Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of reactivated landslide behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slope failures world-wide cause many thousands of deaths each year and damage built environment infrastructure, costing billions of pounds to repair, resulting in thousands of people being made homeless and the breakdown of basic services such as water supply and transport. There is a clear need for affordable instrumentation that can provide an early warning of slope instability to enable the evacuation of vulnerable people and timely repair and maintenance of critical infrastructure. An approach, Assessment of Landslides using Acoustic Real-time Monitoring Systems (ALARMS) is described in the paper, and results of a field trial of sensors on an active landslide at Hollin Hill, North Yorkshire, UK, are described. Continuous and real-time monitoring of acoustic emission generated by the deforming slope has been compared to traditional inclinometer slope displacement measurements. Analysis of the results has established that there is a direct relationship between acoustic emission rate and displacement rate trends triggered by rainfall events. The technique has provided insight into reactivated slope movement kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison RJ, Brunsden D (1990) Some mudslide movement patterns. Earth Surf Process Landf 15:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JE, Weller AL, Gunn DA, Kuras O, Wilkinson PB, Meldrum PI, Ogilvy RD, Jenkins GO, Gibson AD, FordJR, Price S.J (2008) Geophysical anatomy of the Hollin Hill landslide, North Yorkshire, UK near surface 2008—14th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Poland, September, pp5

  • Chambers JE, Wilkinson PB, Kuras O, Ford JR, Gunn DA, Meldrum PI, Pennington CVL, Weller AL, Hobbs PRN, Ogilvy RD (2011) Three-dimensional geophysical anatomy of an active landslide in Lias Group Mudrocks, Cleveland Basin, UK. Geomorphology 125(4):472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon N, Hill R, Kavanagh J (2003) Acoustic emission monitoring of slope instability: development of an active wave guide system. Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng J 156(2):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon N, Spriggs M (2007) Quantification of slope displacement rates using acoustic emission monitoring. Can Geotech J 44(6):966–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon N, Spriggs MP, Meldrum P, Ogilvy R, Haslam E, Chambers J (2010) Development of a low cost acoustic emission early warning system for slope instability. In: Williams AL, Pinches GM, Chin CY, McMorran TJ, Massey CI (eds) Proceedings 11th International Association of Engineering Geologists. Taylor and Francis Pubs, Auckland, September, 1803-1810

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon N, Spriggs M (2011) Apparatus and method for monitoring soil slope displacement rate. UK Patent Application GB 2467419A, Awarded May 2011

  • Dixon N, Spriggs MP, Meldrum P, Haslam E (2012) Field trial of an acoustic emission early warning system for slope instability. In landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding, 1399–1404

  • Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, John Wiley & Sons, pp 577

  • Fujiwara T, Ishibashi A, Monma K (1999) Application of acoustic emission method to Shirasu slope monitoring. In slope stability engineering, Yagi, Yamagami & Jiang, Balkema, Rotterdam, 147–150

  • Gunn DA, Chambers JE, Hobbs PRN, Ford JR, Wilkinson PB, Jenkins GO, Merrit A (2013) Rapid observations to guide the design of systems for long-term monitoring of a complex landslide in the Upper Lias Clays of North Yorkshire, UK. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46(3):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JN (1988) General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In Proc 5th International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, 3–35

  • Koerner RM, McCabe WM, Lord AE (1981) Acoustic emission behaviour and monitoring of soils. In acoustic emission in geotechnical practice, ASTM STP 750, pp. 93–141

  • Leroueil S (2001) Natural slopes and cuts: movement and failure mechanisms. Geotechnique 51(3):197–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockner D (1993) The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(7):883–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji AK, Satpathi D, Kratochvil T (1997) Acoustic emission source location using lamb wave modes. J Eng Mech 123:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ (2013) Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol 159:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura S, Asano S, Okamoto T (2008) Relationship between rain and/or meltwater, pore-water pressure and displacement of a reactivated landslide. Eng Geol 101:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt AJ, Chambers JE, Murphy W, Wilkinson PB, West LJ, Gunn DA, Meldrum PI, Kirkham N, Dixon N (2013) 3D Ground model development for an active landslide in Lias Mudrocks using geophysical, remote sensing and geotechnical methods. Landslides, pp 14. doi:10.1007/s10346-013-0409-1

  • Michlmayr G, Cohen D, Or D (2012) Sources and characteristics of acoustic emissions from mechanically stressed geologic granular media—a review. Earth Sci Rev 112:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michlmayr G, Cohen D, Or D (2013) Shear‐induced force fluctuations and acoustic emissions in granular material. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 118(12):6086–6098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima I, Negishi M, Ujihira M, Tanabe T (1991) Application of the acoustic emission monitoring rod to landslide measurement. 5th Conference on Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials (pp. 1–15)

  • Petley DN, Mantovani F, Bulmer MH, Zannoni A (2005) The use of surface monitoring data for the interpretation of landslide movement patterns. Geomorphology 66:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geol Geol Soc Am 40(10):927–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard H (1977) Sound waves in solids (pp. 6–60)

  • Shiotani T, Ohtsu M (1999) Prediction of slope failure based on AE activity. In acoustic emission: standards and technology update (Vahaviolos, S.J. (Ed.)), American Society for Testing Materials, ASTM STP, Pennsylvania, 1353, pp. 157–172

  • Schulz WH, Kean JW, Wang G (2009) Landslide movement in Southwest Colorado triggered by atmospheric tides. Nature Science Advance on: 1–4

  • Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (1978) Landslides analysis and control, transportation research board special report 176. National Academy of Science, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Spriggs MP (2005) Quantification of acoustic emission from soils for predicting landslide failure. PhD thesis, Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UK

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our sincerest gratitude to Steve and Josie Gibson (the Hollin Hill landowners) for their support and cooperation in the research. This paper is published with the permission of the Executive Director of the British Geological Survey (NERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, N., Spriggs, M.P., Smith, A. et al. Quantification of reactivated landslide behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring. Landslides 12, 549–560 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0491-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0491-z

Keywords

Navigation