Abstract
Methodology that integrates traditional QSRR modeling with transfer of information from isocratic to gradient environment was presented in the previous paper as an efficient new chromatographic approach. The previous research included application of conventional regression techniques that resulted in relatively high prediction errors. Also, it was shown that prediction error of the integrated model was mostly caused by prediction of the QSRR models. Therefore, artificial intelligence was applied in this work in order to improve the prediction ability of QSRR-based model: Artificial neural networks were selected for QSRR modeling, while genetic algorithm was used for the selection of optimal descriptors. Both artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm were optimized in order to build accurate and reliable QSRR models. Selection function, crossover function, and percentage of genes’ mutations were varied in case of genetic algorithm, while artificial neural networks were optimized by means of different network type, training algorithm and number of neurons in hidden layer. During retention modeling, basic QSRR models developed for specific eluent strength were upgraded to isocratic, and thereafter to gradient retention model. None of the three developed models showed systematic errors, and the obtained predictions (RMSEP 11.66, 10.67, and 7.10 %, respectively) indicated significant improvement from the results presented in previous paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kaliszan R (1997) Structure and retention in chromatography. A chemometric approach. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
Kaliszan R, Osmialowski K, Tomellini SA, Hsu S-H, Fazio SD, Hartwick RA (1986) J Chromatogr A 352:141–155
Kaliszan R, Nasal A, Turowski M (1996) J Chromatogr A 722:25–32
Jiskra J, Claessens HA, Cramers CA, Kaliszan R (2002) J Chromatogr A 977:193–206
Michel M, Bączek T, Studzińska S, Bodzioch K, Jonsson T, Kaliszan R, Buszewski B (2007) J Chromatogr A 1175:49–54
Bączek T, Bodzioch K, Michalska E, Kaliszan R (2008) Chromatographia 68:161–166
Garkani-Nejad Z (2009) Chromatographia 70:869–874
Bodzioch K, Bączek T, Kaliszan R, Vander Heyden Y (2009) J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 50:563–569
Ghavami R, Faham S (2010) Chromatographia 72:893–903
Studzińska S, Molíková M, Kosobucki P, Jandera P, Buszewski B (2011) Chromatographia 73:S35–S44
Nasal A, Payer K, Haber P, Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Kaliszan R (1998) LC GC Int 11:240–252
Kaliszan R, van Straten MA, Markuszewski M, Cramers CA, Claessens HA (1999) J Chromatogr A 855:455–486
Fatemi MH, Abraham MH, Poole CF (2008) Combination of artificial neural network technique and linear free energy relationship parameters in the prediction of gradient retention times in liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1190:241–252
Baczek T, Kaliszan R (2002) J Chromatogr A 962:41–55
Baczek T, Kaliszan R (2003) J Chromatogr A 987:29–37
Bodzioch K, Durand A, Kaliszan R, Bączek T, Vander Heyden Y (2010) Talanta 81:1711–1718
Bolanča T, Cerjan-Stefanović Š, Luša M, Rogošić M, Ukić Š (2006) J Chromatogr A 1121:228–235
Ukić Š, Novak M, Žuvela P, Avdalović N, Liu Y, Buszewski B, Bolanča T (2014) Chromatographia. doi:10.1007/s10337-014-2653-5
Vivó-Truyols G, Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Alvarez-Coque MC (2001) Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 59:89–106
Quirino WG, Teixeira KC, Legnani C, Calil VL, Messer B, Vilela Neto OP, Pacheco MAC, Cremona M (2009) Thin Solid Films 518:1382–1385
Rajeswari K, Vaithiyanathan V, Neelakantan TR (2012) Procedia Eng 41:1818–1823
Jung S, Kwon S-D (2013) Appl Energ 111:778–790
Fedele R, Maier G, Miller B (2005) Struct Infrastruct E 1:165–180
Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Macmillan, New York
Tagliaferri R, Longo G, Milano L, Acernese F, Barone F, Ciaramella A, De Rosa R, Donalek C, Eleuteri A, Raiconi G, Sessa S, Staiano A, Volpicelli A (2003) Neural Netw 16:297–319
Kröse B, van der Smagt P (1996) An introduction to neural networks, 5th edn. The University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
Unay D (2006) Multispectral image processing and pattern recognition techniques for quality inspection of apple fruits. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
Tham SY, Agatonovic-Kustrin A (2002) J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 28:581–590
Thermo Fisher Scientific (2011) Product manual CarboPac PA20. http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/4378-Man-031884-05-CarboPac-PA20-Jul11.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2014
Basumallick L, Rohrer J (2012) Thermo Fisher Scientific Application Note 282. http://www.dionex.com/en-us/webdocs/113489-AN282-IC-Biofuel-Sugars-03May2012-LPN2876-R2.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2014
Bolanča T, Cerjan-Stefanović Š, Ukić Š, Rogošić M, Luša M (2009) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 32:1373–1391
Ukić Š, Rogošić M, Novak M, Šimović E, Tišler V, Bolanča T (2013) J Anal Methods Chem 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/549729
Acknowledgments
Generous support and help from Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in the special paper collection 19th International Symposium on Separation Sciences with guest editors Tomislav Bolanča and Bogusław Buszewski.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ukić, Š., Novak, M., Vlahović, A. et al. Development of Gradient Retention Model in Ion Chromatography. Part II: Artificial Intelligence QSRR Approach. Chromatographia 77, 997–1007 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2654-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2654-4