Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal power (CCP), and axial length (AL) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry, and the effects of CCP and AL on CCT.

Methods

Charts of 147 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative examinations for cataract surgery between April 2006 and April 2007 in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. CCT, CCP, and AL were measured by ultrasonic pachymeter (Micropach Model 200P, Sonomed, Lake Success, N.Y. USA), autorefractokeratometer (KR 8800, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), and ultrasound biometry (EZ Scan AB 5500+ Sonomed, Lake Success, N.Y. USA). Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used as indicated, and only one eye of each subject was included in the statistical analysis.

Results

Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients were included in the study. IOP and CCT were significantly and positively correlated (P < 0.001), and CCT and CCP (P = 0.001) were inversely correlated. Multiple regression analysis showed that the effect of CCT on IOP was statistically significant (P < 0.001), but the effects of CCP and AL on IOP were not significant (P = 0.614, P = 0.831, respectively). IOP increased by 0.29 mmHg for each 10 µm increase in CCT.

Conclusions

CCT, but not CCP or AL, significantly affected IOP readings obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The effect of CCP on IOP was weak and not significant despite the significant inverse correlation between CCT and CCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:767–772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paranhos A, Paranhos FR, Prata JA, Omi CA, Mello PA, Shields MB. Influence of keratometric readings on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann, Tono-Pen, and noncontact tonometers. J Glaucoma 2000;9:219–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001;108:1779–1788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389–1392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, et al.; Reykjavik Eye Study Group. Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:11–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viestenz A, Wakili N, Junemann AG, Horn FK, Mardin CY. Comparison between central corneal thickness and IOP in patients with macrodiscs with physiologic macrocup and normal-sized vital discs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:652–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimmyo M, Ross AJ, Moy A, Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:603–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong L, Saw SM, Siak JK, Gazzard G, Tan D. Corneal thickness determination and correlates in Singaporean schoolchildren. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4004–4009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Joseph IS, Watkins RJ, Nallapothula M, et al. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:518–522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunvant P, O’Leary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005;14:337–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saleh TA, Adams M, McDermott B, Claridge KG, Ewings P. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:516–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:471–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;74:223–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Touzeau O, Allouch C, Borderie V, Kopito R, Laroche L. Correlation between refraction and ocular biometry. J Fr Ophtalmol 2003;26:355–363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimmyo M, Orloff PN. Corneal thickness and axial length. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:553–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol 1999;61:551–572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, Wang JJ. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2010–2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lotufo D, Ritch R, Szmyd L Jr, Burris JE. Juvenile glaucoma, race, and refraction. JAMA 1989;261:249–252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Özcura.

About this article

Cite this article

Özcura, F., Aydın, S. & Uzgören, N. Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry. Jpn J Ophthalmol 52, 353–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0535-9

Key Words

Navigation