Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

More than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wolf populations have increased in Western Europe and North America. Lethal control of problem wolves is controversial and support varies among stakeholder groups. Knowing why people support or oppose policies can assist managers in dealing with the public. We examined the influence of emotions toward wolves on the acceptability of lethal wolf control. Two perspectives were used to classify emotions. The discrete perspective distinguishes qualitatively different emotions (e.g., fear, joy). The dimensional perspective differentiates emotions on the basis of valence and arousal. We conducted a survey among Dutch (n = 369) and Canadian (n = 208) university students. The independent variables were discrete emotions toward wolves (joy, fear, surprise, anger, disgust, sadness, interest) as well as valence and arousal. The dependent variables were acceptability of lethal control of wolves in three situations that reflect different problem levels (wolves present, wolves kill sheep, wolves kill human). Emotional dispositions toward wolves predicted up to 20 % of the variance of acceptability of lethal control. Disgust in both samples and joy in the Dutch sample were the best predictors. The predictive potential of fear was smaller and confined to two scenarios in the Dutch sample. Discrete emotions predicted acceptability better than valence and arousal. Emotions beyond fear should be considered in wildlife decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (2005) Attitudes, personality and behavior. Open University Press, Milton-Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrindell WA (2000) Phobic dimensions: IV. The structure of animal fears. Behav Res Ther 38:509–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bern Convention (1979) Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (adopted 19 September 1979, entered into force 1 November 1983) ETS 104

  • Bisi J, Kurki S, Svensberg M, Liukkonen T (2007) Human dimensions of wolf (Canis lupus) conflicts in Finland. Eur J Wildl Res 53:304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Reitan O, Kellert SR (1998) Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Soc Nat Resour 11:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2000) Measuring emotion: behavior, feeling, and physiology. In: Lane R, Nadel L (eds) Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 242–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruskotter JT, Vucetich JA, Enzler S, Treves A, Nelson MP (2013) Removing protections for wolves and the future of the US Endangered Species Act (1973). Cons Lett. doi:10.1111/conl.12081

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruskotter, JT, Vaske, JJ, Schmidt, RH (2009) Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents'acceptance of lethal control of wolves. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:119–131

  • Damasio AR (1999) The feeling of what happens: body and emotions in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey GC (1994) Self‐reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK population: the role of disgust sensitivity. Br J Psychol 85:541–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey GC, McDonald AS, Hirisave U, Prabhu GG, Iwawaki S, Jim CI, Merckelbach H, De Jong PJ, Leung PW, Reimann BC (1998) A cross-cultural study of animal fears. Behav Res Ther 36:735–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan RJ (2002) Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Sc 298:1191–1194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P, Friesen W (1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 17:124–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enck J, Brown T (2002) New Yorkers’ attitudes toward restoring wolves to the Adirondack Park. Wildl Soc Bull 30:16–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Heberlein T (2003) Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv 111:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fix PJ, Teel TL, Manfredo MJ, Boston SS (2010) Assessing public acceptance of wildlife management trade-offs: a case study of elk and vegetation management in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flykt A, Johansson M, Karlsson J, Lindeberg S, Lipp OV (2013) Fear of wolves and bears: physiological responses and negative associations in a Swedish sample. Hum Dimens Wildl 18:416–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda NH (1986) The emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Jansman HAH, Jacobs MH, Harms M (2012) De komst van de wolf in Nederland: Een factfinding studie. Wageningen, Alterra

    Google Scholar 

  • Gude JA, Mitchell MS, Russell RE, Sime CA, Bangs EE, Mech LD, Ream RR (2012) Wolf population dynamics in the U.S. Northern Rocky Mountains are affected by recruitment and human-caused mortality. J Wildl Manag 76:108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habitat Directive (1992) Council Directive (EEC) 92/43 of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [1979] OJ L206/7

  • Hamaker E, Nesselroade J, Molenaar P (2007) The integrated trait–state model. J Res Pers 41:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER (1980) The trilogy of mind: cognition, affection, and conation. J Hist Behav Sc 16:107–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houston M, Bruskotter J, Fan D (2010) Attitudes toward wolves in the United States and Canada: a content analysis of the print news media, 1999–2008. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard CE (2007) Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Psychol Sc 2:260–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard CE (2009) Emotion theory and research: highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Ann Rev Psychol 60:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH (2007) Wildlife value orientations in the Netherlands. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH (2009) Why do we like or dislike animals? Hum Dimens Wildl 14:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH (2012) Human emotions toward wildlife. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH, Fehres P, Campbell M (2012a) Measuring emotions toward wildlife: a review of generic methods and instruments. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MH, Vaske JJ, Roemer JM (2012b) Toward a mental systems approach to human relationships with wildlife: the role of emotional dispositions. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Karlsson J (2011) Subjective experience of fear and the cognitive interpretation of large carnivores. Hum Dimens Wildl 16:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Karlsson J, Pedersen E, Flykt A (2012a) Factors governing human fear of brown bear and wolf. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Sjöström M, Karlsson J, Brännlund R (2012b) Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores? Soc Nat Resour 25:610–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczensky P, Chapron G, Von Arx M, Huber D, Andrén H, Linnell J (2013) Status, management and distribution of large carnivores—bear, lynx, wolf & wolverine—in Europe. European Union, Brussels

  • Karlsson J, Sjöström M (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol Conserv 137:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux P (1996) The emotional brain: the mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell JDC, Swensson JE, Anderson R (2001) Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Anim Conserv 4:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ (2008) Who cares about wildlife?Social science concepts for exploring human–wildlife relationships and conservation issues. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1995) The challenge and opportunity of wolf populations recovering. Conserv Biol 9:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (2010) Considerations for developing wolf harvesting regulations in the contiguous United States. J Wildl Manag 74:1421–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (2012) Is science in danger of sanctifying the wolf? Biol Conserv 150:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An approach to environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhly TB, Musiani M (2009) Livestock depredation by wolves and the ranching economy in the Northwestern U.S. Ecol Econ 68:2439–2450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musiani M, Paquet PC (2004) The practices of wolf persecution, protection, and restoration in Canada and the United States. Bioscience 54(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen EB, Milner-Gulland E, Schofield L, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Coulson T (2007) Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sc 274:995–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman A (2009) Of snakes and faces: an evolutionary perspective on the psychology of fear. Scand J Psychol 50:543–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman A, Soares JJ (1994) “Unconscious anxiety”: phobic responses to masked stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol 103:231–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop P, Fančovičová J (2010) Perceived body condition is associated with fear of a large carnivore predator in humans. Ann Zool Fennici 47:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi E (2011) Genetics and conservation of wolf Canis lupus in Europe. Mammal Rev 41:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2012) Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Biol Conserv 145:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn B, Linnell JD, Andersen R (2003) Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public. Evol Hum Behav 24:184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley CR (2008) Disgust. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guildford Press, New York, pp 757–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev 110:145–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenecker KA, Shaw WW (1997) Attitudes toward a proposed reintroduction of Mexican gray wolves in Arizona. Hum Dimens Wildl 2:42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma MTJ, Vaske JJ, Jacobs MH (2012) Acceptability of lethal control of wildlife that damage agriculture in the Netherlands. Soc Nat Resour 25:1308–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slagle KM, Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2012) The role of affect in public support and opposition to wolf management. Hum Dimens Wildl 17:44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens W (2012) Gray wolf rising: why the clash over wolf management in the Northern Rockies calls for congressional action to define “recovery” under the Endangered Species Act. William Mary Env Law Policy Rev 36:917–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Talarico JM, Rubin DC (2003) Flashbulb memories. Psychol Sc 14:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel TL, Manfredo MJ (2010) Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv Biol 24:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Bruskotter JT (2011) Gray wolf conservation at a crossroads. BioScience 61(8):584–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Naughton-Treves L, Shelley V (2013) Longitudinal analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Conserv Biol 27:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2010) Managing the carnivore comeback: International and EU Species Protection Law and the return of lynx, wolf and bear to Western Europe. J Env Law 22:347–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Bond N (1997) The roles of gender, sex role, and disgust in fear of animals. Pers Indiv Diff 22:135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Le Q, Isbell LA, Matsumoto J, Nguyen M, Hori E, Maior RS, Tomaz C, Tran AH, Ono T, Nishijo H (2013) Pulnivar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19000–19005

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske JJ (2008) Survey research and analysis: application in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, State College

  • Vaske JJ, Roemer JM, Taylor JG (2013) Situational and emotional influences on the acceptability of wolf management actions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildl Soc Bull 37:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining J (2003) The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Hum Ecol 10:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware J, Jain K, Burgess I, Davey GC (1994) Disease-avoidance model: factor analysis of common animal fears. Behav Res Ther 32:57–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Way JG, Bruskotter JT (2012) Additional considerations for gray wolf management after their removal from the Environmental Species Act protections. J Wildlife Management 76:457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker D, Vaske JJ, Manfredo MJ (2006) Specificity and the cognitive hierarchy: value orientations and the acceptability of urban wildlife management actions. Soc Nat Resour 19:515–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams C, Ericsson G, Heberlein T (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000). Wildl Soc Bull 30:575–584

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cultural Geography, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Maarten H. Jacobs & Piera Fehres

  2. Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, PO Box CO 80523, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Jerry J. Vaske

  3. Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, PO Box V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, Canada

    Sara Dubois

Authors
  1. Maarten H. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerry J. Vaske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Dubois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Piera Fehres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten H. Jacobs.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, M.H., Vaske, J.J., Dubois, S. et al. More than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves. Eur J Wildl Res 60, 589–598 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0823-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0823-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation