Skip to main content
Log in

Early Postoperative Oral Feeding After Colectomy: An Analysis of Factors That May Predict Failure

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that early postoperative oral feeding is feasible. Traditionally patients were fed when flatus or defecation documented the return of bowel function. This study was undertaken to determine factors that may preclude early feeding.

Methods: One hundred four successive patients underwent colorectal surgery from October 1999 to January 2001. Eighty-nine patients started an oral diet either on postoperative day 1 or 2. Their clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively. Fifteen of the 104 patients were excluded for small-bowel resection 5 patients, perioperative complications 5 patients, prior radiation 3 patients, and small-bowel obstruction 2 patients. A failure in postoperative feeding consisted of nausea, vomiting, or readmission.

Results: The mean age of our cohort was 65 years range, 28–87 years. There were 45 male and 44 female patients. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6 days range, 3–13 days. The median American Society of Anesthesiology score was II range, I–IV. The types of resection performed were right colectomy 27 patients, low anterior resection 26 patients, sigmoid resection 11 patients, abdominoperineal resection 8 patients, formation or closure of colostomy 7 patients, posterior pelvic exenteration 4 patients, total colectomy 3 patients, left colectomy 2 patients, and transverse colectomy 1 patient. Sixty-five patients 73% tolerated early oral feeding. Of the 24 patients that did not, 16 had nausea or emesis, and 8 required readmission for postoperative complications small-bowel obstruction [4 patients], wound dehiscence [1 patient], abdominal pain [1 patient], and anastomotic leak [2 patients]. Univariate analysis revealed that the use of volume expanders contributed to intolerance of early feeding. On multivariate analysis, blood loss during the operation was the only factor contributing to failure of early postoperative oral feeding.

Conclusions: Early oral feeding is safe and feasible for postcolectomy patients with a history of colorectal neoplasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja GD, Goldstein DS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 1: 144–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 703–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiFronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX. Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 941–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ortiz H, Armendariz P, Yarnoz C. Is early postoperative feeding feasible in elective colon and rectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 1996; 11: 119–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binderow SR, Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ. Must early postoperative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy? Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 584–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bufo AJ, Feldman S, Daniels GA, Liegerman RC. Early postoperative feeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1260–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartsell PA, Frazee RC, Harrison JB, Smith RW. Early postoperative feeding after elective colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 518–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT, Fink RJ, Mackay JR, Keck JO. Early feeding after elective open colorectal resection: a prospective randomized trial. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68: 125–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stochi L, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. J Surg Oncol 1998; 68: 255–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson M, Byrd C, Pierce C, et al. Laparoscopic colon resections: a five-year retrospective review. Am Surg 2000; 66: 245–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. SPSS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 10.0. 1999; Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 1947; 18: 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petrelli NJ, Stulc JP, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Blumenson L. Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 1993; 59: 632–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer JJ, Gelernt IM, Salky BA, Kreel I. Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary? Ann Surg 1985; 201: 233–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rothnie NG, KempHarper RA, Catchpole BN. Early postoperative gastrointestinal motility. Lancet 1963; 2: 64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woods JH, Erickson LW, Condon RE, Schulte WJ, Sillin LF. Post-operative ileus: a colonic problem? Surgery 1978; 84: 527–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 46–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 51–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 73–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cali RL, Meade PG, Swanson MS, Freeman M. Effect of morphine and incision length on bowel functin after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 163–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas J. Petrelli MD.

Additional information

Presented in part at the 54th Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 15–18, 2001.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrelli, N.J., Cheng, C., Driscoll, D. et al. Early Postoperative Oral Feeding After Colectomy: An Analysis of Factors That May Predict Failure. Ann Surg Oncol 8, 796–800 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0796-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0796-8

Key Words

Navigation