Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Canopy management practices in mulberry: impact on fine and coarse roots

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Canopy management practices viz. lopping, pruning, coppicing and pollarding in trees alter branch density, height, leaf area index and rooting pattern of the trees. The present study was conducted to quantify the impact of canopy management practices and intercropping on fine and coarse roots distribution in mulberry (Morus alba). In total, six treatments comprising of three management practices (pollarding, coppicing and lopping) and two cropping situations (intercropping and without intercropping) were evaluated. Vertical and lateral distribution of fine root biomass (FRB) was recorded through sequential core method in different seasons. Coarse root distribution and biomass was studied using excavation method. Results revealed that canopy management treatments viz., coppicing and pollarding reduced the FRB as compared to lopping treatment in both intercropped and non-intercropped situation. Results also revealed that majority of the fine root biomass (67.3%) was confined in 0–15 cm soil layer. All the canopy management treatments under non-intercropped plots showed higher production rate as compared to intercropped plots. Fine root turnover rate (yr−1) was highest (0.592) in lopping treatment in non-intercropped plots whereas, the minimum turnover rate was recorded in coppicing treatment (0.331) in non-intercropped plots. Coarse root biomass was highest in case of intercropped plots in all the three canopy management treatments. Pollarding + turmeric cultivation showed the maximum root biomass followed by lopping + turmeric intercropping treatment. The main and primary roots in all the treatments accounted for > 70% biomass except for coppicng + turmeric treatment, whereas secondary and tertiary roots contributed about 40% biomass. All the treatments showed a pronounced decrease in root biomass with increasing soil depth and 75–84% of the total root biomass (main + lateral roots) was allocated in the top 30 cm of the soil profile. From the study, it can be concluded that tree management practices have direct impact on fine and coarse root distribution and should be judiciously used for avoiding competition in intercropping situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JS (1993) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Berhongaray G, Verlinden MS, Broeckx LS, Ceulemans R (2015) Changes in belowground biomass after coppice in two Populus genotypes. For Ecol Manage 337:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brassard BW, Chen HYH, Bergeron Y (2009) Influence of environmental variability on root dynamics in northern forests. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke MK, Raynal DJ (1994) Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant Soil 162:135–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL (2000) Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia 125:389–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi OP, Das DK (2002) Studies on rooting patterns of 5-year-old important agroforestry tree species in North Bihar, India. For Trees Livelihoods 12:329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan SK, Gupta N, Ritu Yadav S, Chauhan R (2009) Biomass and carbon allocation in different parts of agroforestry tree species. Indian For 135(7):981–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang M, Wenhui Z, Min W, Yaoqin X, Liwei M, Zhou J (2013) Effect of aboveground intervention on fine root mass, production and turnover rate in a Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis Blume)forest. Plant Soil 368:201–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comas LH, Eissenstat DM, Lakso AN (2000) Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. New Phytol 147(1):171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das DK, Chaturvedi OP (2008) Root biomass and distribution of five agroforestry tree species. Agrofor Syst 74:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Tripathi RS (2000) Biomass and production of fine and coarse roots of trees under agrisilvicultural practices in north-east India. Agrofor Syst 50:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Narain P, Singh R (1990) Studies on root distribution of five multipurpose tree species in Doon Valley, India. Agrofor Syst 12:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann DI, Nguyen PV, Pregitzer KS (1996) Effects of irrigation and coppicing on above-ground growth, physiology, and fine-root dynamics of two field grown hybrid poplar clones. Forest Ecology and Management 80:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards NT, Harris WF (1977) Carbon Cycling in a Mixed Deciduous Forest Floor. Ecology 58(2):431–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Fadi MA (1997) Management of Prosopis juliflora for use in agroforestry systems in Sudan. Trop. For Rep. Helsinki 16:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994) Fine-root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook experimental forest, NH. J Ecol 82:533–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca W, Alice FE, Rey-Benayas JM (2012) Carbon accumulation in aboveground and belowground biomass and soilof different age native forest plantations in the humid tropical lowlands of Costa Rica. New For 43(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garten CT, Wullschleger