Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can polyglactin mesh be used for prevention of seroma after mastectomy: an experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Seroma formation is still a common problem in breast surgery. Seroma formation is associated with morbidity and financial loss. Fibrin glue was used in several studies for solution, but the results were controversial. On the other hand surgical meshes are promising to prevent the seroma formation.

Methods

A total of 48 female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups. Each underwent radical mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and disruption of the dermal lymphatic vessels. Group 1 is the control group (n = 12). In group 2 (n = 12), 1 × 1 cm polyglactin 910 mesh (Vicryl, Ethicon Johnson&Johson USA) is placed over the chest wall under the skin flaps prior to closure. The animals in group 3 received 0.5 mL fibrin glue (Baxter Healthcare Ltd. United Kingdom) topically throughout the wound before the closure (n = 12). The animals in group 4 (n = 12) received 0.5 mL fibrin glue topically throughout the wound, and 1 × 1 cm polyglactin 910 mesh is placed under the skin flaps prior to the closure. Full thickness tissue samples from both the chest wall and the skin were harvested. The harvested tissue samples were evaluated by a single pathologist in a blind fashion.

Results

The mean seroma volume of the control group was 1.536 mL whereas the mean seroma volume of the groups 2, 3, and 4 were 1.189, 0.438, and 0.556 respectively. Mean seroma volume was significantly lower, adhesion index and foreign body reaction were higher in group 4.

Conclusion

Although various studies show controversial results to prevent the seroma formation. This experimental study is an evidence that fibrin glue and polyglican mesh reduce seroma with increasing inflammatory reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken DR, Minton JP. Complications associated with mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63(6):1331–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stehbens WE. Postmastectomy serous drainage and seroma: probable pathogenesis and prevention. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, Beamer RL. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg. 2000;66(5):444–50; discussion 450–1.

  4. Hayes JA, Bryan RM. Wound healing following mastectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1984;54(1):25–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Budd DC, Cochran RC, Sturtz DL, Fouty WJ, Jr. Surgical morbidity after mastectomy operations. Am J Surg. 1978;135(2):218–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakkary MA. The value of mastectomy flap fixation in reducing fluid drainage and seroma formation in breast cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong Y, Xu J, Shao J, Cheng H, Wu X, Zhao D, Xiong B. Prevention of seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection by lymph vessel ligation and dead space closure: a randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2010;200(3):352–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitfield PC, Rainsbury RM. Suction versus siphon drainage after axillary surgery for breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1994;81(4):547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Britton BJ, Gilmore OJ, Lumley JS, Castleden WM. A comparison between disposable and non-disposable suction drainage units: a report of a controlled trial. Br J Surg. 1979;66(4):279–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron AE, Ebbs SR, Wylie F, Baum M. Suction drainage of the axilla: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1988;75(12):1211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177(6):450–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsey WH, Masterson TM, Spotnitz WD, Wilhelm MC, Morgan RF. Seroma prevention using fibrin glue in a ratmastectomy model. Arch Surg. 1990;125:305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore MM, Nguyen DH, Spotnitz WD. Fibrin sealant reduces serous drainage and allows for earlier drain removal after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective trial. Am Surg. 1997;63:97–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore M, Burak WE, Nelson E, et al. Fibrin sealant reduces the duration and amount of fluid drainage after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:591–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousou JA, Engleman RM, Breyer RH. Fibrin glue: an effective homeostatic agent for nonsuturable intraoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;38:409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosch R, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model. Eur Surg Res. 2003;35:161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laschke MW, Haufel JM, Thorlacius H, Menger MD. New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:696–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumpelick V. Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2002;103:208–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agrawal A, Ayantunde AA, Cheung KL. Concepts of seroma formation and prevention in breast cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(12):1088–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruggiero R, Procaccini E, Piazza P, Docimo G, Iovino F, Antoniol G, Irlandese E, Gili S, Lo Schiavo F. Effectiveness of fibrin glue in conjunction with collagen patches to reduce seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):170–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ulusoy AN, Polat C, Alvur M, Kandemir B, Bulut F. Effect of fibrin glue on lymphatic drainage and on drain removal time after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized study. Breast J. 2003;9(5):393–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shultz I, Barholm M, Grondal S. Delayed shoulder exercises in reducing seroma frequency after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:293–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barwell J, Campbell L, Watkins RM, et al. How long should suction drains stay in after breast surgery with axillary dissection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:435–37.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laschke MW, Häufel JM, Scheuer C, Menger MD. Angiogenic and inflammatory host response to surgical meshes of different mesh architecture and polymer composition. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):497–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harada RN, Pressler VM, McNamara J. Fibrin glue reduces seroma in the rat after mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:450–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kulber DA, Bacilious N, Peters ED, et al. The use of fibrin sealant in the prevention of seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:842–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinrach JC, Cronin ED, Smith BK, et al. Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site with fibrin sealant. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akhtar S, Spyrou GE, le Fourie R. Our early experience in the use of tissue glue to reduce the incidence of seroma formation from the latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:347–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilly FN, François Y, Sayag-Beaujard AC, Glehen O, Brachet A, Vignal J. Prevention of lymphorrhea by means of fibrin glue after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: prospective randomized trial. Eur Surg Res. 1998;30(6):439–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Burak WE, Jr., Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB. Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64(1):27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Klinge U, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B. Functional assessment and tissue response of short- and long-term absorbable surgical meshes. Biomaterials. 2001;22(11):1415–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Montes JH, Bigolin AV, Baú R, Nicola R, Grossi JV, Loureiro CJ, Cavazzola LT. Analysis of adhesions resulted from mesh fixation with fibrin sealant and suture: experimental intraperitoneal model. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39(6):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chung TL, Holton LH, 3rd, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP. Seroma prevention using Mytilus edulis protein in a rat mastectomy model. Breast J. 2006;12(5):442–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sitzmann JV, Dufresne C, Zuidema GD. The use of sclerotherapy for treatment of postmastectomy wound seromas. Surgery. 1983;93:345–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shamley DR, Barker K, Simonite V, Beardshaw A. Delayed versus immediate exercises following surgery for breast cancer: asystematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90:263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carcoforo P, Soliani G, Maestroni U, et al. Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after axillary node dissection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2003;196:365–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Department, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

    L. Yeniay MD, Ö.V. Ünalp MD, A. Uğuz MD, A.C. Karaca MD, T.Ö. Sezer MD, T. Yoldaş MD, H.B. Demir MD, M. Kapkaç MD, PhD & R. Yilmaz MD, PhD

  2. General Surgery Department, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

    M. Ünver MD

  3. Pathology Department, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

    O. Zekioğlu MD, PhD

Authors
  1. L. Yeniay MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ö.V. Ünalp MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Uğuz MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Ünver MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A.C. Karaca MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T.Ö. Sezer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Yoldaş MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H.B. Demir MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. O. Zekioğlu MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Kapkaç MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. R. Yilmaz MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ünver MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeniay, L., Ünalp, Ö., Uğuz, A. et al. Can polyglactin mesh be used for prevention of seroma after mastectomy: an experimental study. Eur Surg 46, 268–272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-014-0281-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-014-0281-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation