Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inverse Parameter Fitting of Biological Tissues: A Response Surface Approach

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present the application of a semi-global inverse method for determining material parameters of biological tissues. The approach is based on the successive response surface method, and is illustrated by fitting constitutive parameters to two nonlinear anisotropic constitutive equations, one for aortic sinus and aortic wall, the other for aortic valve tissue. Material test data for the aortic sinus consisted of two independent orthogonal uniaxial tests. Material test data for the aortic valve was obtained from a dynamic inflation test. In each case, a numerical simulation of the experiment was performed and predictions were compared to the real data. For the uniaxial test simulation, the experimental targets were force at a measured displacement. For the inflation test, the experimental targets were the three-dimensional coordinates of material markers at a given pressure. For both sets of tissues, predictions with converged parameters showed excellent agreement with the data, and we found that the method was able to consistently identify model parameters. We believe the method will find wide application in biomedical material characterization and in diagnostic imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamczyk, M. M., and I. Vesely. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11(5):688–695, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bathe, K. J. ADINA Theory and Modeling Guide. Watertown, MA: ADINA R&D, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cox, S. E., R. T. Haftka, C. A. Baker, B. Grossman, W. H. Mason, and L. T. Watson. A comparison of global optimization methods for the design of a high-speed civil transport. J. Global Optimization 21:415–433, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Freed, A. D., and T. C. Doehring. Elastic model for crimped collagen fibrils. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 127:587–593, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freed, A. D., D. R. Einstein, and I. Vesely. Invariant formulation for dispersed transverse isotropy in aortic heart valves. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-005-0069-8

  6. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elasticity 61:1–48, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kauer, M., V. Vuskovic, J. Dual, G. Szekely, and M. Bajka. Inverse inite element characterization of soft tissues. Med. Image Anal. 6:275–287, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. C. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, IV, Piscataway, NJ, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.

  10. Moulton, M. J., L. L. Creswell, R. L. Actis, K. W. Myers, M. W. Vannier, B. A. Szabo, and M. K. Pasque. An inverse approach to determining myocardial material properties. J. Biomech. 28:935–948, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers, R. H., and D. C. Montgomery. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York: Wiley, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roux, W. J., N. Stander, and R. T. Haftka. Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 42:517–534, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacks, M. S. Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials. J. Elasticity 61:199–246, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Seshaiyer, P., and J. D. Humphrey. A sub-domain inverse finite element characterization of hyperelastic membranes including soft tissues. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 125:363–371, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Snyman, J. A. The LFOPC leap-frog algorithm for constrained optimization. Comput. Math. Appl. 40:1085–1096, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer, A. J. M. Deformations of Fibre-Reinforced Materials. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stander, N., and K. J. Craig. On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation-based optimization. Eng. Comput. 19:431–450, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stander, N., K. J. Craig, H. Muellerschoen, and R. Reichert. Material identification in structural optimization using response surfaces. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29(2):92–103, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stander, N., T. Eggleston, K. Craig, and W. Roux. LS-OPT User's Manual. Livermore, CA: LSTC, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sussman, T., and K. J. Bathe. Finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis. Comput. Struct. 26:357–409, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wood, G. A., and R. N. Marshall. The accuracy of DLT extrapolation in three-dimensional film analysis. J. Biomech. 19(9):781–785, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Einstein PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Einstein, D.R., Freed, A.D., Stander, N. et al. Inverse Parameter Fitting of Biological Tissues: A Response Surface Approach. Ann Biomed Eng 33, 1819–1830 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8338-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8338-3

Keywords

Navigation