SD, Classen AT (2011) Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar. Biomass Bioenerg 35:214–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill AR, Jackson RB (2000) Global patterns of root turn over for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 147:13–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations ina longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140(3):450–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmisaari HS, Makkonen K, Kellomaki S, Valtonen E, Malkonen E (2002) Below- and above-ground biomass, production andnitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manage 165(1–3):317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmisaari HS, Derome J, Nöjd P, Kukkola M (2007) Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol 27:1493–1504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993) The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northernhardwood ecosystems. Can J Forestry Res 23:2507–2520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J Ecol 84(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel D, Leuschner C (2002) A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in a Fagus-Quercus mixed forest. Plant Soil 239(2):237–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hishi T (2007) Heterogeneity of individual roots within the fine root architecture: causal links between physiological and ecosystem functions. J For Res 12(2):126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha P, Mohapatra KP (2010) Leaf litterfall, fine root production and turnover in four major tree species of the semi-arid region of India. Plant Soil 326:481–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson K, Fidjeland L, Maghembe JA, Hogberg P (1988) The vertical distribution of fine roots of five tree species and maize in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor Syst 6:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal R, Kumar A, Alam NM, Mandal D, Jayaparkash J, Tomar JMS, Patra S, Gupta AK, Mehta H, Panwar P, Chaturvedi OP, Mishra PK (2017) Effect of different canopy management practices on rainfall partitioning in Morus alba. Ecological Engineering 102:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khiewtam RS, Ramakrishnan PS (1993) Litter and fine root dynamics of a relic sacred grove forest at Cherrapunji. For Ecol Manage 60:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JS, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P (2002) Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol 154:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landhausser SM, Lieffers VJ (2012) Defoliation increases risk of carbon starvation in root systems of mature aspen. Trees Struct Funct 26(2):653–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenroth WK (2000) Methods of estimating belowground net primary production. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen K, Helmisaari HS (1998) Seasonal and yearly variations of fine-root biomass and necromass in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L) stand. For Ecol Manage 102(2–3):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen K, Helmisaari HS (1999) Assessing fine-root biomass and production in a Scots pine stand-comparison of soil core and root ingrowth core methods. Plant Soil 210:43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal D, Sharda VN, Tripathi KP (2010) Relative efficacy of two biophysical approaches to assess soil loss tolerance for Doon valley soils of India. J Soil Water Conserv 65:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClaugherty CA, Aber John D, Melillo JM (1982) The Role of Fine Roots in the Organic Matter and Nitrogen Budgets of Two Forested Ecosystems. Ecology 63(5):1481–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei L, Gu JC, Zhang ZW, Wang ZQ (2010) Responses of fine root mass, length, production and turnover to soil nitrogen fertilization in Larixgmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica forests in North eastern China. J For Res 15(3):194–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moretto AS, Distel RA, Didoné NG (2001) Decomposition and nutrient dynamic of leaf litter and roots from palatable and unpalatable grasses in a semi-arid grassland. Applied Soil Ecology 18(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EG (2004) Fineroot production dominates response of a deciduous forest toatmospheric CO2 enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9689–9693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag R, Hobbie Sarah E (1999) Early stages of root and leaf decomposition in Hawaiian forests: effects of nutrient availability. Oecologia 121(4):564–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H (2000) Adaptive tactics and characteristics of tree fine roots. Dev Plant Soil Sci 33:337–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson HÅ, Stadenberg I (2010) Fine root dynamics in a Norway spruce forest (Piceaabies (L.) Karst) in eastern Sweden. Plant Soil 330(1–2):329–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72(2):293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan X, Wang C, Zhang Q, Wang X, Luo Y (2010) Lamberty BB (2010) Dynamics of fine roots in five Chinese temperate forests. J Plant Res 123:497–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rama Kant, Chakrabarty S, Dhyani SK, Upadhayay RK (2004) Mulberry (Morus alba L.) as an Agroforestry Plant in Uttaranchal. Indian For 130(8):939–944

