Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of Perianal Sepsis Index (PASI) for assessing quality of life in chronic perianal sepsis

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Fistula in ano causes significant morbidity and affects patients’ quality of life (QOL). A validated five-point Crohn’s Disease Perianal Activity Index (CDAI) has been reported, but there is no validated QOL/disease activity measure for patients with cryptoglandular sepsis (CS).

Methods

We recruited 20 CS patients with active perianal sepsis requiring surgical intervention, who completed questionnaires of quantitative scores including the CDAI, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL), St. Mark’s Incontinence Score, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Qualitatively, patients listed the five most significant impacts of perianal sepsis on their QOL. Disease activity was rated by the treating surgeon. The study also recruited 20 age-matched controls with no perianal disease. After analyzing each CDAI element, and using the patient and surgeon feedback, a simplified Perianal Sepsis Index (PASI) score was created.

Results

Qualitatively, pain (100%), discharge/leakage (80%), sexual function (60%), and depression (45%) were the most commonly stated impacts by patients. There were significant differences between patients and controls in the CDAI (9.8 vs. 0) and St. Mark’s scores (7.7 vs. 0.5), as well as in three domains of the FIQOL and SF-36 (p > 0.0I). After analyzing each CDAI element, patients were inaccurate in coding the type of perianal disease and degree of induration compared with their treating surgeon’s assessment. Removing disease type and degree of induration created a simplified PASI score. There were significant differences between patients and controls regarding CDAI and PASI scores (p < 0.05) but not St. Mark’s, FIQOL or SF-36 scores.

Conclusion

The PASI score offers a method of self-quantifying the impact of perianal sepsis on QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenhammer S. Long-tract anteroposterior intermuscular fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 1964;7:438–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG. Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President’s Address. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med. 1975;68(11):681–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rizzo JA, Naig AL, Johnson EK. Anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano: evidence-based management. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(1):45–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Held D, Khubchandani I, Sheets J. Management of anorectal horseshoe abscess and fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29(12):793–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sainio P. Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1984;73(4):219–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hämäläinen K, Sainio AP. Incidence of fistulas after drainage of acute anorectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(11):1357–61. discussion 1361–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, Tan AB. Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(9):593–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winslett MC, Allan A, Ambrose NS. Anorectal sepsis as a presentation of occult rectal and systemic disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(8):597–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lunniss PJ, Phillips RKS. Surgical assessment of acute anorectal sepsis is a better predictor of fistula than microbiological analysis. BJS. 1994;81(3):368–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Anal fistula surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(7):723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong S, Solomon M, Crowe P, Ooi K. Cure, continence and quality of life after treatment for fistula-in-ano. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(8):675–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irvine EJ. Review article: patients’ fears and unmet needs in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(Suppl 4):54–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Aguilar J, Davey CS, Le CT. Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(9):1206–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Damon H, Guye O, Seigneurin A. Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2006;30(1):37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Irvine EJ. Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn’s disease as measured by a new disease activity index. McMaster IBD Study Group. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20(1):27–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sailer M, Bussen D. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. BJS. 1998;85:1716–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):482–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hüppe D, Enck P, Krüskemper G, May B. Psychosocial aspects of fecal incontinence. Leber Magen Darm. 1992;22(4):138–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rockwood TH, Church JM. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(1):9–16. discussion 16–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(6):843–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seneviratne SA, Samarasekera DN, Kotalawala W. Quality of life following surgery for recurrent fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13(3):215–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stremitzer S, Strobl S, Kure V, Bîrsan T, Puhalla H, Herbst F, et al. Treatment of perianal sepsis and long-term outcome of recurrence and continence. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(6):703–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pescatori M, Ayabaca S, Caputo D. Can anal manometry predict anal incontinence after fistulectomy in males? Colorectal Dis. 2004;6(2):97–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffin N, Acheson AG, Tung P, et al. Quality of life in patients with chronic anal fissure. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams DR, Coller JA, Corman ML, Nugent WF, Veidenheimer MC. Anal complications in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981;24(1):22–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Young MBBS, MS, FRACS, FACS, FASCRS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Tabassum, A. Zahid, C.M. Byrne, and C.J. Young declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Author contribution

All authors contributed to the conception, design, analysis and interpretation of data, as well as drafting and critically revising the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabassum, A., Zahid, A., Byrne, C.M. et al. Development of Perianal Sepsis Index (PASI) for assessing quality of life in chronic perianal sepsis. Eur Surg 50, 270–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-018-0543-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-018-0543-z

Keywords

Navigation