Skip to main content
Log in

Grass, mosses, algae, or leaves? Food preference among shredders from open-canopy streams

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shredder feeding is a vital process in making decomposition products available to biota in streams. To investigate which food sources shredders in open-canopy streams exploit, we conducted a feeding preference experiment with the invertebrate detritivores Limnephilus bipunctatus and Nemoura sp., which are commonly found in open-canopy streams on the Swedish island of Öland in the southern Baltic Sea. Leaves of birch, Swedish whitebeam, and shrubby cinquefoil; dead and fresh grass; water moss; and algae were offered to the shredders in multi- and single treatments. We hypothesized that food with high nutritional value would be preferred. Both taxa preferred leaves of shrubby cinquefoil, a bush common in the riparian zone of Öland streams; additionally Nemoura sp. also chose algae. Dead grass, the most abundant food source in the streams during the whole year, was the least consumed food type. The fresh food types had highest nutritional value, measured as carbon to nitrogen content. Therefore, food quality could not alone explain the preference of shrubby cinquefoil. However, among the detritus type offered, shrubby cinquefoil had the highest nutritional value. Shrubby cinquefoil may constitute one important energy source to these open-canopy stream ecosystems and may be essential in maintaining an abundant shredder community in these streams. Thus, the results of this study indicate that detrital resources are indeed important in open-canopy stream systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelho M, Graça MAS (1996) Effects of eucalyptus afforestation on leaf litter dynamics and macroinvertebrate community structure of streams in central Portugal. Hydrobiol 324:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NH, Sedell JR (1979) Detritus processing by macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Entomol 24:351–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F (2005) A primer for statistical analysis. In: Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 313–329

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelke U, Herrmann J (2005) Processing of two detritus types by lake-dwelling shredders: species-specific impacts and effects of species richness. J Anim Ecol 74:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelke U, Bohman IM, Herrmann J (2005) Temporal niches of shredders in lake littorals with possible implications on ecosystem functioning. Aquat Ecol 39:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canhoto C, Graça MAS (1995) Food value of introduced eucalypt leaves for a mediterranean stream detritivore—Tipula lateralis. Freshw Biol 34:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DW, Demory RL (1963) Seasonal-changes in food ingested by aquatic insect larvae and nymphs in 2 Oregon streams. Ecology 44:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves ML, Rieradevall M, Chainho P, Costa JL, Costa MJ, Prat N (2008) Macroinvertebrate communities of non-glacial high altitude intermittent streams. Freshw Biol 53:55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich AP, Palmer MA, Crowl TA (1999) The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems—zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. Bioscience 49:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins KW, Petersen RC, Howard FO, Wuyckeck JC, Holt VI (1973) The utilization of leaf litter by stream detritivores. Ecology 54:336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins KW, Wilzbach MA, Gates DM, Perry JB, Taliferro WB (1989) Shredders and riparian vegetation—leaf litter that falls into streams influences communities of stream invertebrates. Bioscience 39:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong MD, Brusven MA (1998) Macroinvertebrate community structure along the longitudinal gradient of an agriculturally impacted stream. Environ Manage 22:445–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SG, Likens GE (1973) Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire—integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecol Monogr 43:421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken RJM, Gardeniers JJP, Peeters E (2007) Secondary production of Gammarus pulex Linnaeus in small temperate streams that differ in riparian canopy cover. Fund Appl Limnol 168:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friberg N, Jacobsen D (1994) Feeding plasticity of 2 detritivore-shredders. Freshw Biol 32:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO (2000) Breakdown and nutrient dynamics of submerged phragmites shoots in the littoral zone of a temperate hardwater lake. Aquat Bot 66:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO, Chauvet E, Dobson M (1999) A perspective on leaf litter breakdown in streams. Oikos 85:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez JM, Graça MAS (2003) Conversion of leaf litter to secondary production by a shredding caddis-fly. Freshw Biol 48:1578–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graça MAS (2001) The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams—a review. Int Rev Hydrobiol 86:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladyz S, Gessner MO, Giller PS, Pozo J, Woodward G (2009) Resource quality and stoichiometric constraints on stream ecosystem functioning. Freshw Biol 54:957–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inkley MD, Wissinger SA, Baros BL (2008) Effects of drying regime on microbial colonization and shredder preference in seasonal woodland wetlands. Freshw Biol 53:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons JG, Oswood MW, Bryant JP (1988) Consumption of leaf detritus by a stream shredder—influence of tree species and nutrient status. Hydrobiol 160:53–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieske R, Zwick P (2007) Food preference, growth and maturation of Nemurella pictetii (Plecoptera: Nemouridae). Freshw Biol 52:1187–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay WP, Zak J, Whitford WG (1992) Litter decomposition in a Chihuahuan desert playa. Am Midl Natur 128:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ (1988) North-American prairie streams as systems for ecological study. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:387–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menninger HL, Palmer MA (2007) Herbs and grasses as an allochthonous resource in open-canopy headwater streams. Freshw Biol 52:1689–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihuc TB, Mihuc JR (1995) Trophic ecology of 5 shredders in a rocky-mountain stream. J Freshw Ecol 10:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Monakov AV (2003) Feeding of freshwater invertebrates. Kenobi Productions, Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo J, Basaguren A, Elosegui A, Molinero J, Fabre E, Chauvet E (1998) Afforestation with Eucalyptus globulus and leaf litter decomposition in streams of northern Spain. Hydrobiol 373(374):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JS (1991) Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream—an experimental test. Ecology 72:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solem JO, Gullefors B (1996) Trichoptera, caddisflies. In: Nilsson A (ed) The aquatic insects of North Europe. Apollo Books Aps, Stenstrup, pp 223–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, Crowe TP (2004) Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300:161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, Webster JR, Cuffney TF (1982) Stream detritus dynamics regulation by invertebrate consumers. Oecologia 53:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR (1997) Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR (1999) Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 69:409–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace ID, Wallace B, Philipson GN (2003) A key to the case-bearing caddis larvae of Britain and Ireland. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch BL (1951) On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika 38:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD (2006) The biology of temporary waters. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RG, Huryn AD, Townsend CR (1994) Effects of agricultural-development on processing of tussock leaf-litter in high country New-Zealand streams. Freshw Biol 32:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mats Iversjö for help with sorting of CPOM samples and Christina Esplund for running the CHN analyzer. Thanks also to Jan Herrmann and Patrik Stenroth for valuable comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript and to Peter Travis for language review. Three anonymous referees provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by the Faculty Board of Natural Science and Engineering at University of Kalmar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Leberfinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leberfinger, K., Bohman, I. Grass, mosses, algae, or leaves? Food preference among shredders from open-canopy streams. Aquat Ecol 44, 195–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-009-9268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-009-9268-1

Keywords

Navigation