Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical Salvage of Recurrent Rectal Carcinoma After Curative Resection: a 10-Year Experience

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Local recurrence after resection of rectal carcinoma is a difficult clinical problem that adversely affects both survival and quality of life. Surgical resection is possible for a subset of patients with localized recurrences. We reviewed our experience with surgical salvage of recurrent rectal carcinoma, to determine predictors of resectability and postsalvage survival rates.

Methods: A 10-year, retrospective analysis of 131 patients who underwent exploration with curative intent for local recurrence after radical resection of rectal carcinomas, in a single referral institution, was performed. Preoperative and pathological factors were examined for their ability to predict postresection survival rates and resectability.

Results: The overall 5-year survival rate for patients who underwent exploration with curative intent was 24%. Resection of recurrent disease was possible for 103 of 131 (79%) patients, with a resulting 5-year survival rate of 31%. Patients who were treated initially with abdomino-perineal resection (n = 35) presented later and were less likely to have resectable tumors than were those treated initially with some form of sphincter-preserving resection (n = 96). Among patients who could undergo resection, normal carcinoembryonic antigen levels and recurrent disease limited to the bowel wall were both favorable features.

Conclusions: Surgical salvage of local recurrence after radical resection of rectal carcinoma can be performed safely and can result in substantial long-term survival benefits for selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Pilipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SH, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal Cancer. Cancer 1984;53:1354–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1978;135:505–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gunderson LL, Sosin H. Areas of failure found at reoperation (second or symptomatic look) following “curative surgery” for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Cancer 1974;34:1278–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao AR, Kagan AR, Chan PM, Gilbert HA, Nussbaum H, Hintz BL. Patterns of recurrence following curative resection alone for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Cancer 1981;48:1492–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donald-son G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal Cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer 1983;52:1317–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen AM, Minsky BD. Aggressive surgical management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. current status and future directions. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:432–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hermanek P. pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance. World J Surg 1995;19:184–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison LB, Enker WE, Anderson LL. High-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy for colorectal cancer. Oncology 1995;9:737–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Enker WE, et al. Preoperative 5-FU, low-dose leucovorin, and radiation therapy for locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37:289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Minsky BD, Conti J, Cohen AM, Enker WE. Acute toxicity of neoadjuvant bolus 5-FU/methotrexate and leucovorin rescue followed by continuous infusion 5-FU plus pre-operative radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol Invest 1996;4:90–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki K, Dozois RR, Devine RM, et al. Curative reoperations for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:730–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Polk HC, Spratt JS. The results of treatment of perineal recurrence of Cancer of the rectum. Cancer 1979;43:952–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison LE, Guillem JG, Paty P, Cohen AM. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts outcomes in node-negative cancer patients: a multivariate analysis of 572 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:50–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf RF, Cohen AM. The minuscule benefit of serial carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after effective curative treatment for primary colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:60–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pihl E, Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Price AB. Recurrence of carcinoma of the colon and rectum at the anastomotic suture line. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:495–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Stulc JP, Davidson B, Petrelli NJ. Prognostic significance of anastomotic recurrence from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:838–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vassilopoulos PP, Yoon JM, Ledesma EJ, Mittelman A. Treatment of recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum at the anastomotic site. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:777–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salo, J.C., Paty, P.B., Guillem, J. et al. Surgical Salvage of Recurrent Rectal Carcinoma After Curative Resection: a 10-Year Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 6, 171–177 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0171-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0171-8

Key Words

Navigation