Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Food education as food literacy: privatized and gendered food knowledge in contemporary Japan

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes politics of food education in Japan where food education has become one of the central motifs of food policy in recent years. It describes the emergence of private enterprise institutions that offer credentials for people as “food education experts,” the majority of whom are women. Based on a survey of more than one hundred food education experts, the paper explores motivations of these women and finds that the reasons for the popularity of food education certifications are not so much that women wanted to challenge the dominant food system—as agrofood scholars may have expected or hoped for—but for reasons related more to the gendered career expectations and pressures for women to conform to a culturally-scripted feminine ideal. The paper’s importance beyond Japan lies in the discussion of dynamics and implications of privatization of food education. “Privatization” indicates a shift in the location of control and in what is considered to be “necessary” knowledge about food. Subject to market logic, food education is at risk of becoming an exercise of superficial mastering of “sanitized” information. Furthermore, at the core of privatization of food education is an increasingly pervasive approach to food education that I term “food literacy” approach, based upon a deficiency framework which posits individual knowledge and skills as sole reasons for inappropriate food choices, dietary behaviors, and culinary practices. Not only is the food literacy approach highly individualistic and apolitical, but it also enables and exacerbates the privatization and gendered pressures of food education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is commonly known as “mad cow disease.” BSE-contaminated product is linked to human brain disorder called Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease (vCJD) (USDA 2005). Genetically modified crops or genetically engineered crops refer to crops developed by recombinant DNA techniques (USDA 2007). Recombinant bovine growth hormone is protein hormone injected in dairy cow to increase milk production (FDA 2009).

  2. See the Slow Food website at http://slowfood.com.

  3. The Japanese government proclaimed the 19th of every month to be Food Education Day.

  4. 5-A-Day was changed to Fruits & Veggies-More Matters campaign (see http://www.5aday.gov/ and http://www.fruitsandveggiesmatter.gov/) which is also a private–public partnership.

  5. Indeed, their website, http://dole5aday.com, prominently features Dole logos and product pictures. This website redirects viewers the dole.com superkids site and its new “SuperKids” campaign, which is then linked to the Dole Corporate Social Reliability website at http://dolecsr.com/.

  6. For instance, according to Martin and Severson (2008), organic products are typically 20–100% more expensive than their conventional counterparts in the US.

  7. See http://www.growingpower.org.

  8. Since 2002, various instances of false labeling were uncovered, from chicken to fresh vegetables. The most prevalent infractions were falsified labels on imported food products that claimed to be of domestic origin. The social impact of the scandals was significant, because there were major food players ranging from the Japan Agricultural Cooperatives to large food manufacturing corporations found to have falsified their labels. For instance, Zen-noh (The National Federation of Agricultural Co-operative Associations) was involved in falsely claiming that imported meat was domestic. One of the large meat and dairy companies, Snow Brand, was also found to have falsified its labels and was forced to go out of business.

  9. The Plan set nine goals for the 5 year period (2006–2011) (1) increasing the number citizens who are interested in food education from 70 to 90%; (2) decreasing the rate of children who do not have breakfast from 4 to 0%; (3) increasing the percentage of local food used in school lunches from 21% to more than 30%; (4) increasing the proportion of citizens who follow the Dietary Balance Guide to more than 60%; (5) increasing the number of citizens who are aware of metabolic syndromes to more than 80%; (6) increasing the number of citizens having proper basic knowledge about food safety to 60%; (7) increasing the number of volunteers involved in food education by 20%; (8) increasing the number of municipalities which have educational farms to more than 60%, and increasing the proportion of citizens who have basic knowledge on food safety to more than 60%; and (9) increasing the number of prefectures and municipalities that have food education promotion plans to 100 and 50%, respectively (Cabinet Office, n.d.).

  10. See http://www.mixi.jp.

  11. Although there is no complete guarantee that these people hold the certifications that they claim on Mixi, I only contacted people who had had previously posted messages in the communities that indicated that they had studied and obtained certifications. It is also possible for Mixi members to disguise their true identity, but the difficulty of validating respondents’ claims would not exceed that in survey research.

  12. I also conducted an interview with three members of Mixi who have one FEL food education certification. The interviewees belonged to a local group under the national organization of people who have this particular food education certification. The organization undertakes social events and study groups and refers its members to possible career opportunities. One of my respondents was the leader of the group, and all three were women. The interview was conducted in summer 2009, in Japanese. It lasted about 3 h at the home of one of the interviewees.

  13. Broadly speaking, there are three categories of occupational certifications in Japan. “Government” certifications guarantee occupational prestige and include certifications such as accountant, medical doctor, architect, preschool teacher, and Business Information Administrator. The second category is “private” certifications issued by private organizations and companies. Examples include: stock analyst, jewelry analyst, and bookkeeping. Between these two levels is the third called “public” certifications whose certification criteria are approved by the related governmental agencies or are issued by quasi-public organizations such as the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Trade. This includes English, Secretarial Ability which are approved by the Ministry of Education, Consumer Life Adviser approved by the Ministry of Commerce, and Japanese dressmaking approved by the Chamber of Commerce (Aoshima 1997, pp. 22–23). Food education certifications are private certifications, while more traditional certifications such as registered dietician and licensed cook are government certifications.

  14. An exception here is Food Education Leader which was founded with the support from a major health food and dietary supplement company, Miki Corporation.

  15. Instead of listing the percentage of daily allowance, Japanese labels simply state a particular nutrient’s absolute amount. Some have criticized that this labeling makes it more difficult for consumers to understand how much is too much.

  16. Complex Pollution was a book published in the 1970s that exposed the impacts of environmental pollution. It is widely read and influential.

  17. Miki Corporation, which sells health food and dietary supplements, holds various workshops and seminars on the topic of food’s health impacts. Respondents who raised Miki as the factor for their interests in food education tended to link it with health awareness and appreciation of health issues. For example, one woman wrote “I learned from Miki that health depends upon food.”

  18. By the bee problem, the respondent referred to the issue of ecological interdependence among insects and food crops that was discussed by one of the lecturers.

  19. Private organizations can draw the lines because the government has not provided any concrete definition of “food education,” even in the Food Education Law.

  20. Of course this view is not limited to individuals in Japan. Domestic food preparation has historically been a female responsibility in Euro-American societies (see Counihan 2004). In the US, a study of dual-earning couples in 1993 found that 87% of women and 18% of men said they took major responsibility for shopping; and 81% of women and 15% of men said they did so for cooking (cited in Kim 2009). Another study conducted in 2002 however found that among American dual-earner couples with children, 77% of women took greater responsibility for cooking (Bond et al. 2002). In their study of France, Norway, UK, the Netherlands, and the US, Warde et al. (2007) found that “while everywhere hugely disproportionate amounts of time are invested by women everywhere,” (p. 373) the gap is receding slowly.

  21. This tendency is not limited to my survey respondents. For instance, a survey by the Kanagawa Prefectural government found that 93.3% of women were worried about food compared with 85.1% of men (Kanagawa Prefectural Government 2007).

  22. “Shockers” is meant to be a pun of “shoku” (food) and the word “shock.”

  23. See http://www.shokugaku.net.

  24. According to Rose (1999), neoliberalism seeks to govern not through society but through the regulated choices of individual citizens. That is, neoliberal governmentality shifts the responsibility of caring about self from the public to the private realm. By putting the responsibility of food system reform on individuals rather than the government, a food literacy approach ought to be situated in the growth of such neoliberal subjectivity.

  25. However, its common usage is still framed in terms of individual behavior and information use. For instance, in the US government report, Health People 2010, it is defined as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions.” See http://nnlm.gov/outreach/consumer/hlthlit.html.

  26. While readers might consider Japanese society to be much more patriarchal than the Western societies, the gendered assignment of food-related domestic tasks is nonetheless present in seemingly more the “gender conscious” West. See footnote 16.

