Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economic Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Adoption in Apple Cultivation: a Turkish Case Study

Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnung bei der Anpassung des Integrierten Pflanzenschutzes im Apfelanbau: eine Fallstudie in der Türkei

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to determine adoption level of farmers to integrated pest management (IPM) program and also to analyse the agricultural pesticide usage in apple growing. The primary data includes a research carried out through a questionnaire method which was conducted to apple producers in Antalya, Denizli, Isparta, Karaman, Konya and Niğde. According to the information received from the survey farms were separated into four groups according to IPM adoption level. It has been found out that the amount of pesticides used per hectare decreases according to the adoption of integrated pest management. While 1 kg apple cost found USD 0.40 in farms which does not follow IPM, USD 0.38 in farms which follow IPM. However, net profit per hectare is USD 556.75 in farms which does not follow integrated pest management; it is USD 482.51 in farms which follow high level IPM. In conclusion; to implement an efficient IPM, producers primarily should take cultural precautions and in the last resort they should look for chemical methods. They should avoid extreme use of nitrogenous fertilization, they should use high quality saplings, create a suitable ecological infrastructure and habitat management to conserve natural enemies of pests, select environment friendly pesticides, make descriptions of natural enemies of apple pests, give trainings about how to prevent pests contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Açil AF, Demirci R (1984) Tarım Ekonomisi Dersleri. T.C. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Çiçek A, Erkan O (1996) Tarım Ekonomisinde Araştırma ve Örnekleme Yöntemleri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Tokat

    Google Scholar 

  • George D (2009) Current Status of Crop Biotechnology in Africa. In: Ferry N, Gatehouse AMR (eds) Environmental Impact of Genetically Modified Crops. CABI, Wallingford, pp 360–382

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karaturhan B, Boyaci M, Yaşarakinci N (2005) Extension problems of integrated pest management in Ege region: case of greenhouse vegetable. EÜ Ziraat Fak Elektron Derg 42(2):155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiral T, Kasnakoğlu H, Tatlıdil FF, Fidan H, Gündoğmuş E (1999) Tarımsal Ürünler İçin Maliyet Hesaplama Metodolojisi ve Veritabanı Rehberi. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Masud SM, Lacewell RD, Taylor CR, Benedict JH, Lippke LA (1981) Economic impact of integrated pest management strategies for cotton production in the coastal bend region of Texas. South J Agric Econ 13(02):47–52. doi:10.1017/s0081305200027266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauceri M, Alwang J, Norton G, Barrera V (2005) Adoption of integrated pest management technologies: a case study of potato farmers in Carchi, ecuador. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, 24–27 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissle M, Mouron P, Musa T, Bigler F, Pons X, Vasileiadis VP, Otto S, Antichi D, Kiss J, Pálinkás Z, Dorner Z, Van Der Weide R, Groten J, Czembor E, Adamczyk J, Thibord JB, Melander B, Cordsen Nielsen G, Poulsen RT, Zimmermann O, Verschwele A, Oldenburg E (2010) Pests, pesticide use and alternative options in European maize production: current status and future prospects. J Appl Entomol 134(5):357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson K, Badibanga T, Difonzo C (2008) Farmers’ awareness and use of IPM for soybean aphid control: report of survey results for the 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 crop years. Staff Paper Series. Minnesota University College of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit M, Paudel KP, Hinson R (2012) Intensity of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices adoption by U.S. nursery crop producers. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2012 AAEA Annual Meeting, Seattle, 12–14 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2008) Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 363:447–465. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Röling NG, Pretty JN (1997) Extension’s role in sustainable agricultural development. In: Swanson BE, Bentz RP, Sofranko AJ (eds) Improving agricultural extension. FAO, Rome, pp 181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SB, Mukherjee I, Maisnam J, Kumar P, Gopal M, Kulshrestha G (2009) Determination of pesticide residues in integrated pest management and nonintegrated pest management samples of apple (Malus pumila mill.). J Agric Food Chem 57:11277–11283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanrivermiş H (2000) Orta Sakarya Havzası’nda Domates Üretiminde Tarımsal İlaç Kullanımının Ekonomik Analizi. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TUİK (2013) Turkish Statistical Institute agriculture database. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do. Accessed 10.12.2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BW (2000) Methodology of an IPM impact assessment: development and application of a protocol in michigan tart cherries. Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki C, Demir T, Kılıç M, Kural İ, Çakır O, Tokgönül S, Hepdurgun B, Çalı S, Aydoğdu S (1998) Elma Bahçelerinde Entegre Mücadele Teknik Talimatı. Zirai Mücadele Enstitüsü Yayınları, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank TAGEM (project no: TAGEM-10/AR-GE/04) and Süleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mevlüt Gül.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gül, M., Akpinar, M.G., Demircan, V. et al. Economic Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Adoption in Apple Cultivation: a Turkish Case Study. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59, 147–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0309-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0309-3

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation