Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Change in Chemical Composition and Morphological Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes Grown Under Natural Conditions

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Gesunde Pflanzen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chickpea is an important edible pulse able to be grown under rain-fed conditions. Chickpea kernels are quite rich in protein, carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins and minerals, thus play a great role in daily diets. Present experiments were conducted for two years in 2018 and 2019 growing seasons with 27 kabuli chickpea genotypes registered between the years 1991–2013 under rain-fed and natural conditions. Chemical and organic fertilizers were not used in both years of the experiments. Experiments were conducted in randomized blocks design with 3 replications. For morphological traits, plant height, the first pod height, number of pods per plant, number of kernels per pod, number of kernels per plant, kernel yield and kernel protein contents were determined. For chemical composition of kernels, heavy metals (Cr, Ni), macro (Ca, K, Mg, Na, P, S) and micro elements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe) were determined. Significant increases and decreases were encountered in investigated traits based on registration years. Principal component analysis (PCA) for morphological traits and chemical composition of 27 different genotypes revealed that there were significant positive correlations between phosphorus and zinc contents and Akcin 91 cultivars was prominent for these two elements; there were positive correlations also between copper and iron and Cakır and Ilgaz cultivars were prominent for these elements. In terms of kernel yield, the cultivars (Aziziye 94 and Damla 89) registered in 1994 were found to be prominent. Kernel yields had positive correlations with Na content, but negative correlations with Ca, Fe, Cu and Mn contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alajaji SA, El-Adawy TA (2006) Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by microwave cooking and other traditional cooking methods. J Food Compost Anal 19(8):806–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.03.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babagil G (2011) Erzurum ekolojik koşulları da bazı nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitleri verim ve verim özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 26(2):122–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicer BT, Albayrak Ö, Akıncı C (2017) Farklı ekim zamanlarının nohutta verim ve verim unsurlarına etkisi. J Adnan Menderes Univ Agric Fac. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.295351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Chen S, Jha RK, Cotrozzi L, Nali C, Lorenzini G, Ma L (2020) Phenol metabolism of two cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) as affected by ozone and flooding stress. J Agro Crop Sci 206(3):338–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci CY, Önder M, Ceyhan E, Kaya M, Karaköy T, Akdoğan G, Benlioğlu B, Özaktan H (2020) Yemeklik baklagiller üretiminde mevcut durum ve gelecek. In: Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri IX. Teknik Kongresi, pp 395–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A, Karakoy T, Durukan H, Erdem H (2017) The impacts of the biochar addition in different doses on yield and nutrient uptake of the Chickpea plant (Cicer arietinum L.) under the conditions with and without incubation. Fresenius Environ Bull 26(12A):8328–8336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdemci İ (2012) Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesi koşullarında farklı nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) genotiplerinin yazlık ve kışlık ekimlerinde bazı tarımsal ve teknolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi, p 45 (Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri ABD, Doktora Tezi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereifej KI, Al-Karaki GN, Hammouri MK (2001) Seed chemical composition of improved chickpea cultivars grown under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Int J Food Prop 4(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1081/JFP-100105190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV. Accessed: 15.12.2021

  • Gaur PM, Singh MK, Samineni S, Sajja SB, Jukanti AK, Kamatam S, Varshney RK (2016) Inheritance of protein content and its relationships with seed size, grain yield and other traits in chickpea. Euphytica 209(1):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1678-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gozen V (2008). Morphologıc characterızatıon in hybrıd greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) breedıng and determınatıon of approprıate hybrıd combınatıons and hybrıd seed qualıty. Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science Department of Horticulture, Ph.D. Thesis, 185s, Ankara

