Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pre-banking microbial contamination of donor conjunctiva and storage medium for penetrating keratoplasty

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence of positive donor tissue cultures before transfer to preservation medium (Optisol™-GS) for penetrating keratoplasty, to verify the efficacy of antibiotics contained in Optisol™-GS by examining the drug susceptibility and to assess the relationship between the results of our microbial assessments as well as donor factors and the incidence of contamination.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using Juntendo Eye Bank records for all corneal transplantations. Two hundred donor conjunctiva harvestings and storage medium (EP-II®) cultures were performed between July 2008 and June 2011. We analyzed the associations between donor factors (age, gender, history of cataract surgery, death-to-preservation interval, cause of death) and contamination rates using multivariate analysis by the generalized estimating equation model.

Results

We obtained positive bacterial cultures from 154 of the 200 eyes (77.0%). The isolated bacteria were indigenous, such as coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium sp., and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There was significant resistance to levofloxacin (18 eyes, 9.0%) and gentamicin (12 eyes, 6.0%), and no vancomycin-resistant bacteria were detected. The donor factors did not correlate with the prevalence of bacterial contamination in our criteria.

Conclusions

Pre-banking microbial assessment allows for microbial detection, bacterial susceptibility and resistance testing. This is useful for developing preservation mediums containing effective spectrum antibiotic agents for high quality control of corneal banking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiken-O’Neill P, Mannis MJ. Summary of comeal transplant activity Eye Bank Association of America. Cornea. 2002;21:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akova YA, Onat M, Koc F, Nurozler A, Duman S. Microbial keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:449–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams KA, Brereton HM, Coster DJ. Prospects for genetic modulation of corneal graft survival. Eye. 2009;23:1904–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates AK, Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye. 1990;4(Pt 1):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Constantinou M, Jhanji V, Vajpayee RB. Clinical and microbiological profile of post-penetrating keratoplasty infectious keratitis in failed and clear grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(233–7):e2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tavakkoli H, Sugar J. Microbial keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25:356–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonios SR, Cameron JA, Badr IA, Habash NR, Cotter JB. Contamination of donor cornea: postpenetrating keratoplasty endophthalmitis. Cornea. 1991;10:217–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron JA, Badr IA, Miguel Risco J, Abboud E, el Gonnah S. Endophthalmitis cluster from contaminated donor corneas following penetrating keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998;33:8–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guss RB, Koenig S, De La Pena W, Marx M, Kaufman HE. Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:651–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leveille AS, McMullan FD, Cavanagh HD. Endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:38–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pardos GJ, Gallagher MA. Microbial contamination of donor eyes. A retrospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1611–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, McDonnell PJ. Incidence of acute endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:605–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilhelmus KR, Hassan SS. The prognostic role of donor corneoscleral rim cultures in corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:440–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiffen SJ, Weston BC, Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. The value of routine donor corneal rim cultures in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:719–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Everts RJ, Fowler WC, Chang DH, Reller LB. Corneoscleral rim cultures: lack of utility and implications for clinical decision-making and infection prevention in the care of patients undergoing corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2001;20:586–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gomes JA, Dana MR, Dua HS, Goren MB, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Positive donor rim culture in penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1995;14:457–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rehany U, Balut G, Lefler E, Rumelt S. The prevalence and risk factors for donor corneal button contamination and its association with ocular infection after transplantation. Cornea. 2004;23:649–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassan SS, Wilhelmus KR, Dahl P, Davis GC, Roberts RT, Ross KW, et al. Infectious disease risk factors of corneal graft donors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumoto M, Suzuma K, Miyamura N, Imamura N, Kitaoka T. Conjunctival swabs and corneoscleral rim cultures from corneal transplantation donors as possible early indicators for posttransplant endopthalmitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55:321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linke SJ, Fricke OH, Eddy MT, Bednarz J, Druchkiv V, Kaulfers PM, et al. Risk factors for donor cornea contamination: retrospective analysis of 4546 procured corneas in a single eye bank. Cornea. 2013;32:141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group, gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, et al. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome results of the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):620–626.e6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmood MA, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Cornea. 2000;19:468–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, Tanner JP, Beck R, Gal R, et al. Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cornea. 2009;28:981–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Woodmansey EJ. Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:1178–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eye Bank Association of America. Medical Standards 2016 2014 [Available from: http://restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Med-Standards-October-2016.pdf.

  26. Institute CaLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 26th informational supplement M100-S26 2016 [Available from: http://em100.edaptivedocs.info/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSIM100S26:2016&scope=user.

  27. Kaufman HE, Beuerman RW, Steinemann TL, Thompson HW, Varnell ED. Optisol corneal storage medium. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:864–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindstrom RL, Kaufman HE, Skelnik DL, Laing RA, Lass JH, Musch DC, et al. Optisol corneal storage medium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindstrom RL. Advances in corneal preservation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:555–648.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Means TL, Geroski DH, Hadley A, Lynn MJ, Edelhauser HF. Viability of human corneal endothelium following Optisol-GS storage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:805–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mindrup EA, Dubbel PA, Doughman DJ. Betadine decontamination of donor globes. Cornea. 1993;12:324–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murali S, Jambulingam M, Tiru V, Kulanthai LT, Rajagopal R, Padmanaban P, et al. A study on isolation rate and prevalence of drug resistance among microorganisms isolated from multiorgan donor and donor corneal rim along with a report on existence of bla NDM-1 among Indian population. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathers WD, Lemp MA. Corneal rim cultures. Cornea. 1987;6:231–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farrell PL, Fan JT, Smith RE, Trousdale MD. Donor cornea bacterial contamination. Cornea. 1991;10:381–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Borderie VM, Laroche L. Microbiologic study of organ-cultured donor corneas. Transplantation. 1998;66:120–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandboe FD, Medin W, Bjerknes R. Toxicity of vancomycin on corneal endothelium in rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:675–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunningham WJ, Moffatt SL, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank study: trends in the acquisition and storage of corneal tissue over the decade 2000 to 2009. Cornea. 2012;31:538–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sugar A, Gal RL, Beck RW, Ruedy KJ, Blanton CL, Feder RS, et al. Baseline donor characteristics in the Cornea Donor Study. Cornea. 2005;24:389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reddy SC, Paul G. Bacterial flora of conjunctiva after death. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6:632–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Meter WS, Katz DG, White H, Gayheart R. Effect of death-to-preservation time on donor corneal epithelium. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:209–22 (discussion 22-4).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Juntendo Eye Bank, Japan Organ Transplant Network and Oyama Lions Club for their cornea donations. The authors thank Dr. Alireza Mashaghi, Dr. Jiaxu Hong and Dr. Masahiro Nakamura for critically reading and editing the manuscript, Dr. Ayako Nakamura for her microbiological insight and Peter Mallen for his assistance in creating the elegant figure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takenori Inomata.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inomata, T., Ono, K., Matsuba, T. et al. Pre-banking microbial contamination of donor conjunctiva and storage medium for penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61, 369–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0521-1

Keywords

Navigation