Abstract
In musculoskeletal modeling, reliable estimates of muscle moment arms are an important step in accurately predicting muscle forces and joint moments. The degree of agreement between the two common methods of calculating moment arms—tendon excursion (TE) and geometric origin–insertion, is currently unknown for the muscles crossing the knee joint. Further, measured moment arm data are subject to variability in estimation of attachment sites as points from irregular surfaces on the bones, and due to differences in joint kinematics observed in vivo. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to compare moment arms of major muscles crossing the knee joint obtained from TE and geometric methods using a finite element-based lower extremity model, and to quantify the effects of potential muscle origin–insertion and tibiofemoral kinematic variability on the predicted moment arms using probabilistic methods. A semiconstrained, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty was included due to available in vivo kinematic data. In this study, muscle origin and insertion locations and kinematic variables were represented as normal distributions with standard deviations of 5 mm for origin–insertion locations and up to 1.6 mm and 3.0° for the kinematic parameters. Agreement between the deterministic moment arm calculations from the two methods was excellent for the flexors, while differences in trends and magnitudes were observed for the extensor muscles. Model-predicted deterministic moment arms from both methods agreed reasonably with the experimental values from available literature. The uncertainty in input parameters resulted in substantial variability in predicted moment arms, with the size of 1–99% confidence interval being up to 41.3 and 35.8 mm for the TE and geometric methods, respectively. The sizeable range of moment arm predictions and associated excursions has the potential to affect a muscle’s operating range on the force–length curve, thus affecting joint moments. In this study, moment arm predictions were more dependent on muscle origin–insertion locations than the kinematic variables. The important parameters from the TE method were the origin and insertion locations in the sagittal plane, while the insertion location in the sagittal plane was the dominant parameter using the geometric method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An K. N., B. M. Kwak, E. Y. Chao, B. F. Morrey 1984 Determination of muscle and joint forces: A new technique to solve the indeterminate problem. J. Biomech. Eng. 106:364–367
Arnold A. S., S. Salinas, D. J. Asakawa, S. L. Delp 2000 Accuracy of muscle moment arms estimated from MRI-based musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity. Comput. Aided Surg. 5:108–119
Blemker S. S., S. L. Delp 2006 Rectus femoris and vastus intermedius fiber excursions predicted by three-dimensional muscle models. J. Biomech. 39:1383–1391
Boyd S. K., J. L. Ronsky 1998 Instantaneous moment arm determination of the cat knee. J. Biomech. 31:279–283
Brand R. A., R. D. Crowninshield, C. E. Wittstock, D. R. Pedersen, C. R. Clark, F. M. van Krieken 1982 A model of lower extremity muscular anatomy. J. Biomech. Eng. 104:304–310
Buford W. L. Jr., F. M. Ivey Jr., J. D. Malone, R. M. Patterson, G. L. Peare, D. K. Nguyen, A. A. Stewart 1997 Muscle balance at the knee—moment arms for the normal knee and the ACL-minus knee. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 5:367–379
Burkholder T. J., R. L. Lieber 1998 Sarcomere number adaptation after retinaculum transection in adult mice. J. Exp. Biol. 201:309–316
della Croce U., A. Cappozzo, D. C. Kerrigan 1999 Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37:155–161
Delp, S. Surgery simulation: A computer-graphics system to analyze and design musculoskeletal reconstructions of the lower limb. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1990
Dennis, D. A., R. D. Komistek, M. R. Mahfouz, B. D. Haas, and J. B. Stiehl. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res 416:37–57, 2003
Easley S. K., S. Pal, P. R. Tomaszewski, A. J. Petrella, P. J. Rullkoetter, P. J. Laz 2007 Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 85:32–40
Gill H. S., J. J. O’Connor 1996 Biarticulating two-dimensional computer model of the human patellofemoral joint. Clin Biomech. 11:81–89
Haldar A., S. Mahadevan 2000 Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY
Halloran J. P., S. K. Easley, A. J. Petrella, P. J. Rullkoetter 2005 Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:813–818
Herzog W., L. J. Read 1993 Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. J. Anatomy 182:213–230
Hoy M. G., F. E. Zajac, M. E. Gordon 1990 A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: the effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment–angle relationship of musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. J. Biomech. 23:157–169
Hughes R. E., G. Niebur, J. Liu, K.-N An 1998 Comparison of two methods for computing abduction moment arms of the rotator cuff. J. Biomech. 31:157–160
Imran A., R. A. Huss, H. Holstein, J. J. O’Connor 2000 The variation in the orientations and moment arms of the knee extensor and flexor muscle tendons with increasing muscle force: a mathematical analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]. 214:277–286
Karlsson D., B. Peterson 1992 Towards a model for force predictions in the human shoulder. J. Biomech. 25:189–199
Kellis E., V. Baltzopoulos 1999 In vivo determination of the patella tendon and hamstrings moment arms in adult males using videofluoroscopy during submaximal knee extension and flexion. Clin. Biomech. 14:118–124
Kepple T. M., A. S. Arnold, S. J. Stanhope, K. L. Siegel 1994 Assessment of a method to estimate muscle attachments from surface landmarks: a 3D computer graphics approach. J. Biomech. 27:365–371
Komistek, R. D., D. A. Dennis, and M. Mahfouz. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 410:69–81, 2003
Krevolin J. L., M. G. Pandy, J. C. Pearce 2004 Moment arm of the patellar tendon in the human knee. J. Biomech. 37:785–788
Laz P. J., S. Pal, J. P. Halloran, A. J. Petrella, P. J. Rullkoetter 2006 Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. J. Biomech. 39:2303–2310
Maganaris C. N. 2004 Imaging-based estimates of moment arm length in intact human muscle-tendons. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 91:130–139
Murray W. M., T. S. Buchanan, S. L. Delp 2002 Scaling of peak moment arms of elbow muscles with upper extremity bone dimensions. J. Biomech. 35:19–26
Murray W. M., S. L. Delp, T. S. Buchanan 1995 Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm position. J. Biomech. 28:513–525
Pal S., C. Hammill, P. Rullkoetter, M. Mahfouz, R. D. Komistek 2004 In vivo determination of tibiofemoral contact for subjects having PS and PCR TKA. Trans. ORS. 29:1380
Pandy M. G. 1999 Moment arm of a muscle force. In: J. O. Holloszy (ed) Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 79–118
Smidt G. L. 1973 Biomechanical analysis of knee flexion and extension. J. Biomech. 6:79–92
Spoor C. W., J. L. van Leeuwen, W. J. van der Meulen, A. Huson 1991 Active force–length relationship of human lower-leg muscles estimated from morphological data: a comparison of geometric muscle models. Eur. J. Morphol. 29:137–160
Tsaopoulos D. E., V. Baltzopoulos, C. N. Maganaris 2006 Human patellar tendon moment arm length: measurement considerations and clinical implications for joint loading assessment. Clin. Biomech. 21:657–667
van der Helm F. C. T. 1994 A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism. J. Biomech. 27:551–569
White S. C., H. J. Yack, D. A. Winter 1989 A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model for gait analysis. Anatomical variability estimates. J. Biomech. 22:885–893
Wilson D. L., Q. Zhu, J. L. Duerk, J. M. Mansour, K. Kilgore, P. E. Crago 1999 Estimation of tendon moment arms from three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27:247–256
Woltring H. J., K. Long, P. J. Osterbauer, A. W. Fuhr 1994 Instantaneous helical axis estimation from 3-D video data in neck kinematics for whiplash diagnostics. J. Biomech. 27:1415–1432
Wu Y. T., H. R. Millwater, T. A. Cruse 1990 Advanced probabilistic structural-analysis method for implicit performance functions. Aiaa J. 28:1663–1669
Yoshiya S., N. Matsui, R. D. Komistek, D. A. Dennis, M. Mahfouz, M. Kurosaka 2005 In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J. Arthroplasty 20:777–783
Yuen T. J., M. S. Orendurff 2006 A comparison of gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit length during gait using anatomic, cadaveric and MRI models. Gait Posture. 23:112–117
Zajac F. E. 1989 Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17:359–411
Acknowledgment
This research was supported in part by DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pal, S., Langenderfer, J.E., Stowe, J.Q. et al. Probabilistic Modeling of Knee Muscle Moment Arms: Effects of Methods, Origin–Insertion, and Kinematic Variability. Ann Biomed Eng 35, 1632–1642 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9334-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9334-6