  • Gungor H, Dumlupınar Z (2018) Bazı nohut çeşit ve hatlarının verim ve verim unsurları bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Derim 35(2):194–200. https://doi.org/10.16882/derim.2018.444157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N, Shrivastava N, Bhagyawant SS (2017) Multivariate analysis based on nutritional value, antinutritional profile and antioxidant capacity of forty chickpea genotypes grown in India. J Nutr Food Sci 7(3):1000600. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur K, Grewal SK, Gill PS, Singh S (2019) Comparison of cultivated and wild chickpea genotypes for nutritional quality and antioxidant potential. J Food Sci Technol 56(4):1864–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03646-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur M, Singh N, Sodhi NS (2005) Physicochemical, cooking, textural and roasting characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. J Food Eng 69(4):511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya M, Kan A, Yilmaz A, Karaman R, Sener A (2018) The fatty acid and mineral compositions of different chickpea cultivars cultivated. Fresenius Environ Bull 27(2):1240–1247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kose ÖDE, Mut Z (2020) Mineral contents of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) grown at different locations of Turkey. Sains Malays 49(2):293–303. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2020-4902-07

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krouma A (2009) Physiological and nutritional responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) to salinity. Turk J Agric For 33(5):503–512. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0902-12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Simpson Boye JI, Prasher BK, Monpetit SO, Malcolmson D (2011) Thermal processing effects on the functional properties and microstructure of lentil, chickpea, and pea flours. Food Res Int 44(8):2534–2544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens D (2005) AOAC official method 975.03. Metal in plants and pet foods. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW (eds) Official methods of analysis, 18th edn., pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olika E, Abera S, Fikre A (2019) Physicochemical properties and effect of processing methods on mineral composition and antinutritional factors of improved chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia. Int J Food Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9614570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ozaktan H (2021) Technological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars grown under natural conditions. Turk J Field Crops 26(2):235–243. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1018627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozaktan H, Doymaz A (2022) Mineral composition and technological and morphological performance of beans as influenced by organic seaweed-extracted fertilizers applied in different growth stages. J Food Compost Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozaktan H, Uzun S, Uzun O, Yasar Ciftci C (2022). Assessment of Agro-Morphological Traits of Common Bean Genotypes Grown Under Organic Farming Conditions with Multi-Variate Analyses and Applications. Gesunde Pflanzen 1–9

  • Ozer S, Karaköy T, Toklu F, Baloch FS, Kilian B, Ozkan H (2010) Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175(2):237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0174-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Ojeda AM, Moreno-Rojas R, Cámara-Martos F (2018) Mineral and trace element content in legumes (lentils, chickpeas and beans): Bioaccesibility and probabilistic assessment of the dietary intake. J Food Compost Anal 73:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sali A, Rusinovci İ, Shala-Mayrhofer V, Fetahu S, Dukagjin Z (2016) Genetic diversity for some nutritive traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from different regions in Kosova. Turk J Field Crop 21(1):156–161. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.57905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Lavale SA, Nimje C, Singh S (2021) Characterization and identification of annual wild Cicer species for seed protein and mineral concentrations for chickpea improvement. Crop Sci 61(1):305–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thavarajah P (2012) Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) micronutrient composition: Biofortification opportunities to combat global micronutrient malnutrition. Food Res Int 49(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.08.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandemark GJ, Grusak MA, McGee RJ (2018) Mineral concentrations of chickpea and lentil cultivars and breeding lines grown in the US Pacific Northwest. Crop J 6(3):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Qin L, Cheng J, Shang C, Li B, Dang Y, He H (2021) Suitable chemical fertilizer reduction mitigates the water footprint of maize production: evidence from Northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17336-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcın F, Mut Z, Erbaş Kose ÖD (2018) Afyonkarahisar ve Yozgat koşullarında yüksek verim sağlayacak uygun nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitlerinin belirlenmesi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 35(1):46–59. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Turkish Scientific Research Council (TUBİTAK) with the project number of 119O226.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamdi Ozaktan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Ozaktan, S. Uzun, O. Uzun and C. Yasar Ciftci declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozaktan, H., Uzun, S., Uzun, O. et al. Change in Chemical Composition and Morphological Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes Grown Under Natural Conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen 75, 1385–1400 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00741-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00741-z

Keywords

Navigation