Abstract
Background
Evidence-Based Medicine. Physicians who properly practise EBM use both individual clinical expertise and the best available external evidence—neither one to the exclusion of the other. This remains the modality of EBM however and, unfortunately, is rarely practised. Evidence-Based Public Health. Similar to EBM, EBPH too is often misunderstood to mean a direct application of the evidence. Such a dogmatic interpretation of this evidence can be seen as a manifestation of representationalism, the philosophic stance that some ways of looking at the world give a more privileged and unmediated view of reality than others.
Methods and results
This commentary provides a critical perspective on the current use and misuse of EBPH. As EBM has been in usage longer than EBPH, we start with comments on EBM.
Conclusion
A reconsideration of EBPH would admit that values cannot be expunged from our work; rather, they need to play a foundational role. We must draw upon other forms of knowing, such as the arts, in order to practice medicine and public health with attention to transcendent concerns such as morality and social justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
DeVries RG (2004) The warp of evidence-based medicine: lessons from Dutch maternity care. Soc Sci Med 34(4):595–623
Ellul J (1964) The technological society. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Ellul J (1990) The technological bluff. W. B. Saunders, Grand Rapids, MI
Good B (1994) Medicine, rationality, and experience. Cambridge University Press, New York
Guyatt G, Cook D, Haynes B (2004) Evidence based medicine has come a long way. BMJ 329:990–991
Kemm J (2005) The limitations of ‘evidence-based’ public health. J Eval in Clin Pract 12(3):319–324
Rorty R (1982) Consequences of pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN
Rorty R (1991) Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72
Sontag S (2003) Regarding the pain of others. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York
Straus SE, McAlister FA (2000) Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. CMAJ 163(7):837–841
Tonelli MR (1998) The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 73:1234–1240
Waitzkin H, Iriart C, Estrada A, Lamadrid S (2001) Social medicine then and now: lessons from Latin America. Am J Pub Health 91(10):1592–1601
Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, MA
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no relevant associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Copyright: The authors guarantee that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright owners, that the rights of third parties will not be violated, and that the publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.
Details of contributors: All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, S., Slingsby, B.T., Inada, M.K. et al. Evidence-based public health: a critical perspective. J Public Health 16, 169–172 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0156-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0156-7