Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Active Muscles on Astronaut Kinematics and Injury Risk for Piloted Lunar Landing and Launch While Standing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While astronauts may pilot future lunar landers in a standing posture, the response of the human body under lunar launch and landing-related dynamic loading conditions is not well understood. It is important to consider the effects of active muscles under these loading conditions as muscles stabilize posture while standing. In the present study, astronaut response for a piloted lunar mission in a standing posture was simulated using an active human body model (HBM) with a closed-loop joint-angle based proportional integral derivative controller muscle activation strategy and compared with a passive HBM to understand the effects of active muscles on astronaut body kinematics and injury risk. While head, neck, and lumbar spine injury risk were relatively unaffected by active muscles, the lower extremity injury risk and the head and arm kinematics were significantly changed. Active muscle prevented knee-buckling and spinal slouching and lowered tibia injury risk in the active vs. passive model (revised tibia index: 0.02–0.40 vs. 0.01–0.58; acceptable tolerance: 0.43). Head displacement was higher in the active vs. passive model (11.6 vs. 9.0 cm forward, 6.3 vs. 7.0 cm backward, 7.9 vs. 7.3 cm downward, 3.7 vs. 2.4 cm lateral). Lower arm movement was seen with the active vs. passive model (23 vs. 35 cm backward, 12 vs. 20 cm downward). Overall simulations suggest that the passive model may overpredict injury risk in astronauts for spaceflight loading conditions, which can be improved using the model with active musculature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beeman, S. M., A. R. Kemper, M. L. Madigan, and S. M. Duma. Effects of bracing on human kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:2998–3010, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Devane, K., D. Johnson, and F. S. Gayzik. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj. Prev. 20:832–837, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ejima, S., Y. Zama, F. Satou, S. Holcombe, K. Ono, K. Kaneoka, and I. Shiina. Prediction of the physical motion of the human body based on muscle activity during pre-impact braking. Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Bern, Switzerland, 2008, pp. 163–175.

  4. Gaewsky, J. P., D. A. Jones, X. Ye, B. Koya, K. P. McNamara, F. S. Gayzik, A. A. Weaver, J. B. Putnam, J. T. Somers, and J. D. Stitzel. Modeling human volunteers in multidirectional, uni-axial sled tests using a finite element human body model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 47:487–511, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kemper, A. R., S. M. Beeman, M. L. Madigan, and S. M. Duma. Human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests: effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression, reaction forces, and subject acceleration. Traffic Inj. Prev. 15:S141–S150, 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerrigan, J. R., B. J. Ivarsson, D. Bose, N. J. Madeley, S. A. Millington, K. S. Bhalla, and J. R. Crandall. Rate-sensitive constitutive and failure properties of human collateral knee ligaments. Proc. 2003 IRCOBI Conf., 2003, pp. 177–190.

  7. Krašna, S., and S. Đorđević. Estimating the effects of awareness on neck-muscle loading in frontal impacts with EMG and MC sensors. Sensors. 20:3942, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lalwala, M., K. Devane, B. Koya, L. Q. Vu, K. Dolick, K. M. Yates, N. J. Newby, J. T. Somers, F. S. Gayzik, J. D. Stitzel, and A. A. Weaver. Development and validation of an active muscle simplified finite element human body model in a standing posture. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03077-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lalwala, M., K. S. Devane, B. Koya, F.-C. Hsu, F. S. Gayzik, and A. A. Weaver. Sensitivity analysis for multidirectional spaceflight loading and muscle deconditioning on astronaut response. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03054-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lalwala, M., B. Koya, K. S. Devane, F.-C. Hsu, K. M. Yates, N. J. Newby, J. T. Somers, F. S. Gayzik, J. D. Stitzel, and A. A. Weaver. Simulated astronaut kinematics and injury risk for piloted lunar landings and launches while standing. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 50:1857–1871, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noyes, F. R., D. L. Butler, E. S. Grood, R. F. Zernicke, and M. S. Hefzy. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 66:344–352, 1984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pintar, F., P. Ivancic, M. Kleinberger, and J. Rupp. Occupant protection risk SRP research plan review. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Jhonson Space Center, Houston, Texas, 2015.

  13. Prietto, M. P., J. R. Bain, S. N. Stonebrook, and R. A. Settlage. Tensile strength of the human posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 13:736–745, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Somers, J. T., D. Gohmert, and J. W. Brinkley. Application of the Brinkley dynamic response criterion to spacecraft transient dynamic events. NASA Tech. Memo. NASA/TM-2013-217380-REV1, 2017.

  15. Somers, J. T., T. Reiber, J. Pattarini, N. Newby, and P. Greenhalgh. Lunar transient accelerations white paper. NASA Tech. Memo. NASA/TM-20205008198 , 2020.

  16. Yeomans, J. Tactile, acoustic and vestibular systems sum to elicit the startle reflex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26:1–11, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a NASA Human Research Program Student Augmentation Award to NASA Grant No. NNX16AP89G. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the GHBMC, NASA, or KBR. All simulations were run on the Wake Forest University DEAC high performance computing cluster with the support of Cody Stevens and Adam Carlson.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Stitzel and Dr. Gayzik are co-owners and Dr. Weaver is a consultant of Elemance, LLC, which provides academic and commercial licenses for the GHBMC-owned human body computer models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley A. Weaver.

Additional information

Associate Editor Stefan M. Duma oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 2758 kb).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lalwala, M., Devane, K.S., Koya, B. et al. Effect of Active Muscles on Astronaut Kinematics and Injury Risk for Piloted Lunar Landing and Launch While Standing. Ann Biomed Eng 51, 1408–1419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03143-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03143-y

Keywords

Navigation