Abstract
Diagnosing begins by generating an initial diagnostic hypothesis by automatic information processing. Information processing may stop here if the hypothesis is accepted, or analytical processing may be used to refine the hypothesis. This description portrays analytic processing as an optional extra in information processing, leading us to questions if it actually contributes to diagnostic performance, and whether it heralds expertise or a lack of expertise. When we encourage students to solve problems using analytic processing—as is our teaching tradition—are we helping or hindering diagnostic performance and the evolution of expertise? The relationship between information processing, expertise and diagnostic performance is complex. At least four additional variables affect this relationship: context; task difficulty; clinical domain; and experimental conditions. Therefore, we cannot make a generic statement about the relationship between processing, expertise and performance—we can only say that when given a problem containing certain information, of certain difficulty, in a certain clinical domain and under certain experimental conditions, analytic processing appears to improve diagnostic performance and be a feature of expertise. No single processing strategy is a panacea. Training students in both automatic and analytic processing offers flexibility in information processing and better prepares them for the wide variety of problems that they may encounter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, S. W., Brooks, L. R., Norman, G. R., & Rosenthal, D. (1988). Effect of prior examples on rule-based diagnostic performance. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, 27, 9–14.
Ark, T. K., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K. W. (2006). Giving learners the best of both worlds: Do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Academic Medicine, 81, 405–409.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 153–184.
Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coderre, S., Mandin, H., Harasym, P. H., & Fick, G. H. (2004). Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education, 37, 695–703.
Custers, E. J., Boshuizen, H. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996a). The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates. Memory and Cognition, 24, 384–399.
Custers, E. J., Regehr, G., & Norman, G. R. (1996b). Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: A review. Academic Medicine, 71, S55–S61.
Eva, K. W. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39, 98–106.
Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In H. G. Schmidt & M. L. de Volers (Eds.), Tutorials in problem-based learning: a new direction in teaching the health professions. Assen, Holland: van Gorcum.
Gilhooly, K. J., McGeorge, P., Hunter, J., Rawles, J. M., Kirby, I. K., Green, C., & Wynn, V. (1997). Biomedical knowledge in diagnostic thinking: The case of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–223.
Hatala, R., Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1999). Impact of a clinical scenario on accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 126–129.
Hobus, P. P., Schmidt, H. G., Boshuizen, H. P., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Contextual factors in the activation of first diagnostic hypotheses: Expert-novice differences. Medical Education, 21, 471–476.
Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2004). Using comprehensive feature lists to bias medical diagnosis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 563–572.
Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing X-ray pictures. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mandin, H., Jones, A., Woloschuk, W., & Harasym, P. (1997). Helping students learn to think like experts when solving clinical problems. Academic Medicine, 72, 173–179.
McLaughlin, K. (2007). The contribution of analytic information processing to diagnostic performance in medicine. Ph.D. thesis. Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits to our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Feightner, J. W., & Barrows, H. S. (1981). Clinical problem-solving by medical students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Medical Education, 15, 315–322.
Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1997). The non-analytical basis of clinical reasoning. Advances in Health Science Education, 2, 173–184.
Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., & Allen, S. W. (1989). Recall by expert medical practitioners and novices as a record of processing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1166–1174.
Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Colle, C., & Hatala, R. (1999). The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning: Experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 433–448.
Norman, G. R., Trott, A. D., Brooks, L. R., & Smith, E. K. M. (1994). Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 114–120.
Olsen, J. R., & Rueter, H. H. (1987). Extracting expertise from experts: Methods for knowledge acquisition. Expert Systems, 4, 152–168.
Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Groen, G. J. (1989). Reconciling basic science and clinical reasoning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 1, 116–121.
Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., & Scott, H. M. (1988). Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students. Medical Education, 22, 398–406.
Patel, V., & Groen, G. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 205–221.
Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implication. Academic Medicine, 65, 611–621.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
Verkoeijen, P. P., Rikers, R. M., Schmidt, H. G., van de Wiel, M. W., & Kooman, J. P. (2004). Case representation by medical experts, intermediates and novices for laboratory data presented with or without a clinical context. Medical Education, 38, 617–627.
Woods, N. N., Brooks, L., & Norman, G. (2005). The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Medical Education, 39, 107–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLaughlin, K., Rikers, R.M. & Schmidt, H.G. Is analytic information processing a feature of expertise in medicine?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 123–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9080-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9080-4