    Google Scholar 

  • RaizadaA Jayaprakash J, Rathore AC, Tomar JMS (2013) Distribution of fine root biomass of fruit and forest tree species raised on old river bed lands in the north west Himalaya. Trop Ecol 54(2):251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson CH, Kirkham JB, Littlewood R (1999) Decomposition of root mixtures from high arctic plants: a microcosm study. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1101–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhigwa BA, Gichuru MP, Mambani B, Tariah NM (1992) Root distribution of Acioabarteri, Alchorneacordifolia, Cassia siamea and Gmelinaarborea in an acid Ultisol. Agrofor Syst 19:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytter RM, Hansson AC (1996) Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized Salix viminalis L plantation. Biomass Bioenerg 11:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G (1995) Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and system design in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Thompson AW, Mc Groddy ME, Varner RK, Dias JD, Silva H, Crill PM, Kellers M (2005) Fine root dynamics and trace gas fluxes in two lowland tropical forest soils. Glob Change Biol 11:290–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ssekabembe CK, Henderlong PR, Larson M (1997) Effect of hedge row orientation on maize light interception in black locust alleys. Int Tree Crops J 9:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele SJ, Gower ST, Vogel JG, Norman JM (1997) Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and blackspruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Physiol 17:577–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur PS, Sehgal S (2001) Effect of canopy management on root parameters in agroforestry tree species of temperate region. Indian J Agrofor 2:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur PS, Thakur A (2007) Canopy management in agroforetsry-options and strategies. In: Puri S, Panwar P (eds) Agroforestry Systems and Practices. New India Publishing Agency, N Delhi, pp 533–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakut PS (2000) Comparative performance of multipurpose tree species growing at the degraded site. Indian Forester 124:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomar JMS, Pandey HN, Bhatt BP, Tripathi RS (2009) Growth behaviour of selected tree species under hilly ecosystems of northeast India - An expanding role in agroforestry. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 33:903–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Torquebiau EF, Kwesiga F (1996) Root development in a Sesbania sesban fallow-maize system in Eastern Zambia. Agrofor Syst 34:193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (1999) Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution, and soil respiration in a multi-species riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhaya K, Pandey HN, Law PS, Tripathi RS (2005) Dynamics of fine and coarse roots and nitrogen mineralization in a humid subtropical forest ecosystem of north east India. Biol Fert Soils 41:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma KS, Kaushal R, Sood R (2002a) Tree-crop interaction studies in agri-horti-silviculture system of agroforestry: macro-nutrients concentration and uptake in soybean. J Tree Sci 21:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma KS, Zegeye MW, Kaushal R (2002b) Growth and yield performance of wheat in agri-horti-silviculture system in the mid-hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Agrofor 4(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma KS, Kohli S, Kaushal R, Chaturvedi OP (2014) Root structure, distribution and biomass in five multipurpose tree species of Western Himalayas. J Mt Sci 11(2):519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner C, Haas E, Grote R, Gauder M, Graeff-Hönninger S, Claupein W, Butterbach-Bahl K (2012) Biomass production potential from Populus short rotation systems in Romania. GCB Bioenerg 4:642–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao CW, Sang WG, Wang RZ (2008) Fine root dynamics and turnover rate in an Asia white birch forest of Donglingshan Mountain. China For Ecol Manag 255(3–4):765–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LY, Wu ST, Zhang LB (2010) Fine root biomass dynamics and carbon storage along a successional gradient in Changbai Mountains. China For 83(4):379–387

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Director ICAR-IISWC for providing necessary facilities for carrying out this study. The help rendered by Mr. U.V.S Chauhan, STO and Mr. Ravish Kumar, TA in the field and laboratory is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Author notes

  1. R. Kaushal

    Present address: ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun, 248 195, India

  2. O. P. Chaturvedi

    Present address: ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun, 248 195, India

    J. Jayaparkash, D. Mandal, Ambrish Kumar, N. M. Alam, J. M. S. Tomar, H. Mehta & O. P. Chaturvedi

Authors
  1. R. Kaushal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Jayaparkash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Mandal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ambrish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. M. Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. M. S. Tomar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. O. P. Chaturvedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kaushal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaushal, R., Jayaparkash, J., Mandal, D. et al. Canopy management practices in mulberry: impact on fine and coarse roots. Agroforest Syst 93, 545–556 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0148-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0148-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation