Abstract
This paper examines global spillover Quantitative Easing (QE) impacts of US on stock market indices by employing apart from a classical Granger causality, also a non-linear quantile regression approach for detecting causality on the tails of the stock indices’ distributions. Before US unconventional monetary policies, the non-linear causal relationship between the Fed’s balance sheet and stock markets is found to be not significant for most indices over the middle level of quantiles, whereas significant causal relationships are present in tails. There is non-linear evidence that the Fed’s assets were mainly influenced by US, Latin American, Australian and some Asian indices while the other stock indices did not Granger cause balance sheet enlargement for any quantile interval before 2008. Nevertheless, almost all domestic and foreign stock indices are found to exert feedback effects during US QE. We argue that US total assets exert non-linear causality towards all stock indices under scrutiny at least at one level of quantile and tighter links of the Fed mainly with advanced economies are found, as impacts on the upper quantile are stronger during US QE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
If no value is significant in that interval at all, lag-1 order will be selected.
Due to length limitations and the quantity of the results, the results for lag order selection of the quantile causality tests cannot be presented. However, all the results are available upon request.
References
Anaya P, Hachula M, Offermanns CJ (2017) Spillovers of US unconventional monetary policy to emerging markets: the role of capital flows. J Int Money Financ 73:275–295
Andrews D (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61(4):821–856
Apergis N, Christou C (2015) The behaviour of the bank lending channel when interest rates approach the zero lower bound: evidence from quantile regressions. Econ Model 49:296–307
Bauer M, Rudebusch G (2014) The Signaling Channel for Federal Reserve Bond Purchases. Int J Cent Bank 10(3):233–289
Belke A, Fahrholz C (2018) Emerging and small open economies, unconventional monetary policy and exchange rates–a survey. IEEP 15(2):331–352
Belke A, Wiedmann M (2018) Dissecting long-run and short-run causalities between monetary policy and stock prices. International Economics and Economic Policy:1–26
Berge TJ, Cao G (2014) Global effects of US monetary policy: is unconventional policy different? Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 5
Bernhard S, Ebner T (2017) Cross-border spillover effects of unconventional monetary policies on Swiss asset prices. J Int Money Financ 75:109–127
Boumparis P, Milas C, Panagiotidis T (2017) Economic policy uncertainty and sovereign credit rating decisions: panel quantile evidence for the Eurozone. J Int Money Financ 79:39–71
Bouraoui T (2015) The effect of reducing quantitative easing on emerging markets. Appl Econ 47(15):1562–1573
Bowman D, Londono JM, Sapriza H (2015) US unconventional monetary policy and transmission to emerging market economies. J Int Money Financ 55:27–59
Brana S, Prat S (2016) The effects of global excess liquidity on emerging stock market returns: evidence from a panel threshold model. Econ Model 52:26–34
Caraiani, P., Gupta, R., Lau, C. K. M., & Marfatia, H. A. (2019). Effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy shocks on housing prices in the United States: the role of sentiment (No. 201953)
Chadha JS, Waters A (2014) Applying a macro-finance yield curve to UK quantitative easing. J Bank Financ 39:68–86
Chen Q, Filardo A, He D, Zhu F (2016) Financial crisis, US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers. J Int Money Financ 67:62–81
Chevapatrakul T (2015) Monetary environments and stock returns: international evidence based on the quantile regression technique. Int Rev Financ Anal 38:83–108
Christensen, J., & Gillan, J. M. (2018). Does quantitative easing affect market liquidity?. Federal reserve bank of san Francisco, Working Paper 2013-26
Chuang CC, Kuan CM, Lin HY (2009) Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return–volume relations. J Bank Financ 33(7):1351–1360
d’Amico S, English W, López-Salido D, Nelson E (2012) The Federal Reserve's large-scale asset purchase Programmes: rationale and effects. Econ J 122(564)
De Long DM (1981) Crossing probabilities for a square root boundary by a Bessel process. Comm Statist Theory Methods 10(21):2197–2213
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431
Ding H, Chong TTL, Park SY (2014) Nonlinear dependence between stock and real estate markets in China. Econ Lett 124(3):526–529
Ding H, Kim HG, Park SY (2016) Crude oil and stock markets: causal relationships in tails? Energy Econ 59:58–69
Eichengreen B, Gupta P (2015) Tapering talk: the impact of expectations of reduced Federal Reserve security purchases on emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 25:1–15
Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836
Eser F, Schwaab B (2016) Evaluating the impact of unconventional monetary policy measures: empirical evidence from the ECB′ s securities markets Programme. J Financ Econ 119(1):147–167
Fassas AP, Papadamou S (2018) Unconventional monetary policy announcements and risk aversion: evidence from the US and European equity markets. Eur J Financ 24(18):1885–1901
Fratzscher M, Lo Duca M, Straub R (2018) On the international spillovers of US quantitative easing. Econ J 128(608):330–377
Gagnon J, Raskin M, Remache J, Sack B (2011) The financial market effects of the Federal Reserve’s large-scale asset purchases. Int J Cent Bank 7(1):3–43
Gagnon JE, Bayoumi T, Londono JM, Saborowski C, Sapriza H (2017) Direct and spillover effects of unconventional monetary and exchange rate policies. Open Econ Rev 28(2):191–232
Gebka B, Wohar ME (2013) Causality between trading volume and returns: evidence from quantile regressions. International Review of Economics & Finance 27:144–159
Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438
Gupta R, Jooste C (2018) Unconventional monetary policy shocks in OECD countries: how important is the extent of policy uncertainty? IEEP 15(3):683–703
Hännikäinen J (2015) Zero lower bound, unconventional monetary policy and indicator properties of interest rate spreads. Rev Financ Econ 26:47–54
Hsu TK, Chin-Chang T (2017) Explore the impact of the trading value, the oil price and quantitative easing policy on the Taiwan and Korea stock market return with Quantile regression. Asian Economic and Financial Review 7(1):15
Jeong K, Härdle WK, Song S (2012) A consistent nonparametric test for causality in quantile. Econometric Theory 28(04):861–887
Joyce MA, Tong M (2012) QE and the gilt market: a disaggregated analysis. Econ J 122(564)
Kenourgios D, Papadamou S, Dimitriou D (2015a) On quantitative easing and high frequency exchange rate dynamics. Res Int Bus Financ 34:110–125
Kenourgios D, Papadamou S, Dimitriou D (2015b) Intraday exchange rate volatility transmissions across QE announcements. Financ Res Lett 14:128–134
Kiendrebeogo Y (2016) Unconventional monetary policy and capital flows. Econ Model 54:412–424
Kiley MT (2014) The response of equity prices to movements in Long-term interest rates associated with monetary policy statements: before and after the zero lower bound. J Money Credit Bank 46(5):1057–1071
Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50
Koenker R, Machado J (1999) Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc 94(448):1296–1310
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178
Lambert, F., & Ueda, K. (2014). The effects of unconventional monetary policies on bank soundness (no. 14–152). International Monetary Fund
Lou T (2017) Nonlinear causality relationship between stock and real-estate returns in PIGS countries: wealth effect or credit-price effect. Appl Econ Lett 24(11):736–741
Lutz C (2015a) The impact of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on investor sentiment. J Bank Financ 61:89–105
Lutz C (2015b) The international impact of US unconventional monetary policy. Appl Econ Lett 22(12):955–959
Matousek R, Papadamou SΤ, Šević A, Tzeremes NG (2019) The effectiveness of quantitative easing: evidence from Japan. J Int Money Financ 99:102068
Meinusch A, Tillmann P (2016) The macroeconomic impact of unconventional monetary policy shocks. J Macroecon 47:58–67
Papadamou S, Sogiakas V (2018) The informational content of unconventional monetary policy on precious metal markets. J Forecast 37(1):16–36
Papadamou S, Spyromitros E, Kyriazis NA (2018) Quantitative easing effects on commercial bank liability and government yields in UK: a threshold cointegration approach. IEEP 15(2):353–371
Papadamou S, Kyriazis ΝA, Tzeremes PG (2019) Unconventional monetary policy effects on output and inflation: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Financ Anal 61:295–305
Philippas D, Papadamou S, Tomuleasa I (2019) The role of leverage in quantitative easing decisions: evidence from the UK. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 47:308–324
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica 75:335–346
Rai, V., & Suchanek, L. (2014). The effect of the federal reserve’s tapering announcements on emerging markets (no. 2014–50). Bank of Canada Working Paper
Raza H, Wu W (2018) Quantile dependence between the stock, bond and foreign exchange markets–evidence from the UK. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 69:286–296
Roache, S. K., & Rousset, M. V. (2013). Unconventional monetary policy and asset Price risk (no. 13/190). International Monetary Fund
Rosa, C. (2012). How 'unconventional' are large-scale asset purchases? The impact of monetary policy on asset prices. The impact of monetary policy on asset prices (may 1, 2012). FRB of New York staff report, (560)
Saiki A, Frost J (2014) Does unconventional monetary policy affect inequality? Evidence from Japan. Appl Econ 46(36):4445–4454
Stillwagon JR (2015) Testing the expectations hypothesis with survey forecasts: the impacts of consumer sentiment and the zero lower bound in an I (2) CVAR. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 35:85–101
Swanson, E. T. (2015). Measuring the effects of unconventional monetary policy on asset prices (no. w21816). National Bureau of Economic Research
Tillmann P (2016) Unconventional monetary policy and the spillovers to emerging markets. J Int Money Financ 66:136–156
Unalmis, D., & Unalmis, I. (2015). The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy surprises on asset Markets in the United States, MPRA paper no. 62585
Wang L (2016) Unconventional monetary policy and aggregate bank lending: does financial structure matter? J Policy Model 38(6):1060–1077
Wang YC, Wang CW, Huang CH (2015) The impact of unconventional monetary policy on the tail risks of stock markets between US and Japan. Int Rev Financ Anal 41:41–51
Yang Z, Tu AH, Zeng Y (2014) Dynamic linkages between Asian stock prices and exchange rates: new evidence from causality in quantiles. Appl Econ 46(11):1184–1201
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to participants of the European Economics and Finance Society (EEFS2018) conference in London for useful comments regarding an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papadamou, S., Kyriazis, Ν.A. & Tzeremes, P.G. US non-linear causal effects on global equity indices in Normal times versus unconventional eras. Int Econ Econ Policy 17, 381–407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00457-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-019-00457-y