Skip to main content
Log in

Is analytic information processing a feature of expertise in medicine?

  • Reflections
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnosing begins by generating an initial diagnostic hypothesis by automatic information processing. Information processing may stop here if the hypothesis is accepted, or analytical processing may be used to refine the hypothesis. This description portrays analytic processing as an optional extra in information processing, leading us to questions if it actually contributes to diagnostic performance, and whether it heralds expertise or a lack of expertise. When we encourage students to solve problems using analytic processing—as is our teaching tradition—are we helping or hindering diagnostic performance and the evolution of expertise? The relationship between information processing, expertise and diagnostic performance is complex. At least four additional variables affect this relationship: context; task difficulty; clinical domain; and experimental conditions. Therefore, we cannot make a generic statement about the relationship between processing, expertise and performance—we can only say that when given a problem containing certain information, of certain difficulty, in a certain clinical domain and under certain experimental conditions, analytic processing appears to improve diagnostic performance and be a feature of expertise. No single processing strategy is a panacea. Training students in both automatic and analytic processing offers flexibility in information processing and better prepares them for the wide variety of problems that they may encounter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. W., Brooks, L. R., Norman, G. R., & Rosenthal, D. (1988). Effect of prior examples on rule-based diagnostic performance. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, 27, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ark, T. K., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K. W. (2006). Giving learners the best of both worlds: Do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Academic Medicine, 81, 405–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coderre, S., Mandin, H., Harasym, P. H., & Fick, G. H. (2004). Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education, 37, 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custers, E. J., Boshuizen, H. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996a). The influence of medical expertise, case typicality, and illness script component on case processing and disease probability estimates. Memory and Cognition, 24, 384–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custers, E. J., Regehr, G., & Norman, G. R. (1996b). Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: A review. Academic Medicine, 71, S55–S61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W. (2005). What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 39, 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In H. G. Schmidt & M. L. de Volers (Eds.), Tutorials in problem-based learning: a new direction in teaching the health professions. Assen, Holland: van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., McGeorge, P., Hunter, J., Rawles, J. M., Kirby, I. K., Green, C., & Wynn, V. (1997). Biomedical knowledge in diagnostic thinking: The case of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatala, R., Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1999). Impact of a clinical scenario on accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 126–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobus, P. P., Schmidt, H. G., Boshuizen, H. P., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Contextual factors in the activation of first diagnostic hypotheses: Expert-novice differences. Medical Education, 21, 471–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2004). Using comprehensive feature lists to bias medical diagnosis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing X-ray pictures. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandin, H., Jones, A., Woloschuk, W., & Harasym, P. (1997). Helping students learn to think like experts when solving clinical problems. Academic Medicine, 72, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K. (2007). The contribution of analytic information processing to diagnostic performance in medicine. Ph.D. thesis. Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits to our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Feightner, J. W., & Barrows, H. S. (1981). Clinical problem-solving by medical students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Medical Education, 15, 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1997). The non-analytical basis of clinical reasoning. Advances in Health Science Education, 2, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., & Allen, S. W. (1989). Recall by expert medical practitioners and novices as a record of processing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1166–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Colle, C., & Hatala, R. (1999). The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning: Experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., Trott, A. D., Brooks, L. R., & Smith, E. K. M. (1994). Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. R., & Rueter, H. H. (1987). Extracting expertise from experts: Methods for knowledge acquisition. Expert Systems, 4, 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Groen, G. J. (1989). Reconciling basic science and clinical reasoning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 1, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., & Scott, H. M. (1988). Biomedical knowledge in explanations of clinical problems by medical students. Medical Education, 22, 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V., & Groen, G. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implication. Academic Medicine, 65, 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkoeijen, P. P., Rikers, R. M., Schmidt, H. G., van de Wiel, M. W., & Kooman, J. P. (2004). Case representation by medical experts, intermediates and novices for laboratory data presented with or without a clinical context. Medical Education, 38, 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. N., Brooks, L., & Norman, G. (2005). The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Medical Education, 39, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin McLaughlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLaughlin, K., Rikers, R.M. & Schmidt, H.G. Is analytic information processing a feature of expertise in medicine?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 123–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9080-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9080-4

Keywords

Navigation