterns of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana polysubstance use and young adult substance use outcomes in a nationally representative sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. Elsevier. 2014;136:51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacobus J, Squeglia LM, Bava S, Tapert SF. White matter characterization of adolescent binge drinking with and without co-occurring marijuana use: a 3-year investigation. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2013;214(3):374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobus J, McQueeny T, Bava S, Schweinsburg BC, Frank LR, Yang TT, et al. White matter integrity in adolescents with histories of marijuana use and binge drinking. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2009;31(6):349–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobus J, Squeglia LM, Sorg SF, Nguyen-Louie TT, Tapert SF. Cortical thickness and neurocognition in adolescent marijuana and alcohol users following 28 days of monitored abstinence. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(5):729–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Schweinsburg AD, Schweinsburg BC, Nagel BJ, Eyler LT, Tapert SF. Neural correlates of verbal learning in adolescent alcohol and marijuana users. Addiction. 2011;106(3):564–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. De Sousa Fernandes Perna EB, Theunissen EL, Kuypers KPC, Toennes SW, Ramaekers JG. Subjective aggression during alcohol and cannabis intoxication before and after aggression exposure. Psychopharmacology. 2016;233(18):3331–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Romano E, Torres-Saavedra P, Voas RB, Lacey JH. Drugs and alcohol: their relative crash risk. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(1):56–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. McCormick M, Abrams, DI, Alegria M, Checkley W, Collins RL, Cooper Z, Du Plessis AJ, Feldstein Ewing SW, Hennessy S, Hutchison K, Kaminski NE, Patel S, Piomelli D, Sidney S, Wallace RB, Williams JW. Committee on the Health Effects of Marijuana: an evidence review and research agenda. The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: the current state of evidence and recommendations for research. A Report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017.

  45. Saunders J, Aasland O, Babor T. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stephens R, Roffman R, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(5):898–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from NIH/NIAAA (Grant Number 2R01AA013844) to Angela Bryan. We would like to thank Jairo Ramos for his help with the Spanish translation of our abstract.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arielle S. Gillman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Arielle Gillman, Elizabeth Yeater, Sarah Feldstein Ewing, Alberta Kong, and Angela Bryan declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gillman, A.S., Yeater, E.A., Feldstein Ewing, S.W. et al. Risky Sex in High-Risk Adolescents: Associations with Alcohol Use, Marijuana Use, and Co-Occurring Use. AIDS Behav 22, 1352–1362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1900-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1900-9

Keywords

Palabras clave

Navigation