Abstract
Purpose
The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence of positive donor tissue cultures before transfer to preservation medium (Optisol™-GS) for penetrating keratoplasty, to verify the efficacy of antibiotics contained in Optisol™-GS by examining the drug susceptibility and to assess the relationship between the results of our microbial assessments as well as donor factors and the incidence of contamination.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using Juntendo Eye Bank records for all corneal transplantations. Two hundred donor conjunctiva harvestings and storage medium (EP-II®) cultures were performed between July 2008 and June 2011. We analyzed the associations between donor factors (age, gender, history of cataract surgery, death-to-preservation interval, cause of death) and contamination rates using multivariate analysis by the generalized estimating equation model.
Results
We obtained positive bacterial cultures from 154 of the 200 eyes (77.0%). The isolated bacteria were indigenous, such as coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Corynebacterium sp., and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There was significant resistance to levofloxacin (18 eyes, 9.0%) and gentamicin (12 eyes, 6.0%), and no vancomycin-resistant bacteria were detected. The donor factors did not correlate with the prevalence of bacterial contamination in our criteria.
Conclusions
Pre-banking microbial assessment allows for microbial detection, bacterial susceptibility and resistance testing. This is useful for developing preservation mediums containing effective spectrum antibiotic agents for high quality control of corneal banking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken-O’Neill P, Mannis MJ. Summary of comeal transplant activity Eye Bank Association of America. Cornea. 2002;21:1–3.
Akova YA, Onat M, Koc F, Nurozler A, Duman S. Microbial keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:449–55.
Williams KA, Brereton HM, Coster DJ. Prospects for genetic modulation of corneal graft survival. Eye. 2009;23:1904–9.
Bates AK, Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye. 1990;4(Pt 1):74–8.
Constantinou M, Jhanji V, Vajpayee RB. Clinical and microbiological profile of post-penetrating keratoplasty infectious keratitis in failed and clear grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(233–7):e2.
Tavakkoli H, Sugar J. Microbial keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25:356–60.
Antonios SR, Cameron JA, Badr IA, Habash NR, Cotter JB. Contamination of donor cornea: postpenetrating keratoplasty endophthalmitis. Cornea. 1991;10:217–20.
Cameron JA, Badr IA, Miguel Risco J, Abboud E, el Gonnah S. Endophthalmitis cluster from contaminated donor corneas following penetrating keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998;33:8–13.
Guss RB, Koenig S, De La Pena W, Marx M, Kaufman HE. Endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:651–8.
Leveille AS, McMullan FD, Cavanagh HD. Endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:38–9.
Pardos GJ, Gallagher MA. Microbial contamination of donor eyes. A retrospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1611–3.
Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, McDonnell PJ. Incidence of acute endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:605–9.
Wilhelmus KR, Hassan SS. The prognostic role of donor corneoscleral rim cultures in corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:440–5.
Wiffen SJ, Weston BC, Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. The value of routine donor corneal rim cultures in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:719–24.
Everts RJ, Fowler WC, Chang DH, Reller LB. Corneoscleral rim cultures: lack of utility and implications for clinical decision-making and infection prevention in the care of patients undergoing corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2001;20:586–9.
Gomes JA, Dana MR, Dua HS, Goren MB, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Positive donor rim culture in penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1995;14:457–62.
Rehany U, Balut G, Lefler E, Rumelt S. The prevalence and risk factors for donor corneal button contamination and its association with ocular infection after transplantation. Cornea. 2004;23:649–54.
Hassan SS, Wilhelmus KR, Dahl P, Davis GC, Roberts RT, Ross KW, et al. Infectious disease risk factors of corneal graft donors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:235–9.
Matsumoto M, Suzuma K, Miyamura N, Imamura N, Kitaoka T. Conjunctival swabs and corneoscleral rim cultures from corneal transplantation donors as possible early indicators for posttransplant endopthalmitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55:321–6.
Linke SJ, Fricke OH, Eddy MT, Bednarz J, Druchkiv V, Kaulfers PM, et al. Risk factors for donor cornea contamination: retrospective analysis of 4546 procured corneas in a single eye bank. Cornea. 2013;32:141–8.
Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group, gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, et al. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome results of the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):620–626.e6.
Mahmood MA, Wagoner MD. Penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus and vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Cornea. 2000;19:468–70.
Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, Tanner JP, Beck R, Gal R, et al. Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cornea. 2009;28:981–5.
Woodmansey EJ. Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:1178–86.
Eye Bank Association of America. Medical Standards 2016 2014 [Available from: http://restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Med-Standards-October-2016.pdf.
Institute CaLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 26th informational supplement M100-S26 2016 [Available from: http://em100.edaptivedocs.info/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSIM100S26:2016&scope=user.
Kaufman HE, Beuerman RW, Steinemann TL, Thompson HW, Varnell ED. Optisol corneal storage medium. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:864–8.
Lindstrom RL, Kaufman HE, Skelnik DL, Laing RA, Lass JH, Musch DC, et al. Optisol corneal storage medium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:345–56.
Lindstrom RL. Advances in corneal preservation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:555–648.
Means TL, Geroski DH, Hadley A, Lynn MJ, Edelhauser HF. Viability of human corneal endothelium following Optisol-GS storage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:805–9.
Mindrup EA, Dubbel PA, Doughman DJ. Betadine decontamination of donor globes. Cornea. 1993;12:324–9.
Murali S, Jambulingam M, Tiru V, Kulanthai LT, Rajagopal R, Padmanaban P, et al. A study on isolation rate and prevalence of drug resistance among microorganisms isolated from multiorgan donor and donor corneal rim along with a report on existence of bla NDM-1 among Indian population. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:195–203.
Mathers WD, Lemp MA. Corneal rim cultures. Cornea. 1987;6:231–3.
Farrell PL, Fan JT, Smith RE, Trousdale MD. Donor cornea bacterial contamination. Cornea. 1991;10:381–6.
Borderie VM, Laroche L. Microbiologic study of organ-cultured donor corneas. Transplantation. 1998;66:120–3.
Sandboe FD, Medin W, Bjerknes R. Toxicity of vancomycin on corneal endothelium in rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:675–8.
Cunningham WJ, Moffatt SL, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank study: trends in the acquisition and storage of corneal tissue over the decade 2000 to 2009. Cornea. 2012;31:538–45.
Sugar A, Gal RL, Beck RW, Ruedy KJ, Blanton CL, Feder RS, et al. Baseline donor characteristics in the Cornea Donor Study. Cornea. 2005;24:389–96.
Reddy SC, Paul G. Bacterial flora of conjunctiva after death. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6:632–6.
Van Meter WS, Katz DG, White H, Gayheart R. Effect of death-to-preservation time on donor corneal epithelium. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:209–22 (discussion 22-4).
Acknowledgements
We thank Juntendo Eye Bank, Japan Organ Transplant Network and Oyama Lions Club for their cornea donations. The authors thank Dr. Alireza Mashaghi, Dr. Jiaxu Hong and Dr. Masahiro Nakamura for critically reading and editing the manuscript, Dr. Ayako Nakamura for her microbiological insight and Peter Mallen for his assistance in creating the elegant figure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Inomata, T., Ono, K., Matsuba, T. et al. Pre-banking microbial contamination of donor conjunctiva and storage medium for penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61, 369–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0521-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0521-1