Abstract
Due to small dimensions and low fluid velocity, mixing in microfluidic systems is usually poor. In this study, we report a method of enhancing microfluidic mixing using acoustically induced gas bubbles. The effect of applied frequency on mixing was investigated over the range 0.5–10 kHz. Under either low frequency 0.5 kHz or high frequency 10 kHz, no noticeable improvement in the present mixer was observed. However, a significant increase in the mixing efficiency was achieved within a window of the frequencies between 1.0 and 5.0 kHz. It was found in our present microfluidic structure, single (or multi-) bubble(s) could be acoustically generated under the frequency ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 kHz by a piezoelectric disc. The interaction between bubble and acoustic field causes bubble oscillation which in turn could disturb local flow field to result in mixing enhancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bau HH, Zhong J, Yi M (2001) A minute magneto hydro dynamic (MHD) mixer. Sens Actuators B 79:207–215
Beebe D, Mensing GA, Walker GM (2002) Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 4:261–286
Biddiss E, Erickson D, Li D (2004) Heterogeneous surface charge enhanced micromixing for electrokinetic flows. Anal Chem 76:3208–3213
El Moctar AO, Aubry N, Batton J (2003) Electro hydrodynamic micro-fluidic mixer. Lab Chip 3:273–280
Erickson D, Li D (2004) Integrated microfluidic devices. Anal Chim Acta 507:11–26
Glasgow I, Aubry N (2003) Enhancement of microfluidic mixing using time pulsing. Lab Chip 3:114–120
He B, Burke BJ, Zhang X, Zhang R, Reginer FE (2001) A picoliter-volume mixer for microfluidic analytical systems. Anal Chem 73:1942–1947
Hessel V, Loewe H, Schoenfield F (2005) Micromixers-a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Eng Sci 60:2479–2501
Herbert E, Balibar S, Caupin F (2006) Cavitation pressure in water. Phys Rev E 74:041603
Liau A, Karnik R, Majumdar A, Cate JD (2005) Mixing crowded biological solutions in microfluidics. Anal Chem 77:7618–7625
Liu RH, Stremler M, Sharp KV, Olsen MG, Santiago JG, Adrian RJ, Aref H, Beebe DJ (2000) J Microelectromech Syst 9:190–197
Liu RH, Yang J, Pindera MZ, Athavale M, Grodzinski P (2002) Bubble-induced acoustic micromixing. Lab chip 2:151–157
Luo C, Huang XY, Nguyen NT (2007) Generation of shock free pressure waves in shaped resonators by boundary driving. J Acoustic Soc Am 121:2515–2525
Madan S, Sameer I (2005) Method and apparatus for acoustic suppression of cavitation. US Patent 6846365
Nguyen NT, Wu ZG (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15:R1–R16
Oddy MH, Santiago JG, Mikkelsen JC (2001) Electrokinetic instability micromixing. Anal Chem 73:5822–5832
Song H, Li HW, Munson MS, van Ha TG, Ismagilov RF (2006) On-chip titration of an anticoagulant argatroban and determination of the clotting time within whole blood or plasma using a plug-based microfluidic system. Anal Chem 78:4839–4849
Stroock AD, Dertinger SK, Ajdari A, Mezic I, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2002) Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295:647–651
Tudos AJ, Besselink GAJ, Schasfoort RBM (2001) Trends in miniaturized total analysis systems for point-of-care testing in clinical chemistry. Lab Chip 1:83–85
Yang Z, Matsumoto S, Goto H, Matsumoto M, Maeda R (2001) Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sens Actuators A 93:266–272
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S.S., Jiao, Z.J., Huang, X.Y. et al. Acoustically induced bubbles in a microfluidic channel for mixing enhancement. Microfluid Nanofluid 6, 847–852 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0357-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0357-6