Abbreviations

FDA:

US Food and Drug Administration

FEL:

Food Education Leader Program

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

References

  • Aeon Inc. n.d. Aeon no Shokuiku Katsudo (Aeon’s food education activities). http://www.aeon.jp/with/life/shokuiku/undo/index.html. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Allen, P., and C. Sachs. 2007. Women and food chains: The gendered politics of food. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima, Y. 1997. Jenda baransu eno chosen: josei ga shikaku o ikasu niwa (Towards Gender Balances: How Women Can Utilize Certifications). Tokyo: Gakubun Sya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun Newspaper. 2005. Shokuiku chosa deta saisyukei (Food education final data). 6 September.

  • Baker, E., M. Schootman, E. Barnidge, and C. Kelly. 2006. The role of race and poverty in access to foods that enable individuals to adhere to dietary guidelines. Preventing Chronic Disease 3(3): A76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., and G. Valentine. 1997. Consuming geographies: We are where we eat. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J., C. Thompson, E. Galinsky, and D. Prottas. 2002. Highlights of the national study of the changing workforce, No. 3. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: Social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burros, M. 2009.Obamas to plant vegetable garden at White House. The New York Times. 19 March.

  • Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. 2009. Todofuken Shichoson no Shokuiku Suishinkeikaku Sakusei Jokyo (The situation of creation of food education promotional plans by municipalities). http://www8.cao.go.jp/syokuiku/work/work/keikaku_sakusei.html. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Director General for Cohesive Society. n.d. Shokuiku ni Tsuite (On food education). http://www8.cao.go.jp/syokuiku/about/index.html. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Counihan, C. 2004. Around the Tuscan table: food, family, and gender in twentieth-century Florence. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, L., and A. Ferguson. 1999. Is this a woman’s movement? The relationship of gender to community-supported agriculture in Michigan. Human Organization 58: 190–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, M. 2000. Not in my body: rBGH and the rise of organic milk. Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fackler, M. 2007. Safe food for Japan. The New York Times. 11 October.

  • Food and Drug Administration. 2009. Report on the food and drug administration’s review of the safety of recombinant bovine somatotropin. Washington, DC: FDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. In Vintage, ed. Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuji Sankei Business News. 2009. Shokugyojin: Food Discovery Fukui Eiji Shi (Working people: Food Discovery’s Mr. Eji Fukui). 23 March.

  • Glanz, K., M. Basil, E. Maiback, J. Goldberg, and D. Snyder. 1998. Why Americans eat what they do: taste nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 98: 1118–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2003. Fast food/organic food: Reflexive tastes and the making of `yuppie chow’. Journal of Social and Cultural Geography 4: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39: 1171–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M., and L. Busch. 2008. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis 48(1): 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Food, Health, Culture Association. 2009. News release. April 20, 2009. http://prw.kyodonews.jp/open/release.do?r=200904202350. Accessed 10 Aug 2009.

  • Jaffe, D. 2007. Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, J., and M. Gertler. 2006. Victual vicissitudes: Consumer deskilling and the (gendered) transformation of food systems. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanagawa Prefectural Government, Environment and Agricultural Division. 2007. Shokuiku Ishiki Cyosa (Food education awareness survey). http://www.pref.kanagawa.jp/osirase/05/0513/syokuiku/tyosa07/houkoku.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Kerton, S., and A. Sinclair. 2009. Buying local organic food: A pathway to transformative learning. Agriculture and Human Values (forthcoming).

  • Kim, H. 2009. Analyzing the gender division of labor: The cases of the United States and South Korea. Asian Perspective 33(2): 181–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, A.H., and M. Nishiyama. 2008. The chisan-chisho movement: Japanese local food movement and its challenges. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, A.H. Uncovering hidden hunger: Nutritionalization in Indonesia. Book manuscript.

  • Kleinman, D.L. 2000. Democratizations of science and technology. In Science, technology and democracy, ed. D.L. Kleinman, 139–163. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. 2008. School lunch politics: The surprising history of America’s favorite welfare program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. 2002. Rural geography: Rural gender identity and the performance of masculinity and femininity. Progress in Human Geography 26: 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J., B. Ilbery, and D. Watts. 2009. Gender, consumption and the relocalisation of food: A research agenda. Sociologia Ruralis 49(3): 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., and K. Severson. 2008. Sticker shock in the organic aisles. The New York Times. 18 April.

  • McDonalds, Inc. 2005. Shokuiku Saito, Shokuiku No Jikan wo Kaisetsu (Launching of food education website, Food Education Hour). http://www.mcd-holdings.co.jp/news/2005/csr/syokuiku.html. Accessed 21 May 2009.

  • Medical News Today. 2004. FDA confronts obesity problem food labels to be revised. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/6525.php. Accessed 25 February 2010.

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Japan. 2009. Syokuryo Jikyuritsu ni tsuite (On food self sufficiency). http://www.maff.go.jp/j/press/kanbo/anpo/100810.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2010.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture Sports Science and Technology. n.d. Hayane Hayaoki Asagohan Suishin Kokumin Undo no Suishin ni Tsuite (On the promotion of the national movement for early to bed, early to rise, and don’t forget your breakfast). http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shougai/asagohan/index.htm. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. 2005. White paper on working women, Tokyo, Japan.

  • Mitka, M. 2005. Government unveils new food pyramid. Journal of the American Medical Association 293(21): 2581–2582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, B.L.R. 1996. The traditional arts as leisure activities for contemporary Japanese women. In Re-imagining Japanese women, ed. A.E. Imamura, 117–134. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mos Burger, Inc. n.d. Mos no Shokuiku Proguramu (Mos’s food education programmes). http://www.mos.co.jp/company/social_activity/society/mos_kids/shokuiku/. Accessed 19 May 2009.

  • Murdoch, J., and M. Miele. 2004. A new aesthetic of food? Relational reflexivity in the alternative food movement. In Qualities of food, ed. M. Harvey, A. McMeeking, and A. Warde, 156–175. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris-Raynbird, Carla E. 2009. Focus on local food sustainability: A comparative exploration of two food co-ops in Northern Minnesota. Presented at Rural Sociological Society Annual Meeting.

  • Nutbeam, D. 2000. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication into the 21st century. Health Promotion International 15(3): 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. 2008. In defense of food. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Produce for Better Health Foundation. n.d. There is a rainbow on my plate. http://www.pbhfoundation.org/educators/teachers/rainbow/. Accessed 20 Feb 2010.

  • Riessman, C.K. 1993. Narrative analysis. New York, NY: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sankei News Paper. 2008. Shoku no Shikaku ga Josei ni Ninki (Food related certifications popular among women). 20 January.

  • Scrinis, G. 2008. On the ideology of nutritionism. Gastronomica 8(1): 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, L. 2009. Perfection salad: Women and cooking at the turn of the century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, K.J., J. Sherry, B. Winn, N. Keesecker, A. Mildred, A. Horodynski, and A. Sayir. 2008. Increasing nutrition literacy: Testing the effectiveness of print, web site, and game modalities. Society for Nutrition Education 40(1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K. 2008. Seven samurai to protect “our” food: The reform of the food safety regulatory system in Japan after the BSE crisis of 2001. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsunoda, N. 2009. 1987 nen Nyusya Joseitachi no Senryaku (Strategy by women who entered corporations in 1987). AERA Magazine, 15 March. http://www.aera-net.jp/summary/090315_000738.html. Accessed 5 Mar 2009.

  • USDA. 2005. Fact sheet: Bovine spongiform encephalopathy. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/factsheets/bovine_spongiform_encephalopathy_mad_cow_disease/index.asp. Accessed 19 Aug 2010.

  • USDA. 2007. Genetically engineered crops—Agricultural biotechnology concepts and definitions. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/biotechnology/glossary.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2010.

  • Warde, A., S. Cheng, W. Olsen, and D. Southerton. 2007. Changes in the practice of eating: A comparative analysis of time-use. Acta Sociologica 50(4): 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun Newspaper. 2008. Fuetemasu Yasai Somurie Takamaru Kanshin Syufu ra Syutoku (Growth in vegetable sommelier: increasing interests and certification by housewives), Yomiuri Shinbun. 22 December.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank staff and participants for the Food Education Leader seminars. I also thank the journal’s reviewers and its editor, Harvey James, for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aya H. Kimura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kimura, A.H. Food education as food literacy: privatized and gendered food knowledge in contemporary Japan. Agric Hum Values 28, 465–482 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9286-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9286-6

Keywords

Navigation