Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporal variation of the genetic diversity of a German red deer population between 1960 and 2012

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the genetic development of the German Krofdorfer Forst red deer population, located in the federal state of Hesse, by genotyping red deer hunted between 1960 and 1984 (“ancient” population) and between 2002 and 2012 (“extant” population). Krofdorfer Forst belongs to the smaller red deer areas in Hesse, with a census size in spring of 200 animals and is surrounded by areas designated as free of red deer. Because of this “island” position, it should be evaluated whether there was a significant decrease in genetic diversity over time. DNA extracted from bone shavings of antlers and skulls was genotyped with 16 unlinked microsatellites. In the “ancient” population, 131 alleles were detected, from which 39 were private alleles which disappeared from the “extant” population over time. On the other hand, the “extant” population had 112 alleles, from which 20 were new alleles acquired between 1984 and 2012. This means a net loss of 19 alleles over time in the “extant” population. Despite this decrease in genetic diversity, there was a high number of effective alleles as compared to red deer populations in Bavaria. Furthermore, the low F value of 0.032 indicates low (or no) inbreeding and thus a likewise extremely low probability of deleterious alleles to become fixed. Using demographic data obtained from the red deer association of the Krofdorfer Forst, the effective population size was calculated to be 73, which reflects an increase in inbreeding of only 0.7 % per generation which confirms the low F value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcala N, Streit D, Goudet J, Vuilleumier S (2013) Peak and persistent excess of genetic diversity following an abrupt migration increase. Genetics 193:953–971

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allentoft ME, Collins M, Harker D, Haile J, Oskam CL, Hale ML, Campos PF, Samaniego JA, Gilbert MTP, Willerslev E, Zhang G, Scofield RP, Holdaway RN, Bunce M (2012) The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils. Proc R Soc B 279:4724–4733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassiadis C, Leyhe B, Olsaker I, Friedl R, Rottmann O, Hiendleder S, Erhardt G (1996) Three polymorphic microsatellites for bovine chromosomes 7, 12 and 19. Anim Genet 27:125–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop MD, Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, Sunden SL, Hawkins GA, Toldo SS, Fries R, Grosz MD, Yoo J (1994) A genetic linkage map for cattle. Genetics 136:619–639

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator V2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Res 14:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fickel J, Bubliy OA, Stache A, Noventa T, Jirsa A, Heurich M (2012) Crossing the border? Structure of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) population from the Bavarian–Bohemian forest ecosystem. Mamm Biol 77:211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB (2007) Sexually antagonistic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447:1107–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1998) Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conserv Biol 12:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon LJ, Braude S (2010) Conservation of small populations: effective population sizes, inbreeding, and the 50/500 rule. In: Braude S, Low BS (eds) An introduction to methods and models in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl GB, Zachos F, Nadlinger K (2003) Genetic diversity in European red deer (Cervus elaphus L.): anthropogenic influences on natural populations. C R Biol 326:S37–S42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kropil R, Smolko P, Garaj P (2015) Home range and migration patterns of male red deer Cervus elaphus in Western Carpathians. Eur J Wildl Res 61:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn R, Schroeder W, Pirchner F, Rottmann O (2003) Genetic diversity, gene flow and drift in Bavarian red deer populations (Cervus elaphus). Conserv Genet 4:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mommens G, Coppieters W, Van de Weghe A, Van Zeveren A, Bouquet Y (1994) Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the bovine MM12E6 and MM8D3 loci. Anim Genet 25:368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SS, Byrne K, Berger KT, Barendse W, McCarthy F, Womack JE, Hetzel DJ (1994) Characterization of 65 bovine microsatellites. Mamm Genome 5:84–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukesh, Sharma LK, Kumar VP, Charoo SA, Mohan N, Goyal SP, Sathyakumar S (2013) Loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding in Kashmir red deer (Cervus elaphus hanglu) of Dachigam National Park, Jammu & Kashmir, India. BMC Res Notes 6:326–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Queirós J, Godinho R, Lopes S, Gortazar C, De la Fuente J, Alves PC (2015) Effect of microsatellite selection on individual and population genetic inferences: an empirical study using cross-specific and species-specific amplifications. Mol Ecol Res 15:747–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995a) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995b) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1283–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roed KH, Midthjell L (1998) Microsatellites in reindeer, Ragnifer tarandus, and their use in other cervids. Mol Ecol 7:1773–1776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Marshall TC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2000) Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1657–1662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slate J, Van Stijn TC, Anderson RM, McEwan KM, Maqbool NJ, Mathias HC, Bixley MJ, Stevens DR, Molenaar AJ, Beever JE, Galloway SM, Tate ML (2002) A deer (subfamily Cervinae) genetic linkage map and the evolution of ruminant genomes. Genetics 160:1587–1597

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen P, Eggen A, Dietz AB, Womack JE, Stranzinger G, Fries R (1993) Isolation and mapping of polymorphic microsatellites in cattle. Anim Genet 24:121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stopher KV, Nussey DH, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness F, Morris A, Pemberton JM (2012) Re-mating across years and intralineage polygyny are associated with greater than expected levels of inbreeding in wild red deer. J Evol Biol 25:2457–2469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stroehlein H, Herzog S, Hecht W, Herzog A (1993) Biochemical genetic description of German and Swiss populations of red deer Cervus elaphus. Acta Theriol 38:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieven U, Harlizius B, Simon D (1995) Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the bovine HAUT 1 and HAUT 14 loci. Anim Genet 26:123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaiman D, Mercier D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Eggen A, Ciampolini R, Lépingle A, Velmala R, Kaukinen J, Varvio SL, Martin P, Levéziel H, Guérin G (1994) A set of 99 cattle microsatellites, characterization, synteny mapping, and polymorphism. Mamm Genome 5:288–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling CA, Nussey DH, Morris A, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (2011) Inbreeding depression in red deer calves. BMC Evol Biol 11:318–330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Schreiber A (2001) The impact of habitat fragmentation and social structure on the population genetics of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Central Europe. Heredity 86:703–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (2000) Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54:1855–1861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Strobeck L, Wu J, Coffin JW (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other artiodactyls. Mol Ecol 6:697–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachos FE, Hartl GB (2011) Phylogeography, population genetics and conservation of the European red deer Cervus elaphus. Mammal Rev 41:138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachos FE, Althoff C, von Steynitz Y, Eckert I, Hartl GB (2003) Genetic analysis of an isolated red deer (Cervus elaphus) population showing signs of inbreeding depression. Eur J Wildl Res 53:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the technical assistance of Mrs Bettina Hopf and the indispensable information about the Krofdorfer Forst red deer area provided by H. Voll, K. Schwarz, and K. Osan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinics for Swine, Justus Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    H. Willems, J. Welte & G. Reiner

  2. Institute for Veterinary Pathology, Justus Liebig University, Frankfurter Strasse 96, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    W. Hecht

Authors
  1. H. Willems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Welte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Hecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Reiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Willems.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willems, H., Welte, J., Hecht, W. et al. Temporal variation of the genetic diversity of a German red deer population between 1960 and 2012. Eur J Wildl Res 62, 277–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-0999-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-0999-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation